Editorial: risk of loss of response to anti‐TNFα agents in patients with inflammatory bowel disease—the longer the less?

Abstract Background Azathioprine (AZA) and thiopurine are widely used for induction and maintenance of remission in steroid-dependent patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study has been to investigate its efficacy and safety in maintaining steroid-free remission in steroid-dependent IBD patients eight years after the institution of treatment. Methods Data from consecutive IBD outpatients referred in our Institution, between 1985–2017, were reviewed and all patients treated with AZA were included in this retrospective study. AZA was administered at the recommended dose of 2–2.5 mg/kg. Results Out of 2992 consecutive IBD outpatients visited in the index period, AZA was prescribed to 446 patients, 245 (54.9%) were affected by Crohn’s disease (CD) and 201 (45.1%) by ulcerative colitis (UC). One hundred and ninety-six patients with a follow-up < 96 months were excluded from the study. Two hundred and fifty patients were evaluated, 140 (56%) with CD and 110 (44%) with UC. One hundred and thirty-eight (55.2%) were male and 112 (44.8%) female (average age of 35.48 ± 14.26 SD years, range 14–74 years). Eight year after the institution of treatment, 123 (49.2%) patients still were in steroid-free remission (82 CD vs. 41 UC, 58.6% and 37.3%, respectively, p = 0.0009), 71 (28.4%) had a relapse requiring retreatment with steroids (29 CD vs. 42 UC, 20.7% and 38.2%, respectively, p = 0.0030), 56 (22.4%) discontinued the treatment due to side effects (29 CD vs. 27 UC, 20.7% and 24.5%, respectively). The loss of response from first to eighth year of follow-up was low, about 21%. Conclusion Eight years after the onset of treatment about 50% of patients did not require further steroid courses. After the first-year loss of response was low in seven subsequent years. In the present series, the maintenance of steroid-free remission was significantly higher in CD than in UC patients. The occurrence of side effects leading to the withdrawal of AZA treatment has been low.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness and Safety of the Sequential Use of a Second and Third Anti-TNF Agent in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results From the Eneida Registry

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases ◽

10.1093/ibd/izz192 ◽

2019 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

María José Casanova ◽

María Chaparro ◽

Miguel Mínguez ◽

Elena Ricart ◽

Carlos Taxonera ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Bowel Disease ◽

Tumor Necrosis ◽

Significant Proportion ◽

Short Term ◽

Loss Of Response ◽

Inflammatory Bowel ◽

Necrosis Factor

Abstract Background The effectiveness of the switch to another anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent is not known. The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of treatment with a second and third anti-TNF drug after intolerance to or failure of a previous anti-TNF agent in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Methods We included patients diagnosed with IBD from the ENEIDA registry who received another anti-TNF after intolerance to or failure of a prior anti-TNF agent. Results A total of 1122 patients were included. In the short term, remission was achieved in 55% of the patients with the second anti-TNF. The incidence of loss of response was 19% per patient-year with the second anti-TNF. Combination therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8–3; P < 0.0001) and ulcerative colitis vs Crohn’s disease (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1–2.1; P = 0.005) were associated with a higher probability of loss of response. Fifteen percent of the patients had adverse events, and 10% had to discontinue the second anti-TNF. Of the 71 patients who received a third anti-TNF, 55% achieved remission. The incidence of loss of response was 22% per patient-year with a third anti-TNF. Adverse events occurred in 7 patients (11%), but only 1 stopped the drug. Conclusions Approximately half of the patients who received a second anti-TNF achieved remission; nevertheless, a significant proportion of them subsequently lost response. Combination therapy and type of IBD were associated with loss of response. Remission was achieved in almost 50% of patients who received a third anti-TNF; nevertheless, a significant proportion of them subsequently lost response.

Download Full-text