scholarly journals Barriers and facilitators to “moving on” from early intervention in psychosis services

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 914-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Woodward ◽  
Sandra Bucci ◽  
Dawn Edge ◽  
Katherine Berry
Keyword(s):  
Early Intervention ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Early Intervention In Psychosis

scholarly journals Early intervention in psychosis: p-values, policy, and politics

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Rosenheck
Keyword(s):  
Early Intervention ◽  
P Values ◽  
Early Intervention In Psychosis

Programma 2000: Celebrating 10 Years of Activity of an Italian Pilot Programme on Early Intervention in Psychosis

2008 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 1003-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Cocchi ◽  
Anna Meneghelli ◽  
Antonio Preti
Keyword(s):  
Early Intervention ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Global Functioning ◽  
Adult Intelligence Scale ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Early Intervention In Psychosis

Objective: This paper describes the structure and the organization of the single Italian programme specifically targeted at the early detection of and interventions for subjects at onset of or at high risk of psychosis, Programma 2000. Methods: Programma 2000 is a comprehensive multi-modal protocol of early intervention in psychosis, set up in Milan in 1999. The service has been very active since its opening, and at the time of writing (spring (April) 2008), more than 300 young patients have been evaluated through a detailed protocol that embraces Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Cognitive Behavioural Assessment 2.0, Disability Assessment Schedule, Camberwell Family Interview, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and the Early Recognition Inventory Retrospective Assessment of Symptoms. The treatment includes psychoeducation, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), both structured and unstructured psychosocial interventions and pharmacotherapy, when necessary. Results: The programme focuses on young people aged 17–30 years: to date, a total of 132 subjects with definite psychosis or within the high-risk category have been enrolled in treatment after assessment. Patients with first-episode psychosis were, on average and expectedly, more severe than those in the at-risk group, and were more likely to be prescribed antipsychotic drugs. A large majority of patients in both groups received tailored CBT; individual sessions of skills training were provided to two-thirds of patients. In both groups, improvement was found in both the BPRS and HoNOS, and in the level of global functioning as assessed on Global Assessment of Functioning at 6 month and 1 year follow up. Global functioning was more sensitive to change than symptom severity, reflecting the intensive and personalized efforts to improve social and role functioning in patients. Conclusions: Programma 2000 is still in development but it has already gained the support of therapists and other relevant people involved in the life of subjects at onset, or at high risk of psychosis.

scholarly journals Administrative incidence of psychosis assessed in an early intervention service in England: first epidemiological evidence from a diverse, rural and urban setting

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 949-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Cheng ◽  
J. B. Kirkbride ◽  
B. R. Lennox ◽  
J. Perez ◽  
K. Masson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Intervention ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Clinical Epidemiology ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Service Planning ◽  
Urban Setting ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Urban Settings ◽  
Rural And Urban ◽  
Early Intervention In Psychosis

BackgroundEarly Intervention in Psychosis Services (EIS) for young people in England experiencing first-episode psychosis (FEP) were commissioned in 2002, based on an expected incidence of 15 cases per 100 000 person-years, as reported by schizophrenia epidemiology in highly urban settings. Unconfirmed reports from EIS thereafter have suggested higher than anticipated rates. The aim of this study was to compare the observed with the expected incidence and delineate the clinical epidemiology of FEP using epidemiologically complete data from the CAMEO EIS, over a 6-year period in Cambridgeshire, for a mixed rural–urban population.MethodA population-based study of FEP (ICD-10, F10–39) in people aged 17–35 years referred between 2002 and 2007; the denominator was estimated from mid-year census statistics. Sociodemographic variation was explored by Poisson regression. Crude and directly standardized rates (for age, sex and ethnicity) were compared with pre-EIS rates from two major epidemiological FEP studies conducted in urban English settings.ResultsA total of 285 cases met FEP diagnoses in CAMEO, yielding a crude incidence of 50 per 100 000 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 44.5–56.2]. Age- and sex-adjusted rates were raised for people from black ethnic groups compared with the white British [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 2.1, 95% CI 1.1–3.8]. Rates in our EIS were comparable with pre-EIS rates observed in more urban areas after age, sex and ethnicity standardization.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the incidence observed in EIS is far higher than originally anticipated and is comparable to rates observed in more urban settings prior to the advent of EIS. Sociodemographic variation due to ethnicity and other factors extend beyond urban populations. Our results have implications for psychosis aetiology and service planning.

Early intervention in psychosis: from Government prescription to clinical practice

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 243-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Holloway ◽  
Kathy Aitchison
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Early Intervention ◽  
Early Intervention In Psychosis

scholarly journals Ethnic Differences in Antipsychotic treatment responses in Early Intervention in Psychosis

The Physician ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Nandini Chakraborty ◽  
Shiraz Ahmed ◽  
Hannah Booth ◽  
Hawa Aswat
Keyword(s):  
Early Intervention ◽  
Ethnic Group ◽  
Ethnic Groups ◽  
Ethnic Differences ◽  
Antipsychotic Treatment ◽  
Electronic Patient Records ◽  
Treatment Responses ◽  
Ethnic Variations ◽  
Early Intervention In Psychosis ◽  
Best Responses

Background Ethnic variations in pathways to early intervention in psychosis (EIP) have been studied. However, it is important to explore the ethnic variations in response to pharmacological treatment in EIP. Aims To look at ethnic variation in response to antipsychotics. Method Electronic patient records in December 2018 were perused for: Sociodemographic details including ethnicity Prescribed antipsychotic and dosage to which the patient had responded Results White, Black and Asian ethnic groups responded mostly to Olanzapine. The largest proportion of the mixed ethnic group responded to Aripiprazole. The White and Asian groups showed the best responses to Lurasidone at 74 mg. There was a slight response in the mixed and other ethnic groups only at the higher dose of 111 mg. The medication has not been used with any benefit in the Black ethnic group. Conclusion The complex differences highlighted amongst ethnic responses to treatment make a case for multi-centric studies to further explore ethnic differences in early intervention treatments. This will help streamline offered treatments to maximise response in EIP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document