Experimental results for set-based control within the singularity-robust multiple task-priority inverse kinematics framework

Author(s):  
Signe Moe ◽  
Gianluca Antonelli ◽  
Kristin Y. Pettersen ◽  
Johannes Schrimpf
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (22) ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Hauan Arbo ◽  
Jan Tommy Gravdahl

Author(s):  
Tresna Dewi ◽  
Siti Nurmaini ◽  
Pola Risma ◽  
Yurni Oktarina ◽  
Muhammad Roriz

The arm robot manipulator is suitable for substituting humans working in tomato plantation to ensure tomatoes are handled efficiently. The best design for this robot is four links with robust flexibility in x, y, and z-coordinates axis. Inverse kinematics and fuzzy logic controller (FLC) application are for precise and smooth motion. Inverse kinematics designs the most efficient position and motion of the arm robot by adjusting mechanical parameters. The FLC utilizes data input from the sensors to set the right position and motion of the end-effector. The predicted parameters are compared with experimental results to show the effectiveness of the proposed design and method. The position errors (in x, y, and z-axis) are 0.1%, 0.1%, and 0.04%. The rotation errors of each robot links (θ1, θ2, and θ3) are 0%, 0.7% and 0.3%. The FLC provides the suitable angle of the servo motor (θ4) responsible in gripper motion, and the experimental results correspond to FLC’s rules-based as the input to the gripper motion system. This setup is essential to avoid excessive force or miss-placed position that can damage tomatoes. The arm robot manipulator discussed in this study is a pick and place robot to move the harvested tomatoes to a packing system.


Author(s):  
Robert S. Gutzwiller ◽  
Danielle M. Sitzman

The Strategic Task Overload Model (STOM) seeks to predict the choices of operators when they are confronted with multiple task options in an overloading situation. These situations characterize safety-critical incidents and work domains, such as a worker in a nuclear power plant or aircraft cockpit when multiple alarms sound, additional interruptions occur, and ongoing tasks must still be performed. Training and other safety considerations may instruct operators to “prioritize” certain tasks over others under these conditions, such as paying attention to the forward roadway while driving, instead of a passenger or a cell phone. However, priority may not exercise much power over the choice to switch tasks. Supporting prior data, the current experiment using a multi-task battery show priority instructions exerted no effect on the choice to switch task behavior; and in contrast to prior work, instructions also did not influence the time spent performing a prioritized task.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document