scholarly journals The Establishment of Research Ethics Consultation Services (RECS): An Emerging Research Resource

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer B. McCormick ◽  
Richard R. Sharp ◽  
Abigale L. Ottenberg ◽  
Carson R. Reider ◽  
Holly A. Taylor ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Kenji Matsui ◽  
Yusuke Inoue ◽  
Hiroaki Yanagawa ◽  
Tadao Takano

AbstractResearch ethics consultation services (RECS), which function as an advisory service to facilitate the resolution of complex ethical issues in clinical research, have been proliferating over the last decade. However, the qualification of an individual who provides RECS, or “a research ethics consultant,” has not been thoroughly investigated, in contrast to healthcare ethics consultants, whose core competencies have been discussed and clarified to a great extent. In this study, we investigated core competencies necessary for research ethics consultants, referring to the core competency models of ethics consultants developed in the healthcare practice context, and propose a competency model for research ethics consultants.


2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. W4-W6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mildred K. Cho ◽  
Sara L. Tobin ◽  
Henry T. Greely ◽  
Jennifer McCormick ◽  
Angie Boyce ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (118) ◽  
pp. 118cm1-118cm1 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Havard ◽  
M. K. Cho ◽  
D. Magnus

2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 615-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Sharp ◽  
Holly A. Taylor ◽  
Margaret A. Brinich ◽  
Mary M. Boyle ◽  
Mildred Cho ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hiroaki Yanagawa ◽  
Rumi Katashima ◽  
Chiho Sato ◽  
Kenshi Takechi ◽  
Hiroshi Nokihara ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marion Danis

This chapter provides a history of the development of research ethics consultation (REC) and an evaluation of its role in the conduct of research with human participants. It provides a brief overview of how and where REC is currently practiced. It also reviews and engages current debates on the appropriate methods and purpose of REC. Controversies are addressed, including the relationship of REC to research review committees, competency requirements for REC, the appropriate level of confidentiality of REC recommendations, who should have access to RECs, and handling of divergence between ethics guidance and the law. Finally, it explores the question of appropriate breadth of REC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document