scholarly journals Zirconia implants as abutments for single crowns and fixed dental prostheses- 5 years results of a prospective cohort investigation

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 69-69
Author(s):  
Marc Balmer ◽  
Benedikt C. Spies ◽  
Ralf Kohal ◽  
Christoph Hämmerle ◽  
Kirstin Vach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Single Crowns ◽  
Zirconia Implants

scholarly journals Zirconia implants restored with single crowns or fixed dental prostheses: 5‐year results of a prospective cohort investigation

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 452-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Balmer ◽  
Benedikt C. Spies ◽  
Ralf‐Joachim Kohal ◽  
Christoph Hans‐Franz Hämmerle ◽  
Kirstin Vach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Single Crowns ◽  
Zirconia Implants

scholarly journals Esthetic Rehabilitation of Anterior Dentition with Different Types of Ceramic Restorations: Two Case Reports

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Krump ◽  
Zelmira Krumpova
Keyword(s):  
Case Reports ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Ceramic Restorations ◽  
Single Crowns ◽  
The Ideal

AbstractAll-ceramic systems represent an excellent restorative alternative for fixed dental prostheses, single crowns, and veneers in the anterior dentition. With respect to improved mechanical properties, lithium disilicate ceramic material provide a broad range of indications, and extended veneers can serve as an alternative to full crowns. Although ceramic veneers represent a more conservative approach compared to crowns, the correct indication is essential to achieving the ideal outcome. The following case reports describe two types of fixed restorations of the anterior dentition: extended lithium disilicate ceramic veneers and lithium disilicate full crowns. Factors influencing treatment selection for each type of restorations are presented.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mats Wernfried Heinrich Böse ◽  
Detlef Hildebrand ◽  
Florian Beuer ◽  
Christian Wesemann ◽  
Paul Schwerdtner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Daily Routine ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Single Crowns

The objective was to investigate clinical and radiological outcomes of rehabilitations with root-analogue implants (RAIs). Patients restored with RAIs, supporting single crowns or fixed dental prostheses, were recruited for follow-up examinations. Besides clinical and esthetical evaluations, X-rays were taken and compared with the records. Patients were asked to evaluate the treatment using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). For statistical analyses, mixed linear models were used. A total of 107 RAIs were installed in one dental office. Of these, 31 were available for follow-up examinations. For those remaining, survival has been verified via phone. RAIs were loaded after a mean healing time of 6.6 ± 2.5 months. 12.1 ± 6.9 months after loading, a mean marginal bone loss (MBL) of 1.20 ± 0.73 mm was measured. Progression of MBL significantly decreased after loading (p = 0.013). The mean pink and white esthetic score (PES/WES) was 15.35 ± 2.33 at follow-up. A survival rate of 94.4% was calculated after a mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 2.4 months after surgery. Immediate installation of RAIs does not seem to reduce MBL, as known from the literature regarding screw-type implants, and might not be recommended for daily routine. Nevertheless, they deliver esthetically satisfying results.

scholarly journals Survey of Dental Implant and Restoration Selection by Prosthodontists in Dubai

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Fatma Al Saleh ◽  
Moosa AbuZayeda ◽  
Sudarat Kiat-amnuay ◽  
Alexander Milosevic
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
United Arab Emirates ◽  
Ethics Committees ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Implant Dentistry ◽  
Implant Restoration ◽  
Implant Loading ◽  
Oral Conditions ◽  
Single Crowns

Background. With various surgical and prosthetic component designs being introduced in dental implants, decisions have to be made when choosing a system and a certain prosthodontic protocol. A survey of implant prosthodontic specialists has not been previously performed in the Middle East. Aim. This study aimed to determine selection criteria and choice of dental implants and restorations by prosthodontic specialists in the Emirate of Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Materials and Methods. A validated 16-item questionnaire was used in the survey which included demographic information, implant training and experience, implant treatment planning, implant restoration, and implant system preference. The research protocol was approved by the Research and Ethics Committees of Hamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine and Dubai Health Authority. Prosthodontists were identified from regulatory authority websites and contacted by e-mail with the questionnaire attached. Results. A total of 84.6% (77) of the registered prosthodontists in Dubai completed the questionnaire with 66.2% reported practicing implant dentistry. Out of which, 54.9% reported surgically placing dental implants and 45.1% restore them only prosthetically. Prefabricated metal abutments were the most commonly selected abutments for single crowns (76.0%) and for fixed dental prostheses (66.7%). Screw retention is preferred mostly for single crowns (68.0%) and fixed dental prostheses (74.0%). Locators were the most commonly selected type of attachment for implant-retained/supported overdentures (49.0%). Conventional loading was the most selected type of loading in all oral conditions. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that most prosthodontists in Dubai practice implant dentistry and more than half surgically place dental implants. Prefabricated metal abutments are the most selected type of abutments. Most prosthodontists use screw-retained implant restorations and prefer locator attachments for implant-retained/supported overdentures. Conventional loading is the most preferred implant loading method in all oral conditions. Implant company/system selections are various and there is no major preference for a certain system. The majority of prosthodontists select implant systems based on implant features, literature review, and simplicity of restorative kit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document