scholarly journals How do community pharmacists conceptualise and operationalise self-care support of long-term conditions (LTCs)? An English cross-sectional survey

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oladapo J. Ogunbayo ◽  
Ellen I. Schafheutle ◽  
Christopher Cutts ◽  
Peter R. Noyce
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1720
Author(s):  
Zahra Alsairafi ◽  
Julie Mason ◽  
Natasha Davies ◽  
Molly Dennis ◽  
Gabrielle Pilgrim ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 64-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenni Burt ◽  
Martin Roland ◽  
Charlotte Paddison ◽  
David Reeves ◽  
John Campbell ◽  
...  

Objectives Among patients with long-term conditions, to determine the prevalence and benefits of care planning discussions and of care plans. Methods Data from the 2009/10 General Practice Patient Survey, a cross sectional survey of 5.5 million patients in England. Outcomes were patient reports of: care planning discussions; perceived benefit from care planning discussions and resultant care plans. Patient and practice variables were included in multilevel logistic regression to investigate predictors of each outcome. Results Half the respondents (49%) reported a long-term condition and were eligible to answer the care planning questions. Of these, 84% reported having a care planning discussion during the last 12 months and most reported some benefit. Only 12% who reported a care planning discussion also reported being told they had a care plan. Patients who reported having a care plan were more likely to report benefits from care planning discussions. Several factors predicted the reporting of care planning and care plans of which the most important was patients' reports of the quality of interpersonal care. Conclusions There is a gap between policy and current practice which might reflect uncertainty as to the benefits of care plans. There is, therefore, a need for rigorous evaluation of care plans.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 855-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed A. Mohammed ◽  
Jane Montague ◽  
Muhammad Faisal ◽  
Laura Lamming

Abstract In England, primary care patients have access to Patient Access Portals (PAPs), enabling them to book appointments, request repeat medication prescriptions, send/receive messages and review their medical records. Few studies have elicited user views and value of PAPs, especially in a publicly funded primary care setting. This study aimed to elicit the value users of PAPs place on online access to medical records and linked services. Secondary data analysis of the completed electronic survey (available 2 May 2015–27 June 2015) distributed via the EMIS PAP to all its registered users. EMIS designed the survey; responses were voluntary. There were 62,486 responders (95.7% self-completed). The PAP was mainly used for medication requests (86.3%) and online appointment bookings (78.4%), and, to a lesser extent, medical record viewing (18.3%) and messaging (9.5%). The majority (70%) reported a positive impact from using it. One in five rated it as their favourite online service second only to online banking. Almost three out of four responders stated that availability of online access would influence their move to another practice. Nonetheless, responders were reluctant to award a high monetary value to it. These findings correlated with the number of long-term conditions. The majority of users place a relatively high value, but not monetary value, on the PAP and report a positive impact from using it. The potential for PAPs to enhance patient experience, especially for those with long-term conditions, appears to be largely untapped. Research exploring the reasons for non-use is also required.


2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 1974-1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Kirk ◽  
Susan Beatty ◽  
Peter Callery ◽  
Linda Milnes ◽  
Steven Pryjmachuk

2021 ◽  
pp. 136749352110291
Author(s):  
Laurie Cave ◽  
Linda J Milnes ◽  
Gretl A McHugh

There is policy impetus for provision of self-care support (SCS) for children with long-term conditions (LTCs). However, it is not clear what SCS should consist of and how it can be delivered in routine care. This review aimed to synthesise the literature, specifically on SCS of diet and the gut as these components are essential for optimal growth and development and enhanced quality of life. Using an integrative review methodology, studies conducted between January 1990 and July 2020 were systematically identified and methodological quality assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Twenty-five studies were included. SCS of diet and the gut consisted of support in developing and applying specific knowledge and skills and practical help with incorporating the demands of self-care into everyday life. Key requisites for models of SCS in the context of delivery and uptake in routine care were starting early, keeping it going, being flexible and choosing appropriate outcomes. This review contributes new understanding on the provision of SCS of diet and the gut for school-age children with LTCs, including identification of gaps in the literature and further research needs.


2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Berzins ◽  
S. Reilly ◽  
J. Abell ◽  
J. Hughes ◽  
D. Challis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document