Extraperitoneal resection of the right colon for locally advanced colon cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e56-e59 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Taflampas ◽  
B. J. Moran
2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Wook Cho ◽  
Ryung-Ah Lee ◽  
Soon Sup Chung ◽  
Kwang Ho Kim

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Schootman ◽  
Matthew Mutch ◽  
T. Loux ◽  
J. M. Eberth ◽  
N. O. Davidson

AbstractPatients with locally advanced colon cancer have worse outcomes. Guidelines of various organizations are conflicting about the use of laparoscopic colectomy (LC) in locally advanced colon cancer. We determined whether patient outcomes of LC and open colectomy (OC) for locally advanced (T4) colon cancer are comparable in all colon cancer patients, T4a versus T4b patients, obese versus non-obese patients, and tumors located in the ascending, descending, and transverse colon. We used data from the 2013–2015 American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Patients were diagnosed with nonmetastatic pT4 colon cancer, with or without obstruction, and underwent LC (n = 563) or OC (n = 807). We used a composite outcome score (mortality, readmission, re-operation, wound infection, bleeding transfusion, and prolonged postoperative ileus); length of stay; and length of operation. Patients undergoing LC exhibited a composite outcome score that was 9.5% lower (95% CI − 15.4; − 3.5) versus those undergoing OC. LC patients experienced a 11.3% reduction in postoperative ileus (95% CI − 16.0; − 6.5) and an average of 2 days shorter length of stay (95% CI − 2.9; − 1.0). Patients undergoing LC were in the operating room an average of 13.5 min longer (95% CI 1.5; 25.6). We found no evidence for treatment heterogeneity across subgroups (p > 0.05). Patients with locally advanced colon cancer who receive LC had better overall outcomes and shorter lengths of stay compared with OC patients. LC was equally effective in obese/nonobese patients, in T4a/T4b patients, and regardless of the location of the tumor.


Author(s):  
Rathin Gosavi ◽  
Clemente Chia ◽  
Michael Michael ◽  
Alexander G. Heriot ◽  
Satish K. Warrier ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Alsabilah ◽  
W. R. Kim ◽  
N. K. Kim

Background and Aims: There is a demand for a better understanding of the vascular structures around the right colonic area. Although right hemicolectomy with the recent concept of meticulous lymph node dissection is a standardized procedure for malignant diseases among most surgeons, variations in the actual anatomical vascular are not well understood. The aim of the present review was to present a detailed overview of the vascular variation pertinent to the surgery for right colon cancer. Materials and Methods: Medical literature was searched for the articles highlighting the vascular variation relevant to the right colon cancer surgery. Results: Recently, there have been many detailed studies on applied surgical vascular anatomy based on cadaveric dissections, as well as radiological and intraoperative examinations to overcome misconceptions concerning the arterial supply and venous drainage to the right colon. Ileocolic artery and middle colic artery are consistently present in all patients arising from the superior mesenteric artery. Even though the ileocolic artery passes posterior to the superior mesenteric vein in most of the cases, in some cases courses anterior to the superior mesenteric artery. The right colic artery is inconsistently present ranging from 63% to 10% across different studies. Ileocolic vein and middle colic vein is always present, while the right colic vein is absent in 50% of patients. The gastrocolic trunk of Henle is present in 46%–100% patients across many studies with variation in the tributaries ranging from bipodal to tetrapodal. Commonly, it is found that the right colonic veins, including the right colic vein, middle colic vein, and superior right colic vein, share the confluence forming the gastrocolic trunk of Henle in a highly variable frequency and different forms. Conclusion: Understanding the incidence and variations of the vascular anatomy of right side colon is of crucial importance. Failure to recognize the variation during surgery can result in troublesome bleeding especially during minimal invasive surgery.


2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 1063-1066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad N. Hakimi ◽  
David K. Rosing ◽  
Bruce E. Stabile ◽  
Beverley A. Petrie

Direct invasion of colorectal adenocarcinoma into adjacent structures occurs frequently, but only rarely is the duodenum involved. This study was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of en bloc resection of locally advanced right colon carcinoma invading the duodenum. A retrospective review of 49 patients with locally advanced colon cancer, surgically managed between 2000 and 2005, was performed. Forty-six patients underwent en bloc resection of colon and adjacent organs not involving the duodenum. Three patients with duodenal invasion underwent en bloc partial duodenectomy. The mean operative blood loss, length of stay, postoperative morbidity, and mortality compare favorably between these two groups of patients. Of the 46 patients with en bloc resection of other organs, 27 are alive at 12 to 60 months follow up. Two patients with duodenal invasion are alive without recurrence at 15 and 20 months follow up. En bloc resection of colon cancer invading the duodenum can be performed safely because morbidity and mortality rates are comparable to those attending extended resections of other locally advanced colon carcinomas. Overall survival in patients who underwent surgery with curative intent justifies en bloc duodenal resection in selected patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hampig Raphael Kourie ◽  
Joseph Gharios ◽  
Joseph Kattan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document