Clinical impact of data feedback at lung cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A mixed methods study

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Stone ◽  
Nicole M. Rankin ◽  
Shalini K. Vinod ◽  
Mohan Nagarajah ◽  
Candice Donnelly ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 867-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind Raine ◽  
Penny Xanthopoulou ◽  
Isla Wallace ◽  
Caoimhe Nic a’ Bháird ◽  
Anne Lanceley ◽  
...  

Lung Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Stone ◽  
Nicole Rankin ◽  
Stephen Kerr ◽  
Kwun Fong ◽  
David C. Currow ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (22) ◽  
pp. 5112-5120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam M. Boxer ◽  
Shalini K. Vinod ◽  
Jesmin Shafiq ◽  
Kirsten J. Duggan

Biology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sosse E. Klarenbeek ◽  
Olga C. J. Schuurbiers-Siebers ◽  
Michel M. van den Heuvel ◽  
Mathias Prokop ◽  
Marcia Tummers

Background: Oncological computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) to facilitate workflows of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) are currently being developed. To successfully implement these CCDSSs in MDTMs, this study aims to: (a) identify barriers and facilitators for implementation for the use case of lung cancer; and (b) provide actionable findings for an implementation strategy. Methods: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science was used to create an interview protocol and to analyze the results. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among various health care professionals involved in MDTMs. The transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis following a deductive approach. Results: Twenty-six professionals participated in the interviews. The main facilitators for implementation of the CCDSS were considered to be easy access to well-structured patient data, and the resulting reduction of MDTM preparation time and of duration of MDTMs. Main barriers for adoption were seen in incomplete or non-trustworthy output generated by the system and insufficient adaptability of the system to local and contextual needs. Conclusion: Using a CCDSS in lung cancer MDTMs was expected to increase efficiency of workflows. Successful implementation was seen as dependent on the reliability and adaptability of the CCDSS and involvement of key users in the implementation process.


2021 ◽  
pp. 205141582098767
Author(s):  
Ashley Carrera ◽  
Je Song Shin ◽  
Holly Bekarma

Hospitals worldwide have taken unprecedented steps to cope with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Changes to services created challenges for delivering training in urology. Statutory education bodies implemented processes addressing trainee progression, but the extent of training disruption has not been quantified. To establish the impact on urology trainees in the West of Scotland, online questionnaires were sent to trainees and educational supervisors. Twenty-five trainees working at six hospitals across four health boards responded. Elective operating was significantly reduced, with 64% of trainees having no weekly sessions. Before the pandemic, the majority of trainees (92%) had one or two clinic sessions or more per week, but with new measures, 76% of trainees did not attend clinics. Trainee attendance at multidisciplinary team meetings halved during the pandemic. Sixteen per cent ( n=4) of trainees were redeployed, with 50% ( n=2) reporting no educational benefit. Commonly used alternative educational resources included webinars (52%) and online teaching modules (28%). Thirty-two per cent ( n=8) of trainees had examinations postponed. COVID-19 has impacted urology training in the West of Scotland, with a significant reduction in training opportunities across elective theatre, clinic exposure and education. However, trainees will be more adaptable, learn to work remotely, have opportunities to develop leadership and may help redesign services for the future of urology. Level of evidence: Not applicable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document