Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided versus computed tomography‐guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: A meta‐analysis

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) is used for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs), but the diagnostic yield is not adequate. Cone-beam computed tomography-derived augmented fluoroscopy (CBCT-AF) can be utilized to assess the location of PPLs and biopsy devices, and has the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of bronchoscopic techniques. The purpose of this study was to verify the contribution of CBCT-AF to EBUS-TBB. Methods: Patients who underwent EBUS-TBB for diagnosis of PPLs were enrolled. The navigation success rate and diagnostic yield were used to evaluate the effectiveness of CBCT-AF in EBUS-TBB. Results: In this study, 236 patients who underwent EBUS-TBB for PPL diagnosis were enrolled. One hundred fifteen patients were in CBCT-AF group and 121 were in non-AF group. The navigation success rate was significantly higher in the CBCT-AF group (96.5% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.006). The diagnostic yield was even better in the CBCT-AF group when the target lesion was small in size (68.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.026 for lesions ≤10 mm and 77.5% vs. 46.4%, p = 0.016 for lesions 10–20 mm, respectively). The diagnostic yield of the two study groups became similar when the procedures with a failure of navigation were excluded. The procedure-related complication rate was similar between the two study groups. Conclusion: CBCT-AF is safe, and effectively enhances the navigation success rate, thereby increasing the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBB for PPLs.

Download Full-text

Endobronchial ultrasound plus fluoroscopy-guided biopsy compared to fluoroscopy-guided transbronchial biopsy for obtaining samples of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Annals of Thoracic Medicine ◽

10.4103/atm.atm_298_16 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 114 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Shenglin Ma ◽

Jian Ye ◽

Ruifeng Zhang ◽

Limin Wang ◽

Weizhong Jin

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Transbronchial Biopsy ◽

Endobronchial Ultrasound ◽

Pulmonary Lesions ◽

Guided Biopsy ◽

Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Radial endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.727290231.793551451 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Elaine Dumoulin

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Endobronchial Ultrasound ◽

Pulmonary Lesions ◽

Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Derived Augmented Fluoroscopy Combined with Endobronchial Ultrasound in Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

Respiration ◽

10.1159/000515181 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Kai-Lun Yu ◽

Shun-Mao Yang ◽

Huan-Jang Ko ◽

Hui-Yu Tsai ◽

Jen-Chung Ko ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Computed Tomography ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽

Diagnostic Yield ◽

Endobronchial Ultrasound ◽

Cone Beam ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Pulmonary Lesions ◽

Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

Background: The diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) using radial endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) remains challenging without navigation systems. Cone-beam computed tomography-derived augmented fluoroscopy (CBCT-AF) represents a recently developed technique, and its clinical utility remains to be investigated. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy (TBB) using a combination of CBCT-AF and radial EBUS. Methods: We recruited consecutive patients with PPLs who underwent radial EBUS-guided TBB, with or without AF, between October 2018 and July 2019. Following propensity score 1:1 matching, we recorded the procedure-related data and measured their efficacy and safety. Results: While 72 patients received EBUS-plus-AF, 235 patients received EBUS only. We included 53 paired patients following propensity score matching. The median size of lesions was 2.8 and 2.9 cm in the EBUS-plus-AF group and EBUS-only group, respectively. Diagnostic yield was higher in the former group (75.5 vs. 52.8%; p = 0.015). The diagnostic yield for the EBUS-plus-AF group was significantly higher for lesions ≤30 mm (73.5 vs. 36.1%; p = 0.002). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the complication rates (3.8 vs. 5.7%; p = 1.000). Twenty-four nodules (45.3%) were invisible by fluoroscopy in the EBUS-plus-AF group. All of them were identifiable on CBCT images and successfully annotated for AF. The mean radiation dose of total procedure, CBCT, and fluoroscopy was 19.59, 16.4, and 3.17 Gy cm2, respectively. Conclusions: TBB using a combination of CBCT-AF and EBUS resulted in a satisfactory diagnostic yield and safety.

Download Full-text