I/Q Imbalance Calibration Method for 5G Ultra-Wideband Transceivers

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
pp. 3048-3052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuan Dao ◽  
Gernot Hueber
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (09) ◽  
pp. 2050137
Author(s):  
Shengxi Diao ◽  
Fujiang Lin ◽  
Yuanjin Zheng

In this paper, an offline bandwidth and frequency calibration method for an on–off LC oscillator-based ultra-wideband impulse radio (UWB-IR) transmitter is presented. Implemented in 0.18-[Formula: see text]m CMOS, the offline calibration circuits consume very little power. This allows the transmitter to consume an ultra-low average power of 319[Formula: see text][Formula: see text]W over 3–5[Formula: see text]GHz at 2[Formula: see text]Mbps. The calibration is critical to ensure the FCC spectral mask compliance despite the process–voltage–temperature (PVT) variations. The transmitter can deliver a large differential output swing of 1.8–3[Formula: see text]V to a 100-[Formula: see text] load with minimal power efficiency of 7% at different data rates (2–30[Formula: see text]Mbps). It is suitable for WPAN application with localization and positioning capabilities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 101103
Author(s):  
曹文娟 Cao Wenjuan ◽  
高万荣 Gao Wanrong ◽  
伍秀玭 Wu Xiupin

Author(s):  
Thomas Buchegger ◽  
Gerald Oßberger ◽  
Alexander Reisenzahn ◽  
Erwin Hochmair ◽  
Andreas Stelzer ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-494
Author(s):  
Bowen Wang ◽  
Haixin Song ◽  
Woogeun Rhee ◽  
Zhihua Wang

2010 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Hantscher ◽  
Alexander Reisenzahn ◽  
Harald Kainmüller ◽  
Christian G. Diskus

Author(s):  
Kai Wen ◽  
Kegen Yu

The chapter studies the positioning techniques based on ultra wideband (UWB) and low cost inertial measurement unit (IMU) with a focus on the fundamental theories of integrated positioning based on UWB and IMU. Details are provided for multilateral positioning theory of UWB, UWB calibration method, IMU error analysis, inertial navigation algorithm, and Kalman filter (KF) theory. Particularly, to mitigate the influence of non-line-of-sight (NLOS) propagation on positioning accuracy, a NLOS mitigation method based on fuzzy theory is presented. Meanwhile, the detailed data fusion processes of loosely coupled and tightly coupled systems are introduced and performance evaluation is conducted using experimental data.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 221-224
Author(s):  
Yuri V. Andreyev ◽  
Alexander S. Dmitriev ◽  
Elena V. Efremova ◽  
Vadim A. Lazarev

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 2294
Author(s):  
Peter Krapež ◽  
Matjaž Vidmar ◽  
Marko Munih

An ultra-wideband (UWB) localization system is an alternative in a GPS-denied environment. However, a distance measurement with UWB modules using a two-way communication protocol induces an orientation-dependent error. Previous research studied this error by looking at parameters such as the received power and the channel response signal. In this paper, the neural network (NN) method for correcting the orientation-induced distance error without the need to calculate the signal strength, obtain the channel response or know any parameters of the antenna and the UWB modules is presented. The NN method utilizes only the measured distance and the tag orientation, and implements an NN model obtained by machine learning, using measurements at different distances and orientations of the two UWB modules. The verification of the experimental setup with 12 anchors and a tag shows that with the proposed NN method, 5 cm better root mean square error values (RMSEs) are obtained for the measured distance between the anchors and the tag compared to the calibration method that did not include orientation information. With the least-square estimator, 14 cm RMSE in 3D is obtained with the NN model corrected distances, with a 9 cm improvement compared to when raw distances are used. The method produces better results without the need to obtain the UWB module’s diagnostics parameters that are required to calculate the received signal strength or channel response, and in this way maintain the minimum packet size for the ranging protocol.


Author(s):  
Patrick P. Mercier ◽  
Denis C. Daly ◽  
Fred S. Lee ◽  
David D. Wentzloff ◽  
Anantha P. Chandrakasan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document