Fast Fashion: A Case of Social Harm and State‐Corporate Crime

2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-369
Author(s):  
KATJA SIMONČIČ
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Social Harm ◽  
Fast Fashion

State-Corporate Crime and Social Harm in the Spanish Crisis

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilo Bernal ◽  
Alejandro Forero ◽  
Iñaki Rivera
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Social Harm

The Origins and Development of the Concept and Theory of State-Corporate Crime

2002 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald C. Kramer ◽  
Raymond J. Michalowski ◽  
David Kauzlarich
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Sociology Of Law ◽  
Social Harm ◽  
Directed Attention ◽  
Organizational Crime ◽  
Economic Production ◽  
Production And Distribution ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Political Governance

The important contributions made by Richard Quinney to the study of corporate crime and the sociology of law, crime, and justice have influenced the development of the concept of state-corporate crime. This concept has been advanced to examine how corporations and governments intersect to produce social harm. State-corporate crime is defined as criminal acts that occur when one or more institutions of political governance pursue a goal in direct cooperation with one or more institutions of economic production and distribution. The creation of this concept has directed attention to a neglected form of organizational crime and inspired numerous empirical studies and theoretical refinements.

CRIMINOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF CORPORATE CRIME IN HEALTH

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-99
Author(s):  
V.V. Pyvovarov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Criminological Analysis

Ethical Issues in the Fast Fashion Industry

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 660-665
Author(s):  
Chi Sheh ◽  
◽  
Peng Chan ◽  
Wen Jun Sim ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Business Ethics ◽  
Conceptual Model ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Fashion Industry ◽  
Fast Fashion ◽  
Life Event ◽  
Real Cost ◽  
Literature Reviews

Fast fashion is becoming more and more popular nowadays and this industry is growing rapidly. In order to supply to the big demand of fast fashion clothing, company will need to increase the production of the clothing in shorter time frame. Besides that, to out beat the competitor, company will provide more choices of clothing in cheaper price to the customers. By practicing these actions to increase the business profits, company is behaving unethical to the manufacturer of the cloth. Most consumers are not aware of these ethical issues. This paper is will used and tested the conceptual model of fast fashion business ethics based on literature reviews. The finding from this paper will manifest the “real cost” of a cheap and branded fast fashion clothing and will be supported by real life event that happened. However, after realizing the problems, some company did make some changes and the solutions are stated in the paper as well.

FASHION IS “ME TOO” STYLE IS “ONLY ME”: CONSUMER PREFERENCES TOWARDS FAST FASHION AND LUXURY FASHION

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-46
Author(s):  
Ya Yun (Avon) Tsai ◽  
◽  
Alastair Tombs
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Preferences ◽  
Fast Fashion

MATCHING BUSINESS MODELS THROUGH ADAPTATION IN BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS: HOW DO SUPPLIERS COPE WITH FAST FASHION?

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1529-1529
Author(s):  
Simone Guercini ◽  
◽  
Andrea Runfola
Keyword(s):  
Business Models ◽  
Business Relationships ◽  
Fast Fashion

Competition Policy and Price Fixing

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Kaplow
Keyword(s):  
Competition Policy ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
Direct Approach ◽  
Social Harm ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Oligopoly Theory ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Error Costs ◽  
Benefits And Costs ◽  
Desirable Behavior

Throughout the world, the rule against price fixing is competition law's most important and least controversial prohibition. Yet there is far less consensus than meets the eye on what constitutes price fixing, and prevalent understandings conflict with the teachings of oligopoly theory that supposedly underlie modern competition policy. This book offers a fresh, in-depth exploration of competition law's horizontal agreement requirement, presents a systematic analysis of how best to address the problem of coordinated oligopolistic price elevation, and compares the resulting direct approach to the orthodox prohibition. The book elaborates the relevant benefits and costs of potential solutions, investigates how coordinated price elevation is best detected in light of the error costs associated with different types of proof, and examines appropriate sanctions. Existing literature devotes remarkably little attention to these key subjects and instead concerns itself with limiting penalties to certain sorts of interfirm communications. Challenging conventional wisdom, the book shows how this circumscribed view is less well grounded in the statutes, principles, and precedents of competition law than is a more direct, functional proscription. More important, by comparison to the communications-based prohibition, the book explains how the direct approach targets situations that involve both greater social harm and less risk of chilling desirable behavior—and is also easier to apply.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document