SAR observations of organized large eddies over the Somali current

Author(s):  
Michael J. Caruso ◽  
Ralph C. Foster ◽  
Hans C. Graber
1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Drobinski ◽  
Robert a. Brown ◽  
Pierre H. Flamant ◽  
Jacques Pelon

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 873-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changgen Lu ◽  
Weidong Cao ◽  
Yanmei Zhang ◽  
Jintao Peng

Author(s):  
Y. Jin ◽  
A. V. Kuznetsov

One of the most controversial topics in the field of convection in porous media is the issue of macroscopic turbulence. It remains unclear whether it can occur in porous media. It is difficult to carry out velocity measurements within porous media, as they are typically optically opaque. At the same time, it is now possible to conduct a definitive direct numerical simulation (DNS) study of this phenomenon. We examine the processes that take place in porous media at large Reynolds numbers, attempting to accurately describe them and analyze whether they can be labeled as true turbulence. In contrast to existing work on turbulence in porous media, which relies on certain turbulence models, DNS allows one to understand the phenomenon in all its complexity by directly resolving all the scales of motion. Our results suggest that the size of the pores determines the maximum size of the turbulent eddies. If the size of turbulent eddies cannot exceed the size of the pores, then turbulent phenomena in porous media differ from turbulence in clear fluids. Indeed, this size limitation must have an impact on the energy cascade, for in clear fluids the turbulent kinetic energy is predominantly contained within large eddies.


2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 7535-7567
Author(s):  
J. Lauros ◽  
E. D. Nilsson ◽  
M. Dal Maso ◽  
M. Kulmala

Abstract. The connection between new particle formation and micro- and mesoscale meteorology was studied based on measurements at SMEAR II station in Southern Finland. We analyzed turbulent conditions described by sodar measurements and utilized these combined with surface layer measurements and a simple model to estimate the upper boundary layer conditions. Turbulence was significantly stronger on particle formation days and the organic vapor saturation ratio increase due to large eddies was stronger on event than nonevent days. We examined which variables could be the best indicators of new particle formation and concluded that the formation probability depended on the condensation sink and temporal temperature change at the top of the atmospheric boundary layer. Humidity and heat flux may also be good indicators for particle formation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 744 ◽  
pp. 217-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Herlina ◽  
J. G. Wissink

AbstractTo elucidate the physical mechanisms that play a role in the interfacial transfer of atmospheric gases into water, a series of direct numerical simulations of mass transfer across the air–water interface driven by isotropic turbulence diffusing from below has been carried out for various turbulent Reynolds numbers ($R_T=84,195,507$). To allow a direct (unbiased) comparison of the instantaneous effects of scalar diffusivity, in each of the DNS up to six scalar advection–diffusion equations with different Schmidt numbers were solved simultaneously. As far as the authors are aware this is the first simulation that is capable to accurately resolve the realistic Schmidt number, $\mathit{Sc}=500$, that is typical for the transport of atmospheric gases such as oxygen in water. For the range of turbulent Reynolds numbers and Schmidt numbers considered, the normalized transfer velocity $K_L$ was found to scale with $R_T^{-{1/2}}$ and $\mathit{Sc}^{-{1/2}}$, which indicates that the largest eddies present in the isotropic turbulent flow introduced at the bottom of the computational domain tend to determine the mass transfer. The $K_L$ results were also found to be in good agreement with the surface divergence model of McCready, Vassiliadou & Hanratty (AIChE J., vol. 32, 1986, pp. 1108–1115) when using a constant of proportionality of 0.525. Although close to the surface large eddies are responsible for the bulk of the gas transfer, it was also observed that for higher $R_T$ the influence of smaller eddies becomes more important.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document