scholarly journals Availability and effectiveness of decision aids for supporting shared decision making in patients with advanced colorectal and lung cancer: Results from a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inge Spronk ◽  
Maartje C. Meijers ◽  
Marianne J. Heins ◽  
Anneke L. Francke ◽  
Glyn Elwyn ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (4) ◽  
pp. A1732
Author(s):  
Mayuko Fukunaga ◽  
FCCP ◽  
Kyle Halligan ◽  
Jennifer Kodela ◽  
Shaun Toomey ◽  
...  


Author(s):  
Shelby R Sferra ◽  
Joyce S Cheng ◽  
Zachary Boynton ◽  
Verdi DiSesa ◽  
Larry R Kaiser ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Shared decision making (SDM) preceding lung cancer screening is important for populations that are underrepresented in lung cancer screening trials. Current evidence-based guidelines; however, do not address personal risk and outcomes in underrepresented populations. This study compared two SDM decision aids (Option Grids and Shouldiscreen.com) for SDM efficacy, decision regret and knowledge. Methods We conducted a prospective trial of lung cancer screening patients (N = 237) randomized to SDM with Option Grids or Shouldiscreen.com. To evaluate the SDM process after lung cancer screening, patients answered two questionnaires: CollaboRATE and Decision Regret. Patients also completed a questionnaire to test their knowledge of lung cancer screening. Results Patients were predominantly African American (61.6%), though multiple races, varying education levels and equal genders were represented. Patients in both Option Grids and Shouldiscreen.com groups reported favorable SDM experiences (P = 0.60) and equivalent knowledge about lung cancer screening (P = 0.43). Patients using Shouldiscreen.com had less knowledge regarding the potential complications of subsequent testing (P = 0.02). Shouldiscreen.com patients had increased regret regarding their decision to pursue screening (P = 0.02). Conclusions Option Grids and Shouldiscreen.com both facilitated a meaningful SDM process. However, Option Grids patients experienced decreased decision regret and enhanced knowledge of the potential complications of screening.



2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Wieringa ◽  
Marleen Kunneman ◽  
Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez ◽  
Victor M. Montori ◽  
Maartje de Wit ◽  
...  




2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 920-924
Author(s):  
Aaron Alokozai ◽  
David N Bernstein ◽  
Linsen T Samuel ◽  
Atul F Kamath

There are limited published studies on patient engagement, including shared decision-making, in adolescents and young adults with complex congenital or post-traumatic hip disorders. Despite the limited number of papers, we aim to clearly summarize what is currently available in the literature using a systematic review approach. We hope this serves as a call to action and catalyst for more work in this field. Future research must focus on awareness of what matters most to patients (values), and the development, implementation, and barriers to the use of decision aids and patient engagement optimization specific to hip disease in young adults.



2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 975-987.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olaf P. Geerse ◽  
Mariken E. Stegmann ◽  
Huib A.M. Kerstjens ◽  
Thijo Jeroen N. Hiltermann ◽  
Marie Bakitas ◽  
...  


Author(s):  
Britta Grüne ◽  
Maximilian C. Kriegmair ◽  
Maximilian Lenhart ◽  
Maurice S. Michel ◽  
Johannes Huber ◽  
...  


Author(s):  
Sanjush Dalmia ◽  
Florien Boele ◽  
Kate Absolom ◽  
Alessandro Brunelli ◽  
Kevin Franks ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document