scholarly journals Three dimensional guided bone regeneration and immediate implant placement with an individualized CAD CAM titanium mesh – A case report

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (S19) ◽  
pp. 518-518
Author(s):  
Francesco Orlando ◽  
Bruno Barbaro ◽  
Carlo Alberto Vitelli ◽  
Francesco Tironi ◽  
Caterina Frascolino ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Songhang Li ◽  
Junyi Zhao ◽  
Yu Xie ◽  
Taoran Tian ◽  
Tianxu Zhang ◽  
...  

AbstractGuided bone regeneration (GBR) uses resorbable and non-resorbable membranes as biological barriers. This study compared the differences in hard tissue stability between GBR using evidence-based digital titanium mesh and resorbable collagen membranes during implant placement. A total of 40 patients (65 implant sites) were enrolled and divided into two groups: resorbable membrane and digital titanium mesh groups. The alveolar bone was analyzed at two- and three-dimensional levels using cone-beam computed tomography and by reconstructing and superimposing the hard tissues at four time points: preoperatively, postoperatively, before second-stage surgery, and 1 year after loading. The use of digital titanium mesh showed less alveolar bone resorption in vertical and horizontal directions two-dimensionally before the second-stage surgery and 1 year after loading. Regarding volumetric stability, the percentage of resorption after 6 months of healing with resorbable membrane coverage reached 37.5%. However, it was only 23.4% with titanium mesh. Although postoperative bone volume was greater at all labial sites with resorbable membrane than with digital titanium mesh, after substantial bone resorption within 1 year of loading, the labial bone thickness at the upper part of implants was thinner with resorbable membrane than with digital titanium mesh. Furthermore, digital titanium meshes made according to ideal bone arch contour reduced soft tissue irritation, and the exposure rate was only 10%. Therefore, although both resorbable membrane and digital titanium mesh in GBR were able to successfully reconstruct the bone defect, digital titanium meshes were better at maintaining the hard tissue volume in the osteogenic space.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Quaranta ◽  
Sebastiano Andreana ◽  
Giorgio Pompa ◽  
Maurizio Procaccini

Implant peri-apical lesion (IPL) is a periapical lesion, usually asymptomatic, in which the coronal portion of the implant achieves a normal bone to implant interface. A case of IPL following immediate implant placement and treated with guided bone regeneration (GBR) principles is described. Five-year clinical and radiographic follow-up with cone-beam assessment showed complete healing of the bone. GBR principles applied to IPL could completely solve the lesion.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Soldatos ◽  
Georgios E. Romanos ◽  
Michelle Michaiel ◽  
Ali Sajadi ◽  
Nikola Angelov ◽  
...  

Background. The placement of an implant in a previously infected site is an important etiologic factor contributing to implant failure. The aim of this case report is to present the management of retrograde peri-implantitis (RPI) in a first maxillary molar site, 2 years after the implant placement. The RPI was treated using an air-abrasive device, Er,Cr:YSGG laser, and guided bone regeneration (GBR). Case Description. A 65-year-old Caucasian male presented with a draining fistula associated with an implant at tooth #3. Tooth #3 revealed periapical radiolucency two years before the implant placement. Tooth #3 was extracted, and a ridge preservation procedure was performed followed by implant rehabilitation. A periapical radiograph (PA) showed lack of bone density around the implant apex. The site was decontaminated with an air-abrasive device and Er,Cr:YSGG laser, and GBR was performed. The patient was seen every two weeks until suture removal, followed by monthly visits for 12 months. The periapical X-rays, from 6 to 13 months postoperatively, showed increased bone density around the implant apex, with no signs of residual clinical or radiographic pathology and probing depths ≤4 mm. Conclusions. The etiology of RPI in this case was the placement of an implant in a previously infected site. The use of an air-abrasive device, Er,Cr:YSGG, and GBR was utilized to treat this case of RPI. The site was monitored for 13 months, and increased radiographic bone density was noted.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Kuchler ◽  
Vivianne Chappuis ◽  
Reinhard Gruber ◽  
Niklaus P. Lang ◽  
Giovanni E. Salvi

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Yung-Ting Hsu ◽  
Yu-Hsiang Chou ◽  
Tzu-Hsuan Yang ◽  
Yi-Min Wu ◽  
Chiung-Lin Huang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-49
Author(s):  
Abdulreza Fattahian ◽  
Farzaneh Poursafar ◽  
Siamak Yaghobee

Immediate implant placement has some advantages, such as time-saving, optimal soft tissue architecture preservation, and patient acceptance. In this case, prior to implant placement, minimally guided bone regeneration was performed to augment the concavity on the apico-labial aspect of a fractured maxillary right lateral incisor. After eight months, the tooth was extracted, and an implant was immediately inserted, and a provisional composite-based crown was delivered in the same appointment. After four months, well molded mid-facial gingiva and interproximal papilla were obtained, and a final metal-ceramic crown was fabricated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document