scholarly journals Fracture resistance of titanium abutments, original stock versus CAD-CAM

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 94-94
Materials ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Lucía Barallat ◽  
María Arregui ◽  
Sandra Fernandez-Villar ◽  
Blanca Paniagua ◽  
Andrés Pascual-La Rocca

There is ample evidence to support the use of endocrowns to restore endodontic teeth. However, the influence of the position of the interproximal margins on fracture strength has not yet been studied. The aim was to determine the relationship between the apicocoronal position of the interproximal restorative margins and fracture resistance in nonvital teeth restored with CAD/CAM endocrown overlays. Forty extracted human maxillary premolars were prepared for endocrown overlay restorations without ferrule on the interproximal aspects and classified according to the position of the interproximal restoration margins in relation to the alveolar crest: 2 mm (group A), 1 mm (group B), 0.5 mm (group C), and 0 mm (group D). Fracture strength was measured using a universal testing machine applying a compressive force to the longitudinal tooth axis. Group A had a mean fracture resistance of 859.61 (±267.951) N, group B 1053.9 (±333.985) N, group C 1124.6 (±291.172) N, and group D 780.67 (±183.269) N, with statistical differences between groups. Group C had the highest values for fracture strength compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). The location of the interproximal margins appears to influence the fracture resistance of CAD/CAM endocrown overlays. A distance of 0.5 mm between the interproximal margin and the alveolar crest was associated with increased fracture resistance.


Author(s):  
Abdulrahman Alhaddad ◽  
Samar Abuzinadah ◽  
Abdullah Al-Otaibi ◽  
Abrar Alotaibi ◽  
Mohsen Alfkih ◽  
...  

Background: Zirconia-based restorations have become more popular in dentistry during the last two decades. Patients choose metal-free restorations, preferring materials with similar attributes to natural teeth and similar light scattering characteristics, resulting in a nice esthetic appearance. Restoring a root canal treated teeth is one of the hot topics today. endo crown materials can be either; feldspathic, glass-ceramic, monolithic hybrid ceramic or composite material. Considering the marginal gap of endocrown, an important cause of failure of treatment, the current study evaluated the marginal gap of CAD‐CAM concocted endo-crowns. Materials and Methods: This research is an analysis systemic review study was conducted between January 2020 and October 2021. We followed the PRISMA principles and recorded this systematic review using the PROSPERO database to find and identify published literature related to the marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM-fabricated endocrown. The search will include all relevant articles through the end of 2021. Finally, 24 papers on marginal clearance and fracture resistance in coronary arteries were reviewed. Results: The electronic database search yielded 98 studies that were relevant. After cross-referencing, further seven studies were added. After a full-text analysis and duplicate reduction, 74 of the 98 articles were eliminated. 5 clinical (prospective) studies, 19 in vitro studies were found. Conclusion: This analysis of the recent literature on the marginal seating integrity and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM made-up endo-crowns showed that the endo-crown had superior marginal seating integrity than classical full crown. CAM/CAM showed statistically significant higher mean fracture resistance than MAD/MAM.


2020 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 103326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Zacher ◽  
Robert Bauer ◽  
Thomas Strasser ◽  
Martin Rosentritt

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noha Badran ◽  
Sanaa Abdel Kader ◽  
Fayza Alabbassy

Statement of Problem. In some clinical situations, the vertical length of either a prepared tooth or an implant abutment is short, while the occlusal clearance to be restored by a porcelain crown is large. Incisal thickness of the veneering porcelain should be considered to prevent mechanical failure of the crown. Purpose. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of two different incisal veneering porcelain thickness on the fracture resistance of the anterior all-ceramic CAD/CAM zirconia crown system as compared with the conventionally used metal ceramic crown system. Method. CAD/CAM zirconia all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns were fabricated on the prepared dies with standardized dimensions and designs using standardized methods according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All crowns were then adhesively luted with resin-based cement (Multilink cement system), subjected to thermal cycling and cyclic loading, and were loaded until fracture using the universal testing machine to indicate the fracture resistance for each crown material in each veneering thickness. Results. Statistical analysis was carried out, and the results showed that the fracture resistance of the nickel-chromium metal ceramic group was significantly higher than that of the CAD/CAM zirconia all-ceramic group. Also, the fracture resistance of crowns with 1.5 mm incisal veneering thickness was significantly higher than those with 3 mm incisal veneering thickness in both groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the fracture mode of the two groups where 50% of the total specimens demonstrated Mode II (veneer chipping), while 35% demonstrated Mode I (visible crack) and only 15% demonstrated Mode III (bulk fracture). Conclusion. High failure load values were demonstrated by the specimens in this study, which suggest sufficient strength of both incisal veneering thickness in both crown systems to withstand clinical applications; however, the fracture patterns still underline the requirement of a core design that support a consistent thickness of the veneering ceramic, and it is recommended to conduct long-term prospective clinical studies to confirm findings reported in the present study.


2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 828-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua A. Manchester ◽  
Kwok-Hung Chung ◽  
James S. Brudvik ◽  
Van Ramos ◽  
Yen-Wei Chen

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohji Nagata ◽  
Noriyuki Wakabayashi ◽  
Hidekazu Takahashi ◽  
Pekka K Vallittu ◽  
Lippo VJ Lassila

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomotoshi Masuda ◽  
Syuntaro Nomoto ◽  
Toru Sato ◽  
Yuuhei Kanda ◽  
Takanori Sakai ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document