scholarly journals Hot Off the Press: Use of Shared Decision-making for Management of Acute Musculoskeletal Pain in Older Adults Discharged From the Emergency Department

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 956-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Cullison ◽  
Christopher R. Carpenter ◽  
William K. Milne
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley C. Holland ◽  
Katherine M. Hunold ◽  
Sowmya A. Mangipudi ◽  
Alison M. Rittenberg ◽  
Natalie Yosipovitch ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 596-596
Author(s):  
Karen Valcheff ◽  
Hoffart Nancy

Abstract Patient-centered care strives to improve older adult outcomes from the emergency department (ED). Appropriate disposition decisions from the ED for older adults are becoming increasingly complex and challenging. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of older adults as to their disposition from the emergency department, the decision making process, and their engagement in that process. The Three-Talk Shared Decision Making (SDM) model guided the study. A qualitative approach was used to interview seven older adults two days after being treated in the ED. Transcribed data were thematically analyzed using MAXQDA to identify codes, patterns, and themes. Analysis revealed that the Three-Talk SDM model was not being used. Participants identified only one option regarding their disposition from the ED and perceived they had little voice in decision making. They reported a variety of emotional reactions, feelings of helplessness and empathy regarding the decision making process. Three factors that participants perceived as vital to them before making a disposition decision were safety, pain relief, and a definitive diagnosis. The findings of this small sample are clinically meaningful. These older adults wanted to be heard regarding their treatment and disposition decisions. Findings indicate the need for provider education about the use of a model such as the Three -Talk SDM. Further research is needed to look at both the older adult and provider’s perception of the ED disposition decision. Additional strategies and skills are warranted to enhance shared decision making in the ED with the growing aging population.


Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana C. De Roo ◽  
Crystal Ann Vitous ◽  
Samantha J. Rivard ◽  
Michaela C. Bamdad ◽  
Sara M. Jafri ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc A. Probst ◽  
Hemal K. Kanzaria ◽  
Dominick L. Frosch ◽  
Erik P. Hess ◽  
Gary Winkel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S296-S297
Author(s):  
Ruth E Pel-Littel ◽  
Bianca Buurman ◽  
Marjolein van de Pol ◽  
Linda Tulner ◽  
Mirella Minkman ◽  
...  

Abstract Shared decision making (SDM) in older patients is more complex when multiple chronic conditions (MCC) have to be taken into account. The aim of this research is to explore the effect of the evidence based implementation intervention SDMMCC on (1) the preferred and perceived participation (2) decisional conflict and (3) actual SDM during consultations. 216 outpatients participated in a video observational study. The intervention existed of a SDM training for geriatricians and a preparatory tool for patients. Consultations were videotaped and coded with the OPTIONMCC. Pre- and post-consultation questionnaires were completed. Participation was measured by the Patients’ perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS). Decisional conflict was measured by the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The patients mean age was 77 years, 56% was female. The preparatory tool was completed by 56 older adults (52%), of which 64% rated the tool as positive. The preparatory tool was used in 12% of the consultations. The mean overall OPTIONMCC score showed no significant changes on the level of SDM(39.3 vs 39.3 P0.98), however there were significant improvements on discussing goals and options on sub-items of the scale. There were no significant differences found in the match on preferred and perceived participation (86.5% vs 85.0% P 0.595) or in decisional conflict (22.7 vs 22.9 P0.630). The limited use of the preparatory tool could have biased the effect of the intervention. In future research more attention must be paid towards the implementation of preparatory tools, not only among patients but also among geriatricians.


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 959-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren Flynn ◽  
Meghan A. Knoedler ◽  
Erik P. Hess ◽  
M. Hassan Murad ◽  
Patricia J. Erwin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 853-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc A. Probst ◽  
Michelle P. Lin ◽  
Jeremy J. Sze ◽  
Erik P. Hess ◽  
Maggie Breslin ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1386-1393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresita M. Hogan ◽  
Natalie L. Richmond ◽  
Christopher R. Carpenter ◽  
Kevin Biese ◽  
Ula Hwang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document