scholarly journals Systematic review of the effect of aquatic therapeutic exercise in breast cancer survivors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Mur‐Gimeno ◽  
Paula Postigo‐Martin ◽  
Irene Cantarero‐Villanueva ◽  
Raquel Sebio‐Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Therapeutic Exercise

scholarly journals Updated systematic review of exercise studies in breast cancer survivors: attention to the principles of exercise training

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 504-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E Neil-Sztramko ◽  
Kerri M Winters-Stone ◽  
Kelcey A Bland ◽  
Kristin L Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Exercise Training ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Exercise Prescription ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectivesTo update our previous evaluation of the exercise interventions used in randomised controlled trials of breast cancer survivors in relation to (1) the application of the principles of exercise training in the exercise prescription; (2) the reporting of the components of the exercise prescription; and (3) the reporting of adherence of participants to the prescribed interventions.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesThe OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus electronic databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2017.Eligibility criteriaRandomised controlled trials of at least 4 weeks of aerobic and/or resistance exercise in women diagnosed with breast cancer, reporting on physical fitness or body composition outcomes.ResultsSpecificity was appropriately applied by 84%, progression by 29%, overload by 38% and initial values by 67% of newly identified studies. Reversibility was reported by 3% anddiminishing returns by 22% of newly identified studies. No studies reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescribed intervention in the results. Reporting of reversibility has increased from 2010, but no other improvements in reporting were noted from the previous review.Summary/ConclusionNo studies of exercise in women with breast cancer attended to all principles of exercise training, or reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescription in the results. Full reporting of the exercise prescribed and completed is essential for study replication in research and translating research findings into the community, and should be prioritised in future trials.

scholarly journals Adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy among breast cancer survivors in clinical practice: a systematic review

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin C. Murphy ◽  
L. Kay Bartholomew ◽  
Melissa Y. Carpentier ◽  
Shirley M. Bluethmann ◽  
Sally W. Vernon
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy

scholarly journals Resistance Training in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review of Exercise Programs

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (18) ◽  
pp. 6511
Author(s):  
Leidy Sofía Montaño-Rojas ◽  
Ena Monserrat Romero-Pérez ◽  
Carlos Medina-Pérez ◽  
María Mercedes Reguera-García ◽  
José Antonio de Paz
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Resistance Training ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Evidence Database ◽  
Meta Analyses

The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of resistance training (RT) programs for breast cancer survivors (BCS). A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, the Cochrane Breast Cancer Specialised Register of the Cochrane Library, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and Scopus, with the aim of identifying all published studies on RT and BCS from 1 January 1990 to 6 December 2019, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The risk of bias in the studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0). Sixteen trials were included for qualitative analysis. More than half of the trials do not adequately report the characteristics that make up the exercise program. The maximal strength was the most frequently monitored manifestation of strength, evaluated mainly as one-repetition maximum (1RM). Resistance training was performed on strength-training machines, twice a week, using a load between 50% and 80% of 1RM. The trials reported significant improvement in muscle strength, fatigue, pain, quality of life, and minor changes in aerobic capacity.

Uterine cancer in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 180 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akemi T. Wijayabahu ◽  
Kathleen M. Egan ◽  
Lusine Yaghjyan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Uterine Cancer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document