scholarly journals Algorithms and Bounds for Dynamic Causal Modeling of Brain Connectivity

2013 ◽  
Vol 61 (11) ◽  
pp. 2990-3001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shun Chi Wu ◽  
A. Lee Swindlehurst
Author(s):  
Stefan Frässle ◽  
Samuel J. Harrison ◽  
Jakob Heinzle ◽  
Brett A. Clementz ◽  
Carol A. Tamminga ◽  
...  

Abstract“Resting-state” functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) is widely used to study brain connectivity. So far, researchers have been restricted to measures of functional connectivity that are computationally efficient but undirected, or to effective connectivity estimates that are directed but limited to small networks.Here, we show that a method recently developed for task-fMRI – regression dynamic causal modeling (rDCM) – extends to rs-fMRI and offers both directional estimates and scalability to whole-brain networks. First, simulations demonstrate that rDCM faithfully recovers parameter values over a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios and repetition times. Second, we test construct validity of rDCM in relation to an established model of effective connectivity, spectral DCM. Using rs-fMRI data from nearly 200 healthy participants, rDCM produces biologically plausible results consistent with estimates by spectral DCM. Importantly, rDCM is computationally highly efficient, reconstructing whole-brain networks (>200 areas) within minutes on standard hardware. This opens promising new avenues for connectomics.


2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 925-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Mechelli ◽  
Cathy J. Price ◽  
Uta Noppeney ◽  
Karl J. Friston

In this study, we combined functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to investigate whether object category effects in the occipital and temporal cortex are mediated by inputs from early visual cortex or parietal regions. Resolving this issue may provide anatomical constraints on theories of category specificity— which make different assumptions about the underlying neurophysiology. The data were acquired by Ishai, Ungerleider, Martin, Schouten, and Haxby (1999, 2000) and provided by the National fMRI Data Center (http://www.fmridc.org). The original authors used a conventional analysis to estimate differential effects in the occipital and temporal cortex in response to pictures of chairs, faces, and houses. We extended this approach by estimating neuronal interactions that mediate category effects using DCM. DCM uses a Bayesian framework to estimate and make inferences about the influence that one region exerts over another and how this is affected by experimental changes. DCM differs from previous approaches to brain connectivity, such as multivariate autoregressive models and structural equation modeling, as it assumes that the observed hemodynamic responses are driven by experimental changes rather than endogenous noise. DCM therefore brings the analysis of brain connectivity much closer to the analysis of regionally specific effects usually applied to functional imaging data. We used DCM to estimate the influence that V3 and the superior/inferior parietal cortex exerted over category-responsive regions and how this was affected by the presentation of houses, faces, and chairs. We found that category effects in occipital and temporal cortex were mediated by inputs from early visual cortex. In contrast, the connectivity from the superior/inferior parietal area to the category-responsive areas was unaffected by the presentation of chairs, faces, or houses. These findings indicate that category effects in the occipital and temporal cortex can be mediated by bottom–up mechanisms—a finding that needs to be embraced by models of category specificity.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Frässle ◽  
Klaas Enno Stephan

Regression dynamic causal modeling (rDCM) is a novel and computationally highly efficient method for inferring effective connectivity at the whole-brain level. While face and construct validity of rDCM have already been demonstrated, here we assessed its test-retest reliability – a test-theoretical property of particular importance for clinical applications – together with group-level consistency of connection-specific estimates and consistency of whole-brain connectivity patterns over sessions. Using the Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset for eight different paradigms (tasks and rest) and two different parcellation schemes, we found that rDCM provided highly consistent connectivity estimates at the group level across sessions. Second, while test-retest reliability was limited when averaging over all connections (range of mean ICC 0.24-0.42 over tasks), reliability increased with connection strength, with stronger connections showing good to excellent test-retest reliability. Third, whole-brain connectivity patterns by rDCM allowed for identifying individual participants with high (and in some cases perfect) accuracy. Comparing the test-retest reliability of rDCM connectivity estimates to measures of functional connectivity, rDCM performed favorably – particularly when focusing on strong connections. Generally, for all methods and metrics, task-based connectivity estimates showed greater reliability than those from the resting state. Our results underscore the potential of rDCM for human connectomics and clinical applications.


2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (8) ◽  
pp. e100-e101
Author(s):  
M. Bönstrup ◽  
R. Schulz ◽  
J. Feldheim ◽  
F. Hummel ◽  
C. Gerloff

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Pegah T. Hosseini ◽  
Shouyan Wang ◽  
Julie Brinton ◽  
Steven Bell ◽  
David M. Simpson

Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) is a recently developed approach for effective connectivity measurement in the brain. It has attracted considerable attention in recent years and quite widespread used to investigate brain connectivity in response to different tasks as well as auditory, visual, and somatosensory stimulation. This method uses complex algorithms, and currently the only implementation available is the Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8) toolbox with functionality for use on EEG and fMRI. The objective of the current work is to test the robustness of the toolbox when applied to EEG, by comparing results obtained from various versions of the software and operating systems when using identical datasets. Contrary to expectations, it was found that estimated connectivities were not consistent between different operating systems, the version of SPM8, or the version of MATLAB being used. The exact cause of this problem is not clear, but may relate to the high number of parameters in the model. Caution is thus recommended when interpreting the results of DCM estimated with the SPM8 software.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-51
Author(s):  
Stefan Frässle ◽  
Klaas E. Stephan

Abstract Regression dynamic causal modeling (rDCM) is a novel and computationally highly efficient method for inferring effective connectivity at the whole-brain level. While face and construct validity of rDCM have already been demonstrated, here we assessed its test-retest reliability – a test-theoretical property of particular importance for clinical applications – together with group-level consistency of connection-specific estimates and consistency of whole-brain connectivity patterns over sessions. Using the Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset for eight different paradigms (tasks and rest) and two different parcellation schemes, we found that rDCM provided highly consistent connectivity estimates at the group level across sessions. Second, while test-retest reliability was limited when averaging over all connections (range of mean ICC 0.24–0.42 over tasks), reliability increased with connection strength, with stronger connections showing good to excellent test-retest reliability. Third, whole-brain connectivity patterns by rDCM allowed for identifying individual participants with high (and in some cases perfect) accuracy. Comparing the test-retest reliability of rDCM connectivity estimates to measures of functional connectivity, rDCM performed favorably – particularly when focusing on strong connections. Generally, for all methods and metrics, task-based connectivity estimates showed greater reliability than those from the resting state. Our results underscore the potential of rDCM for human connectomics and clinical applications.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Frässle ◽  
Samuel J. Harrison ◽  
Jakob Heinzle ◽  
Brett A. Clementz ◽  
Carol A. Tamminga ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document