Intralesional and intravenous treatment of cutaneous B-cell lymphomas with the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab: report and follow-up of eight cases

2006 ◽  
Vol 155 (6) ◽  
pp. 1197-1200 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Kerl ◽  
C. Prins ◽  
J.H. Saurat ◽  
L.E. French
Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2755-2755
Author(s):  
Sabrina Donnou ◽  
Rym Ben Abdelwahed-Bagga ◽  
Jérémie Cosette ◽  
Hanane Ouakrim ◽  
Lucile Crozet ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2755 Background: Primary Central Nervous lymphomas (PCNSL), that comprise primary cerebral lymphoma (PCL) and primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL), are typically CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphomas that have no detectable disease outside the brain or eye. Rituximab (RTX), an anti-CD20 antibody, has demonstrated encouraging clinical benefit in systemic B-cell lymphomas as well as PCL and PIOL, however, the role of RTX in treatment of PCNSL/PIOL remains controversial, and these highly aggressive malignancies are often incurable with available therapies. Therefore, additional treatment options are needed. Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel, glycoengineered chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) that has a high affinity for FcγRIIIa (CD16) receptors, and therefore greater ADCC activity than RTX (Le Garff-Tavernier et al., 2011). Herein, we assess the antitumor effects of UTX compared to RTX in murine models of PCL and PIOL. Methods: The murine lymphoma B-cell line A20.IIA-GFP-hCD20 (H-2d) was injected into the right cerebral striatum (PCL model) or the vitreous (PIOL model) of adult BALB/c mice (H-2d); 7 days later, single doses of UTX were injected either into the tumor site intracerebrally (PCL) or intravitreously (PIOL), or at distance of the tumor site (intrathecally, PCL). RTX was used as a reference compound. Survival was monitored for injected mice for up to 100 days, and flow cytometric analyses were performed to assess tumor growth and T-cell infiltration. Results: In PCL and PIOL models, single doses of UTX had a marked antitumor effect more pronounced than that obtained with an equivalent dose of RTX. In the PCL model, there was an overall survival (OS) advantage with intracerebral injections of UTX compared to RTX (50% vs. 10%, n=10 in each group, p=0.0028). The reduction in tumor cells was correlated with an increased proportion of CD8+ T cells. Moreover, intrathecal injections of UTX increased OS compared to buffer solution. In the PIOL model, the absolute number of tumor cells analyzed 8 days after treatment had decreased more significantly (p=0.027) with UTX compared to the RTX group. This finding again confirmed the superiority of UTX in this setting. Conclusions: These results confirm that the novel, third-generation mAb, UTX has a sustained and greater antitumor effect than RTX on primary cerebral and intraocular lymphomas when assessed in vivo. Additional experiments evaluating the combination of UTX + methotrexate are ongoing. Clinical trials to evaluate UTX as an innovative therapeutic approach to treat primary cerebral and intraocular B-cell lymphomas are currently being evaluated. Disclosures: Jacquet: LFB Biotechnologies: Employment. Fridman:LFB Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Urbain:LFB Biotechnologies: Employment.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8032-8032 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Morschhauser ◽  
J. P. Leonard ◽  
L. Fayad ◽  
B. Coiffier ◽  
M. Petillon ◽  
...  

