Quantitative Research on Causes of Channel Conflict Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

Author(s):  
Zhongqi Sheng ◽  
Huatao Fan ◽  
Ying Lu ◽  
Yihui Xu
PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0253001
Author(s):  
Saeed Shahabi ◽  
Shahina Pardhan ◽  
Ahmad Ahmadi Teymourlouy ◽  
Dimitrios Skempes ◽  
Shabnam Shahali ◽  
...  

Introduction Health benefits package (HBP) is regarded as one of the main dimensions of health financing strategy. Even with increasing demands for prosthetics and orthotics (P&O) services to approximately 0.5% of the world’s population, only 15% of vulnerable groups have the chance to make use of such benefits. Inadequate coverage of P&O services in the HBP is accordingly one of the leading reasons for this situation in many countries, including Iran. Aims The main objective of this study was to find and prioritize solutions in order to facilitate and promote P&O services in the Iranian HBP. Study design A mixed-methods (qualitative-quantitative) research design was employed in this study. Methods This study was conducted in two phases. First, semi-structured interviews were undertaken to retrieve potential solutions. Then an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) reflecting on seven criteria of acceptability, effectiveness, time, cost, feasibility, burden of disease, and fairness was performed to prioritize them. Results In total, 26 individuals participated in semi-structured interviews and several policy solutions were proposed. Following the AHP, preventive interventions, infant-specific interventions, inpatient interventions, interventions until 6 years of age, and emergency interventions gained the highest priority to incorporate in the Iranian HBP. Conclusion A number of policy solutions were explored and prioritized for P&O services in the Iranian HBP. Our findings provide a framework for decision- and policy-makers in Iran and other countries aiming to curb the financial burdens of P&O users, especially in vulnerable groups.


Geotecnia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 21-42
Author(s):  
José Henrique Ferronato Pretto ◽  
◽  
<br>Priscila Batista ◽  
<br>Adilson Lago Leite ◽  
<br>Alessander C. Morales Kormann ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 1089
Author(s):  
Ghefra Rizkan Gaffara ◽  
Fitri Wulandari

Kota Semarang merupakan kota metropolitan yang memiliki tingkat bahaya amblesan tanah mencapai 14-19 cm/tahun pada lokasi tertentu (Abidin et al, 2010). Penyebab kritis terjadinya peningkatan amblesan tanah adalah meningkatnya kawasan terbangun secara masif di kawasan pesisir dan eksploitasi pengambilan air tanah, khususnya di Semarang Utara. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perubahan lahan yang terjadi pada tahun 2004 dan tahun 2013 dan untuk mengetahui indeks bahaya amblesan tanah di penggunaan lahan wilayah studi. Metodelogi yang muncul dalam penentuan land subsidence dengan sebuah konsesus melalui Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Penentuan item yang digunakan mempertimbangkan adanya ancaman/bahaya, tingkat kerentanan, dan risiko. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa beberapa faktor termasuk penggunaan lahan menjadi penyebab amblesan tanah di wilayah studi. Persentase perubahan lahan sebesar 49,99% untuk perubahan lahan kosong menjadi lahan yang akan dibangun dan industri pergudangan. Faktor-faktor utama yang menjadi penyebab amblesan tanah berdasarkan kuesioner adalah penurunan Muka Air Tanah (MAT) dengan persentase sebesar 61% dan perubahan lahan dengan persentase sebesar 19 %. Penelitian ini menghasilkan rekomendasi baik bersifat teknis maupun non-teknis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document