scholarly journals Evaluating the effectiveness of the smartphone app, Drink Less, compared with the NHS alcohol advice webpage, for the reduction of alcohol consumption among hazardous and harmful adult drinkers in the UK at 6‐month follow‐up: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Addiction ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Garnett ◽  
Melissa Oldham ◽  
Colin Angus ◽  
Emma Beard ◽  
Robyn Burton ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Garnett ◽  
Melissa Oldham ◽  
Colin Angus ◽  
Emma Beard ◽  
Robyn Burton ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground and AimsDigital interventions are effective for reducing alcohol consumption but evidence is limited regarding smartphone apps. Drink Less is a theory- and evidence-informed app to help people reduce their alcohol consumption that has been refined in terms of its content and design for usability across the socio-demographic spectrum. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of recommending Drink Less at reducing alcohol consumption compared with usual digital care.DesignTwo-arm individually randomised controlled trial.SettingOnline trial in the UK.ParticipantsHazardous or harmful drinkers (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test score >=8) aged 18+, and want to drink less alcohol (n=5,562). Participants will be recruited from July 2020 to May 2022 using multiple strategies with a focus on remote digital methods.Intervention and comparatorParticipants will be randomised to receive either an email recommending that they use Drink Less (intervention) or view the NHS webpage on alcohol advice (comparator).MeasurementsThe primary outcome is change in self-reported weekly alcohol consumption between baseline and 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of hazardous drinkers; alcohol-related problems and injury; health-related quality of life, and use of health services assessed at 6-month follow-up. Effectiveness will be examined with one-way ANCOVAs, adjusting for baseline alcohol consumption, and using an intention-to-treat approach. A mixed-methods process evaluation will assess engagement, acceptability and mechanism of action. Economic evaluations will be conducted using both a short- and longer-term time horizon.CommentsThis study will establish the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Drink Less app at reducing alcohol consumption among hazardous and harmful adult drinkers and will be the first RCT of an alcohol reduction app for the general population in the UK. This study will inform the decision on whether it is worth investing resources in large-scale implementation.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e025788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah M Broadbent ◽  
Christopher J Sampson ◽  
Amu Wang ◽  
Lola Howard ◽  
Abigail E Williams ◽  
...  

IntroductionCurrently, all people with diabetes (PWD) aged 12 years and over in the UK are invited for screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) annually. Resources are not increasing despite a 5% increase in the numbers of PWD nationwide each year. We describe the rationale, design and methodology for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the safety, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of personalised variable-interval risk-based screening for DR. This is the first randomised trial of personalised screening for DR and the largest ophthalmic RCT in the UK.Methods and analysisPWD attending seven screening clinics in the Liverpool Diabetic Eye Screening Programme were recruited into a single site RCT with a 1:1 allocation to individualised risk-based variable-interval or annual screening intervals. A risk calculation engine developed for the trial estimates the probability that an individual will develop referable disease (screen positive DR) within the next 6, 12 or 24 months using demographic, retinopathy and systemic risk factor data from primary care and screening programme records. Dynamic, secure, real-time data connections have been developed. The primary outcome is attendance for follow-up screening. We will test for equivalence in attendance rates between the two arms. Secondary outcomes are rates and severity of DR, visual outcomes, cost-effectiveness and health-related quality of life. The required sample size was 4460 PWD. Recruitment is complete, and the trial is in follow-up.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained from National Research Ethics Service Committee North West – Preston, reference 14/NW/0034. Results will be presented at international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. This pragmatic RCT will inform screening policy in the UK and elsewhere.Trial registration numberISRCTN87561257; Pre-results.


The Lancet ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 389 (10076) ◽  
pp. 1299-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Atkin ◽  
Kate Wooldrage ◽  
D Maxwell Parkin ◽  
Ines Kralj-Hans ◽  
Eilidh MacRae ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Murchie ◽  
J Masthoff ◽  
FM Walter ◽  
K Rahman ◽  
JL Allan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Melanoma is common, 15,906 people in the UK were diagnosed with melanoma in 2015 and incidence has increased five-fold in 30 years. Melanoma affects old and young people with poor prognosis once metastatic. UK guidelines recommends people treated for cutaneous melanoma receive extended outpatient hospital follow-up to detect recurrence or new primaries. Such follow-up to the growing population of melanoma survivors is burdensome for both individuals and health services. Follow-up is important since approximately 20% of patients with early-stage melanoma experience a recurrence and 4-8% develop a new primary, the risk of both is highest in the first five years. ASICA (Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare) is a digital intervention to increase Total-Skin-Self-Examination (TSSE) by people treated for melanoma, with usual follow-up. Methods: We aim to recruit 240 adults with a previous first stage 0-2C primary cutaneous melanoma from secondary care in North-East Scotland and the East of England. Participants will be randomised to receive the ASICA intervention (a tablet based digital intervention to prompt and support TSSE) or control group (treatment as usual). Patient-reported and clinical data will be collected at baseline, including the modified Melanoma Worry Scale (MWS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADs), the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L, and questions about TSSE practice, intentions, self-efficacy and planning. Participants will be followed up by postal questionnaire at 3, 6 and 12 months following randomisation along with a 12 month review of clinical data. 12 months following randomisation will be considered the primary timepoint for outcome analyses. Discussion: If the ASICA intervention improves total-skin-self-examination practice in those affected by melanoma, this may lead to improved psychological well-being and earlier detection of recurrent and new primary melanoma. This could impact both patients and NHS resources. This study will determine if a full scale randomised controlled trial can be undertaken in the UK NHS to provide the high-quality evidence needed determine the effectiveness ASICA is a pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of total skin self-examination practice in those affected by melanoma. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov :Trial registration number NCT03328247. Registered 01 November 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03328247?term=ASICA&rank=1. First participant randomised on 25 January 2018. Keywords: Primary care, Melanoma, Cancer, Randomised Controlled Trial, Survivorship, Self-directed care, e-health, ASICA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document