Monoclonal Antibody Labeling of Mononuclear Cell Surface Antigens in Formaldehyde-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Cutaneous Tissue

1986 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rino Cerio ◽  
Patrick F Dupuy ◽  
Michael H Allen ◽  
Donald M MacDonald
Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4544-4544
Author(s):  
Mark Lones ◽  
Ivan Kirov

Abstract Recently, monoclonal antibodies have become available for treatment of lymphoid neoplasms in adults, but have not been studied in children and adolescents. These monoclonal antibodies are directed against cell surface antigens CD20 (Rituximab, Ibritumomab-Tiuxetan, Tositumomab), CD22 (Epratuzumab), CD52 (CAMPATH-1H), HLA-DR Beta-chain (Hu1D10), CD23 (IDEC-152), and CD33 (Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin). The objective of this study is to identify cell surface targets eligible for monoclonal antibody therapy in lymphoid neoplasms of children and adolescents. This is a retrospective analysis of lymphoid neoplasms evaluated by flow cytometry immunophenotyping at a single institution from January 2002 to July 2004. All patients were less than 21 years old at primary diagnosis. Flow cytometry immunophenotyping employed a 3-color method. Fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies were utilized to detect cell surface antigens: CD20, CD22, CD23 (Becton-Dickinson), and CD52 (CALTAG) conjugated with PE; HLA-DR and CD33 (Becton-Dickinson) conjugated with FITC. For this study, a cell surface antigen was interpreted as positive when neoplastic cells exhibited moderate or bright intensity staining, or interpreted as negative when staining was dim or absent. A total of 95 patients are included in this study. Demographic data: Age <1 to 20 years (median 7); Male=52, Female=43. Diagnoses included: Precursor-B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Pre-B ALL) = 80, Precursor-T Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Precursor-T Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (Pre-T ALL/LBL) = 11, Burkitt Lymphoma = 4. Total specimens = 105 (primary diagnosis = 82, relapse = 23). Immunophenotyping results for the number of specimens tested are in the Table. Table 1 Diagnosis CD20 CD22 CD52 HLA-DR CD23 CD33 Pre-B ALL 32/86 (37%) 90/90 (100%) 53/57 (93%) 87/87 (100%) 0/15 (0%) 4/90 (4%) Pre-T ALL/LBL 0/11 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 9/10 (90%) 2/11 (18%) 0/5 (0%) 0/11 (0%) Burkitt Lymphoma 4/4 (100%) 4/4 (100%) 3/3 (100%) 3/3 (100%) 0/2 (0%) 0/3 (0%) CD22 was positive (usually bright intensity) in all Pre-B ALL and Burkitt Lymphoma specimens. CD20 was positive in all Burkitt Lymphoma (bright intensity) and in a subset of Pre-B ALL (usually moderate intensity) specimens. CD22 and CD20 were negative in Pre-T ALL/LBL specimens. In a subset, CD52 was positive (moderate to bright intensity) in nearly all specimens. HLA-DR was positive (moderate to bright intensity) in all Pre-B ALL and Burkitt Lymphoma specimens. In a subset, CD23 was negative in all specimens. Also, CD33 was negative in nearly all specimens. In conclusion, lymphoid neoplasms in children and adolescents have cell surface antigens that are eligible targets for currently available monoclonal antibody therapy. Patients with Pre-B ALL are candidates for therapy directed to CD22, CD52, HLA-DR, and a subset to CD20, but not to CD23 or CD33. Patients with Burkitt Lymphoma are eligible for therapy to CD20, CD22, CD52, and HLA-DR, but not CD23 or CD33. Patients with Pre-T ALL/LBL are eligible for therapy to CD52, but not CD20, CD22, HLA-DR, CD23 or CD33. These results indicate that future clinical therapeutic trials can be designed for children and adolescents with lymphoid neoplasms to evaluate monoclonal antibody therapy directed to CD20, CD22, CD52, or HLA-DR, employing single or multiple antibodies as a new modality, in addition to chemotherapy.


1981 ◽  
Vol 154 (3) ◽  
pp. 659-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Obata ◽  
E Stockert ◽  
A B DeLeo ◽  
P V O'Donnell ◽  
H W Snyder ◽  
...  

A new cell surface antigen of the mouse related to xenotropic murine leukemia virus (MuLV) is described. The antigen, designated G(erld), is defined by cytotoxic tests with the B6-x-ray-induced ERLD and naturally occurring antibody. G(erld) is distinct from all previously defined cell surface antigens. Monoclonal antibody with the same specificity has been developed. Inbred mouse strains are classified as G(erld)+ or G(erld)- according to the presence of absence of the antigen on lymphoid cells. G(erld)+ strains differ with regard to quantitative expression of G(erld) on normal thymocytes. The emergence of G(erld)+ tumors in G(erld)- strains indicates the presence of genes coding for the antigen even in strains not normally expressing the antigen. G(erld) has the characteristic of a differentiation antigen in normal mice. In G(erld)+ strains, high levels of the antigen are found on thymocytes with lower levels being detected on cells of spleen, lymph nodes and bone marrow. No G(erld) was detected in brain or kidney or on erythrocytes. The segregation ratios for G(erld) expression on thymocytes in backcross and F2 mice of crosses between G(erld)+ (B6, 129, and B6-Gix+) and G(erld)- (BALB/c) strains suggest that G(erld) expression is controlled by a single locus in B6, by two unlinked loci in 129, and by three unlinked loci in B6-Gix+ mice. Induction of the antigen by MuLV infection of permissive cells in vitro indicates that G(erld) is closely related to xenotropic and dualtropic MuLV; all xenotropic and dualtropic MuLV tested induced the antigen, whereas the majority of ecotropic and the two amphotropic MuLV failed to do so. As dualtropic MuLV are thought to be recombinants between ecotropic and xenotropic MuLV sequences, G(erld) coding by dualtropic MuLV may signify the contribution of the xenotropic part in the recombinational event. Serological and biochemical characterization indicates that G(erld) is related to the gp 70 component of the MuLV envelope. The relation of G(erld) to the previously defined gp 70-related cell surface antigens (Gix, G(rada), and G(aksl2) is discussed, particularly with regard to their characteristics as differentiation antigens, the genetic origin of dualtropic MuLV, and the leukemogenicity of MuLV.


1985 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 769-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie G. Reeve ◽  
Denis A. Wulfrank ◽  
Jonathan Stewart ◽  
Peter R. Twentyman ◽  
Hugo Baillie-Johnson ◽  
...  

1979 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 2927-2931 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Y. Yeh ◽  
I. Hellstrom ◽  
J. P. Brown ◽  
G. A. Warner ◽  
J. A. Hansen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document