Effectiveness and Safety of Transthoracic Ultrasound in Guiding Percutaneous Needle Biopsy in the Lung and Comparison vs. CT Scan in Assessing Morphology of Subpleural Consolidations

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to conduct a prospective analysis on the diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle biopsy (TUS-PNB) for the histological assessment of peripheral lung lesions and to assess the performance of transthoracic ultrasound (TUS) examination vs. chest CT (gold standard) in the differentiation between malignant and benign peripheral lung lesions. (2) Methods: A total of 961 consecutive patients with subpleural pulmonary lesions were enrolled. All the patients received a CT scan with contrast; 762 patients underwent TUS-PTNB for suspicion of malignancy, and the remaining 199 enrolled patients underwent only TUS examination as a part of routine follow-up for known non-malignant subpleural consolidations. (3) Results: Among the 762 TUS-guided biopsies, there were 627 (82.28%) malignant lesions, 82 (10.76%) benign lesions, and 53 (6.96%) indeterminate lesions. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 93.04%. The rates of pneumothorax not requiring chest-tube insertion and self-limited hemoptysis were 0.79 and 0.26%, respectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on the benign or malignant nature of the subpleural consolidations. On TUS, both malignant and benign lesions showed mostly irregular margins and a hypoechoic pattern, but no differences were assessed in terms of sonographic margins and pattern between the two groups. There was poor agreement between TUS and chest CT in assessing air bronchograms and necrotic areas. The only finding in the detection of which TUS showed superiority compared to chest-CT was pleural effusion. (4) Conclusions: TUS-PNB was confirmed to be an effective and safe diagnostic method for peripheral pulmonary consolidation, but their sonographic pattern did not allow to rule out a malignant nature. A pre-operative evaluation on CT images, combined with the possibility of performing additional immunohistochemical and cytological investigations and the experience of the medical staff, may improve the diagnostic yield of TUS-guided biopsies.

Transthoracic Ultrasound in Infectious Organizing Pneumonia: A Useful Guide for Percutaneous Needle Biopsy

In patients presenting with classical features of CAP (i.e., new peripheral pulmonary consolidations and symptoms including fever, cough, and dyspnea), a clinical response to the appropriate therapy occurs in few days. When clinical improvement has not occurred and chest imaging findings are unchanged or worse, a more aggressive approach is needed in order to exclude other non-infective lesions (including neoplasms). International guidelines do not currently recommend the use of transthoracic ultrasound (TUS) as an alternative to chest X-ray (CXR) or chest computed tomography (CT) scan for the diagnosis of CAP. However, a fundamental role for TUS has been established as a guide for percutaneous needle biopsy (US-PNB) in pleural and subpleural lesions. In this retrospective study, we included 36 consecutive patients whose final diagnosis, made by a US-guided percutaneous needle biopsy (US-PTNB), was infectious organizing pneumonia (OP). Infective etiology was confirmed by additional information from microbiological and cultural studies or with a clinical follow-up of 6–12 months after a second-line antibiotic therapy plus corticosteroids. All patients have been subjected to a chest CT and a systematic TUS examination before biopsy. This gave us the opportunity to explore TUS performance in assessing CT findings of infective OP. TUS sensitivity and specificity in detecting air bronchogram and necrotic areas were far lower than those of CT scan. Conversely, TUS showed superiority in the detection of pleural effusion. Although ultrasound findings did not allow the characterization of chronic subpleural lesions, TUS confirmed to be a valid diagnostic aid for guiding percutaneous needle biopsy of subpleural consolidations.

Pathological Examination and Differential Diagnosis of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Opacities by CT-Guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy

In order to explore the pathological examination and differential diagnosis of pulmonary ground-glass opacities (GGO) with CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy (CTPNB), this study retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 120 cases of patients who were diagnosed with pulmonary GGO and underwent CTPNB in a hospital designated by this study from December 2014 to December 2018. The results showed that all the 120 cases of patients were successfully punctured at one time and obtained sufficient tissue specimens with the puncture success rate and diagnostic accuracy both of 100%, being able to make a clear qualitative diagnosis. Among them, 30 cases were malignant lesions including 14 cases of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and 16 cases of metastatic carcinoma; 90 cases were benign lesions including 52 cases of hematogenous pulmonary tuberculosis, 14 cases of sarcoidosis, 12 cases of silicosis and coal workers’ pneumoconiosis, 6 cases of interstitial pneumonia, 4 cases of alveolar proteinosis, and 2 case of allergic pneumonia. The complications of the 120 patients during the treatment included 8 cases of pneumothorax with an incidence of 6.67% (8/120), in which 2 case had the pulmonary tissue compression rate of about 25% and the other cases had no obvious perceived symptoms and required no special treatment, and 10 cases of hemoptysis with an incidence of 8.33% (10/120), whose symptoms disappeared after the treatment with batroxobin, and had no serious symptoms such as air embolism complication. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CTPNB in the diagnosis of malignant pulmonary GGO were 83.67% (82/98), 100% (22/22), and 86.67% (104/120), respectively, without statistically significant differences in diagnostic efficacy (P > 0.05). In summary, the CTPNB for the diagnosis of malignant pulmonary GGO has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, and the CTPNB is also the simplest and most important approach to obtain effective pathological examinations and differential diagnoses of pulmonary GGO, which has simple operation, high accuracy and few complications, and has high application value for the qualitative diagnosis of pulmonary GGO.