Digital Clock Drawing Test metrics in older patients before and after endoscopy with sedation: an exploratory analysis

Author(s):  
Richard A. Buckley ◽  
Kelly J. Atkins ◽  
Brendan Silbert ◽  
David A. Scott ◽  
Lisbeth Evered
2021 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anis Davoudi ◽  
Catherine Dion ◽  
Shawna Amini ◽  
Patrick J. Tighe ◽  
Catherine C. Price ◽  
...  

Background: Advantages of digital clock drawing metrics for dementia subtype classification needs examination. Objective: To assess how well kinematic, time-based, and visuospatial features extracted from the digital Clock Drawing Test (dCDT) can classify a combined group of Alzheimer’s disease/Vascular Dementia patients versus healthy controls (HC), and classify dementia patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) versus vascular dementia (VaD). Methods: Healthy, community-dwelling control participants (n = 175), patients diagnosed clinically with Alzheimer’s disease (n = 29), and vascular dementia (n = 27) completed the dCDT to command and copy clock drawing conditions. Thirty-seven dCDT command and 37 copy dCDT features were extracted and used with Random Forest classification models. Results: When HC participants were compared to participants with dementia, optimal area under the curve was achieved using models that combined both command and copy dCDT features (AUC = 91.52%). Similarly, when AD versus VaD participants were compared, optimal area under the curve was, achieved with models that combined both command and copy features (AUC = 76.94%). Subsequent follow-up analyses of a corpus of 10 variables of interest determined using a Gini Index found that groups could be dissociated based on kinematic, time-based, and visuospatial features. Conclusion: The dCDT is able to operationally define graphomotor output that cannot be measured using traditional paper and pencil test administration in older health controls and participants with dementia. These data suggest that kinematic, time-based, and visuospatial behavior obtained using the dCDT may provide additional neurocognitive biomarkers that may be able to identify and tract dementia syndromes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 920-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Cohen ◽  
Dana L. Penney ◽  
Randall Davis ◽  
David J. Libon ◽  
Rodney A. Swenson ◽  
...  

AbstractPsychomotor slowing has been documented in depression. The digital Clock Drawing Test (dCDT) provides: (i) a novel technique to assess both cognitive and motor aspects of psychomotor speed within the same task and (ii) the potential to uncover subtleties of behavior not previously detected with non-digitized modes of data collection. Using digitized pen technology in 106 participants grouped by Age (younger/older) and Affect (euthymic/unmedicated depressed), we recorded cognitive and motor output by capturing how the clock is drawn rather than focusing on the final product. We divided time to completion (TTC) for Command and Copy conditions of the dCDT into metrics of percent of drawing (%Ink) versus non-drawing (%Think) time. We also obtained composite Z-scores of cognition, including attention/information processing (AIP), to explore associations of %Ink and %Think times to cognitive and motor performance. Despite equivalent TTC, %Ink and %Think Command times (Copy n.s.) were significant (AgeXAffect interaction: p=.03)—younger depressed spent a smaller proportion of time drawing relative to thinking compared to the older depressed group. Command %Think time negatively correlated with AIP in the older depressed group (r=−.46; p=.02). Copy %Think time negatively correlated with AIP in the younger depressed (r=−.47; p=.03) and older euthymic groups (r=−.51; p=.01). The dCDT differentiated aspects of psychomotor slowing in depression regardless of age, while dCDT/cognitive associates for younger adults with depression mimicked patterns of older euthymics. (JINS, 2014, 20, 1–9)


2015 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Souillard-Mandar ◽  
Randall Davis ◽  
Cynthia Rudin ◽  
Rhoda Au ◽  
David J. Libon ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Richard A. Buckley ◽  
Kelly J. Atkins ◽  
Erika Fortunato ◽  
Brendan Silbert ◽  
David A. Scott ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e97873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Wang ◽  
Langfeng Shi ◽  
Qianhua Zhao ◽  
Zhen Hong ◽  
Qihao Guo

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. P363-P364
Author(s):  
William Souillard-Mandar ◽  
Randall Davis ◽  
Cynthia Rudin ◽  
Rhoda Au ◽  
David J. Libon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document