scholarly journals REGN1908‐1909 monoclonal antibodies block Fel d 1 in cat allergic subjects: Translational pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Kamal ◽  
Robert Dingman ◽  
Claire Q. Wang ◽  
Ching‐Ha Lai ◽  
Manoj Rajadhyaksha ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (11) ◽  
pp. 1107-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Ternant ◽  
Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant ◽  
Christophe Passot ◽  
Denis Mulleman ◽  
Gilles Paintaud

mAbs ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 724-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah L. Mortensen ◽  
Saileta Prabhu ◽  
Eric G. Stefanich ◽  
Saloumeh Kadkhodayan-Fischer ◽  
Thomas R. Gelzleichter ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Bagnasco ◽  
Enrico Heffler ◽  
Elisa Testino ◽  
Giovanni Passalacqua ◽  
Giorgio Walter Canonica

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 1180
Author(s):  
Danuta Szkutnik-Fiedler

In the last few years, there have been significant advances in migraine management and prevention. Lasmiditan, ubrogepant, rimegepant and monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab) are new drugs that were launched on the US pharmaceutical market; some of them also in Europe. This publication reviews the available worldwide references on the safety of these anti-migraine drugs with a focus on the possible drug–drug (DDI) or drug–food interactions. As is known, bioavailability of a drug and, hence, its pharmacological efficacy depend on its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, which may be altered by drug interactions. This paper discusses the interactions of gepants and lasmiditan with, i.a., serotonergic drugs, CYP3A4 inhibitors, and inducers or breast cancer resistant protein (BCRP) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors. In the case of monoclonal antibodies, the issue of pharmacodynamic interactions related to the modulation of the immune system functions was addressed. It also focuses on the effect of monoclonal antibodies on expression of class Fc gamma receptors (FcγR).


Bioanalysis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (19) ◽  
pp. 1405-1425
Author(s):  
Karen AM de Jong ◽  
Suse J van Breugel ◽  
Michel JX Hillebrand ◽  
Hilde Rosing ◽  
Alwin DR Huitema ◽  
...  

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are rapidly taking over the treatment of many malignancies, and an astonishing number of mAbs is in development. This causes a high demand for quantification of mAbs in biomatrices both for measuring therapeutic mAb concentrations and to support pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies. Conventionally, ligand-binding assays are used for these purposes, but LC–MS is gaining popularity. Although intact (top-down) and subunit (middle-down) mAb quantification is reported, signature peptide (bottom-up) quantification is currently most advantageous. This review provides an overview of the reported bottom-up mAb quantification methods in biomatrices as well as general recommendations regarding signature peptide and internal standard selection, reagent use and optimization of digestion in bottom-up quantification methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document