Predictive accuracy of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale assessment during pregnancy for the risk of developing postpartum depressive symptoms: a prospective cohort study

2014 ◽  
Vol 121 (13) ◽  
pp. 1604-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
JL Meijer ◽  
C Beijers ◽  
MG van Pampus ◽  
T Verbeek ◽  
RP Stolk ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e021251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisy Fancourt ◽  
Rosie Perkins

ObjectivesThis study explored whether listening to music during pregnancy is longitudinally associated with lower symptoms of postnatal depression and higher well-being in mothers post birth.DesignProspective cohort study.ParticipantsWe analysed data from 395 new mothers aged over 18 who provided data in the third trimester of pregnancy and 3 and 6 months later (0–3 and 4–6 months post birth).Primary and secondary outcome measuresPostnatal depression was measured using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and well-being was measured using the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale. Our exposure was listening to music and was categorised as ‘rarely; a couple of times a week; every day <1 hour; every day 1–2 hours; every day 3–5 hours; every day 5+hrs’. Multivariable linear regression analyses were carried out to explore the effects of listening to music during pregnancy on depression and well-being post birth, adjusted for baseline mental health and potential confounding variables.ResultsListening during pregnancy is associated with higher levels of well-being (β=0.40, SE=0.15, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.70) and reduced symptoms of postnatal depression (β=−0.39, SE=0.19, 95% CI −0.76 to −0.03) in the first 3 months post birth. However, effects disappear by 4–6 months post birth. These results appear to be particularly found among women with lower levels of well-being and high levels of depression at baseline.ConclusionsListening to music could be recommended as a way of supporting mental health and well-being in pregnant women, in particular those who demonstrate low well-being or symptoms of postnatal depression.


2016 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 68-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiow-Ru Chang ◽  
Kuang-Ho Chen ◽  
Chien-Nan Lee ◽  
Ming-Kwang Shyu ◽  
Ming-I. Lin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marco Aurélio Knippel Galletta ◽  
Ana Maria da Silva Sousa Oliveira ◽  
Jéssica Gorrão Lopes Albertini ◽  
Gláucia Guerra Benute ◽  
Stela Verzinhasse Peres ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Guo ◽  
Cong Huang ◽  
Yufei Cui ◽  
Haruki Momma ◽  
Kaijun Niu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This prospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association between daily seaweed intake and depressive symptoms. Methods In a prospective study conducted between 2008 and 2011, 500 Japanese adult employees aged 20–74 years participated and were included in the final analysis. Consumption of seaweed was assessed using a brief self-administered diet history questionnaire, and changes in seaweed consumption were divided into three categories (decreased, unchanged, and increased). Depressive symptoms were assessed using a Japanese version of the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). Depressive symptoms were defined as an SDS score of ≥50 in the present study. Results At the 3-year follow-up, 46 participants (9.2%) showed depressive symptoms. Multivariate analysis showed that baseline seaweed intakes were not significantly associated with the incidence of depressive symptoms (p for trend = 0.501). Conversely, odds ratios (95% CI) for depressive symptoms were lower in the participants who had higher seaweed intake than in those who had lower seaweed intake (decreased, 1.00; unchanged, 0.32 [0.13–0.81]; increased, 0.34 [0.13–0.88]; p for trend = 0.032) after adjusting for confounding factors. Conclusions This study revealed a relationship between higher seaweed intake and a lower incidence of depressive symptoms in Japanese adults.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document