scholarly journals Emergency Potassium Normalization Treatment Including Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate: A Phase II, Randomized, Double‐blind, Placebo‐controlled Study (ENERGIZE)

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 475-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Frank Peacock ◽  
Zubaid Rafique ◽  
Konstantin Vishnevskiy ◽  
Edward Michelson ◽  
Elena Vishneva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Sodium Zirconium ◽  
Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate

scholarly journals A Phase 3b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate for Reducing the Incidence of Predialysis Hyperkalemia

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1723-1733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Fishbane ◽  
Martin Ford ◽  
Masafumi Fukagawa ◽  
Kieran McCafferty ◽  
Anjay Rastogi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Serum Potassium ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Interdialytic Weight Gain ◽  
Sodium Zirconium ◽  
Efficacy Outcome ◽  
Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate

BackgroundPatients with ESRD have minimal renal potassium excretion and, despite hemodialysis, often have persistent predialysis hyperkalemia. The DIALIZE study (NCT03303521) evaluated sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) in the management of hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients.MethodsIn the DIALIZE study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b multicenter study, we randomized adults with ESRD who were managed by three-times weekly hemodialysis and had predialysis hyperkalemia to receive placebo or SZC 5 g once daily on non-dialysis days, and titrated towards maintaining normokalemia over 4 weeks, in 5 g increments to a maximum of 15 g. The primary efficacy outcome was proportion of patients during the 4-week stable-dose evaluation period who maintained predialysis serum potassium of 4.0–5.0 mmol/L during at least three of four hemodialysis treatments after the long interdialytic interval and did not require urgent rescue therapy to reduce serum potassium.ResultsIn total, 196 patients (mean [standard deviation (SD)] age =58.1 [13.7] years old) were randomized to sodium zirconium cyclosilicate or placebo. Of 97 patients receiving sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, 41.2% met the primary end point and were deemed treatment responders compared with 1.0% of 99 patients receiving placebo (P<0.001). Rescue therapy to reduce serum potassium during the treatment period was required by 2.1% of patients taking sodium zirconium cyclosilicate versus 5.1% taking placebo. Serious adverse events occurred in 7% and 8% of patients in sodium zirconium cyclosilicate and placebo groups, respectively. The two groups displayed comparable interdialytic weight gain. There were few episodes of hypokalemia.ConclusionsSodium zirconium cyclosilicate is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for predialysis hyperkalemia in patients with ESRD undergoing adequate hemodialysis.

Results of the X-PECT study: A phase III randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of perifosine plus capecitabine (P-CAP) versus placebo plus capecitabine (CAP) in patients (pts) with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA3501-LBA3501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Thomas J. Ervin ◽  
Neil N. Senzer ◽  
Donald A. Richards ◽  
Irfan Firdaus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Iii Study

LBA3501 Background: Perifosine (P) is an oral, synthetic alkylphospholipid that inhibits or modifies signal transduction pathways including AKT, NFkB and JNK. A randomized phase II study examined P-CAP vs. CAP in pts with 2nd or 3rd line mCRC. This study showed improvement in mTTP (HR 0.254 [0.117, 0.555]) and mOS (HR 0.370 [0.180,0.763]). Based on these results, a randomized phase III study of P-CAP vs. CAP with a primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) in pts with refractory mCRC was initiated. Methods: The study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized phase III trial. Eligible pts had mCRC which was refractory to all standard therapies. Pts randomized 1:1 to Arm A = P-CAP (P 50 mg PO QD + CAP 1000 mg/m2PO BID d1-14) or Arm B = CAP (placebo + CAP 1000 mg/m2 PO BID d 1-14). Cycles were 21 days. Baseline tumor block collection and a biomarker cohort of pts with pre- and on-treatment tumor and blood samples were performed. Results: Between 3/31/10 and 8/12/11, 468 pts were randomized, 234 pts were in each arm. Baseline demographics were balanced between the arms: age < 65y (A: 65%, B: 58.5%), male (A: 57.7%, B: 53.0%), ECOG PS 0 (A: 39.7%, B: 39.7%), K-ras mutant (A: 50.4%, B: 51.3%), and median number of prior therapies (A: 4, B: 4). As of 3/19/12, median follow up was 6.6 months. Median overall survival: Arm A = 6.4 mo, Arm B = 6.8 mo, HR 1.111 [0.905,1.365], p = 0.315. Median overall survival for K-ras WT pts: Arm A = 6.6 mo, Arm B = 6.8 mo, HR 1.020 [0.763,1.365], p = 0.894; K-ras mutant pts: Arm A = 5.4 mo, Arm B = 6.9 mo HR 1.192 [0.890,1.596], p = 0.238. Conclusions: Despite promising randomized phase II data, this phase III study shows no benefit in overall survival adding perifosine to capecitabine in the refractory colorectal cancer setting. Response rate, progression free survival, and safety data will be presented. Biomarker analysis is pending to see if subgroups of patients may have potential benefit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document