Oxygen sensing, anaesthesia and critical care: a narrative review

Anaesthesia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Slingo ◽  
J. J. Pandit
2019 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. e372-e384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harriet I. Kemp ◽  
Helen Laycock ◽  
Alice Costello ◽  
Stephen J. Brett

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Kentish-Barnes ◽  
L. A. Siminoff ◽  
W. Walker ◽  
M. Urbanski ◽  
J. Charpentier ◽  
...  

Physiotherapy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. e1107
Author(s):  
M. Leech ◽  
B. Bissett ◽  
M. Kot ◽  
G. Ntoumenopoulos

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maja Leech ◽  
Bernie Bissett ◽  
Marta Kot ◽  
George Ntoumenopoulos

Author(s):  
Saima Rashid ◽  
Muhammad Faisal Khan ◽  
Rajkumar Rajendram

Ultrasound (US) was introduced in the 1950s and since then its use has increased exponentially. This has been facilitated by significant improvement in the probe technology, increasing access to portable machines and better understanding of lung, heart, abdominal and vascular US. Use of critical care US (CCUS) is now extremely common. It is important for frontline physicians who must make appropriate and timely decisions within seconds. It is safe, convenient and readily available in many centers. The concept of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) differs from US screening by a radiologist or sonographer. It is, rapid focused and goal-orientated. Despite its major limitation, e.g. operator dependence, bedside CCUS can be used for an ever-increasing range of indications. This narrative review will describe the potential role of CCUS as the replacement for the stethoscope in the 21st century and the limitations which must be overcome to achieve this. Received: 3 Nov 2018Reviewed & Accepted: 10 Nov 2018 Citation: Rashid S, Khan MF, Rajendram R. Ultrasound in critical care. Anaesth Pain & Intensive Care 2018;22 Suppl 1:S160-S163


2020 ◽  
pp. 201010582094743
Author(s):  
Elisha Wan Ying Chia ◽  
Kuang Teck Tay

In the midst of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, where cases continue to increase exponentially every day, it is important to consider the future implications that this may have on the health-care system, the most feared situation being a shortage of critical-care resources, where difficult decisions have to be made about the allocation of scarce resources. In this brief narrative review, we conduct literature searches for COVID-19 ethical guidelines on critical-care resource allocation. Synthesising this information, we evaluate the relevant ethical principles and thereafter provide recommendations contextualised to Singapore. This brief narrative review aims to serve as a useful set of guiding principles for health-care professionals in Singapore, should the need for allocation of scarce resources arise.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-214
Author(s):  
Laure F. Pittet ◽  
Mohamed Abbas ◽  
Claire-Anne Siegrist ◽  
Didier Pittet

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 770-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Vieillard-Baron ◽  
S. J. Millington ◽  
F. Sanfilippo ◽  
M. Chew ◽  
J. Diaz-Gomez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Weber ◽  
Joel K. B. Lim ◽  
Christie Glau ◽  
Thomas Conlon ◽  
Richard James ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document