Sustained brain activation supporting stop-signal task performance

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1363-1369 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Hughes ◽  
T. W. Budd ◽  
W. R. Fulham ◽  
S. Lancaster ◽  
W. Woods ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 214-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niklas Johannes ◽  
Harm Veling ◽  
Thijs Verwijmeren ◽  
Moniek Buijzen

Abstract. Because more and more young people are constantly presented with the opportunity to access information and connect to others via their smartphones, they report to be in a state of permanent alertness. In the current study, we define such a state as smartphone vigilance, an awareness that one can always get connected to others in combination with a permanent readiness to respond to incoming smartphone notifications. We hypothesized that constantly resisting the urge to interact with their phones draws on response inhibition, and hence interferes with students’ ability to inhibit prepotent responses in a concurrent task. To test this, we conducted a preregistered experiment, employing a Bayesian sequential sampling design, where we manipulated smartphone visibility and smartphone notifications during a stop-signal task that measures the ability to inhibit prepotent responses. The task was constructed such that we could disentangle response inhibition from action selection. Results show that the mere visibility of a smartphone is sufficient to experience vigilance and distraction, and that this is enhanced when students receive notifications. Curiously enough, these strong experiences were unrelated to stop-signal task performance. These findings raise new questions about when and how smartphones can impact performance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 386 ◽  
pp. 112586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Gaillard ◽  
Susan L. Rossell ◽  
Sean P. Carruthers ◽  
Philip J. Sumner ◽  
Patricia T. Michie ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 320-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Jacobs ◽  
Stephen J. Kohut ◽  
Shan Jiang ◽  
Spyros P. Nikas ◽  
Alexandros Makriyannis ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 233 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinde E. Wiers ◽  
Christiane K. Gawron ◽  
Sonja Gröpper ◽  
Stephanie Spengler ◽  
Heiner Stuke ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Michael K. Yeung ◽  
Ami Tsuchida ◽  
Lesley K. Fellows

The frontal lobes have long been implicated in inhibitory control, but a full understanding of the underlying mechanisms remains elusive. The stop-signal task has been widely used to probe instructed response inhibition in cognitive neuroscience. The processes involved have been modeled and related to putative brain substrates. However, there has been surprisingly little human lesion research using this task, with the few existing studies implicating different prefrontal regions. Here, we tested the effects of focal prefrontal damage on stop-signal task performance in a large sample of people with chronic focal damage affecting the frontal lobes ( n = 42) and demographically matched healthy people ( n = 60). Patients with damage to the left lateral, right lateral, dorsomedial, or ventromedial frontal lobe had slower stop-signal RT compared to healthy controls. There were systematic differences in the patterns of impairment across frontal subgroups: Those with damage to the left or right lateral and dorsomedial frontal lobes, but not those with ventromedial frontal damage, were slower than controls to “go” as well as to stop. These findings suggest that multiple prefrontal regions make necessary but distinct contributions to stop-signal task performance. As a consequence, stop-signal RT slowing is not strongly localizing within the frontal lobes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document