8032 Background: An open-label, multicenter study has shown that the humanized anti-CD20 antibody, IMMU-106 (hA20), which has framework regions of epratuzumab, has a good safety and efficacy profile in NHL pts when administered once-weekly × 4 at different doses. The trial is now focused on confirming the efficacy of lower doses (80–120 mg/m2/wk × 4). Methods: A total of 68 pts (35 male, 33 female; age 34–84) received hA20 at 750 (N=3), 375 (N=27), 200 (N=11), 120 (N=21), or 80 mg/m2 (N=6). They had follicular (FL, N=47) or other (N=21) B-cell NHL, were predominantly stage III/IV (N=47) at study entry, and had received 1–8 prior treatments (median, 2), including 1 (N=40) or more (N=21) rituximab regimens (without progression within 6 months). Results: Sixty- six pts completed all 4 infusions; 1 pt progressed during treatment and withdrew, while another pt with hives and chills after prior rituximab discontinued treatment after a similar episode at 1st infusion. hA20 was generally well tolerated, with shorter infusion times (typically 2 h initially and 1 h subsequently) at lower doses. Drug-related adverse events were transient, Grade 1–2, most occurring only at 1st infusion, and there was no evidence of HAHA in 54 pts now evaluated. Mean antibody serum levels increased with dose and infusions; serum clearance at 375 mg/m2 appears similar to rituximab. Currently, 48 pts with at least 12 wks follow-up were evaluated by Cheson criteria: 32 FL pts had 15 (47%) OR's with 7 (22%) CR/CRu's, even after 2–4 prior rituximab-regimens, and 17 non-FL pts had 6 (38%) OR's, with 1 CRu in a marginal zone NHL pt. At a median follow-up of 11 mo., 9/21 pts with ORs are continuing responses, including 4 long-lived responses (15–20 mo). The evaluated pts include 17 pts at 120 mg/m2 who had 5 (29%) ORs with 3 (17%) CR/CRu's. Responses at 80 mg/m2 remain to be evaluated, but B-cell depletion occurs after the 1st infusion even at this low dose. Conclusions: hA20 appears well-tolerated, with no evidence of significant adverse events other than minor infusion reactions, even at short infusion times. B-cell depletion and responses have occurred at all doses evaluated, with no clear-cut evidence of a dose-response. As such, the study is continuing to confirm the efficacy of lower doses. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2719-2719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
John P. Leonard ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
STephen J. Schuster ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: An open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study in patients with recurrent NHL was initially undertaken to establish the safety, tolerance, PK, and immunogenicity (HAHA) of humanized anti-CD20 antibody, IMMU-106 (hA20), administered once-weekly for 4 weeks at different doses. Additional patients have now been entered to confirm the efficacy of 120 and 375 mg/m2 dosing, and to determine the feasibility of using even lower hA20 doses. Methods: A total of 55 patients (23 male, 32 female; 51 Caucasian; 40–84 years old) received hA20 at 120 (N=21), 200 (N=6), 375 (N=25) or 750 mg/m2 (N=3). They had follicular (FL, N=37) or other (N=18) B-cell lymphomas, were predominantly stage III/IV (N=44) at study entry, and had received 1–7 prior treatments (median, 2), including 1 (N=34) or more (N=14) rituximab regimens (without progression within 6 months). Results: Fifty-two patients completed all 4 infusions, 2 are currently being treated, and one patient with hives and chills after prior rituximab discontinued treatment after similar NCI CTC v.3 grade 1–2 reactions at 1st hA20 infusion. hA20 was generally well tolerated with a median infusion time at the lowest dose of 120 mg/m2 of 2.2 h for 1st infusion and 1.2 h for subsequent infusions. Twenty-one patients had drug-related adverse events; these were all transient, mild-to-moderate (Grade 1–2) events, most occurring only at first infusion. No consistent pattern of abnormal laboratory changes occurred, and there was no evidence of immunogenicity in 29 patients now evaluated for HAHA. Mean antibody serum levels increased with dose and with repeated infusions, and limited post-treatment data indicate the serum clearance at 375 mg/m2 dosing is similar to rituximab. Even at 120 mg/m2, peripheral blood B-cell depletion occurred after the first infusion and persists after 4th infusion, with analysis continuing > 6 mo. Thirty-nine patients with at least 12 wks follow-up had one or more responses evaluated by Cheson criteria (Table), with all CR/CRu occurring in follicular lymphoma except for one patient with marginal zone lymphoma; 6 pts progressed by week 4. Of 18 pts with OR’s, 9 have continuing responses (median follow-up, 9 mos post-treatment), including 4 with long-lived responses (12–18 mos). Conclusions: hA20 is well tolerated, with no evidence of significant toxicity or pattern of adverse events other than minor infusion reactions, even at short infusion times. All dose levels studied so far, including the lowest dose of 120 mg/m2, resulted in B-cell depletion and objective responses (including CR/CRu), with no clear-cut evidence of dose response in efficacy. As such, further dose de-escalation is ongoing. Treatment Response hA20 Dose OR CR/CRu All patients (n = 39) 46% (18/39) 21% (8/39) 120 mg/m2 (n = 11) 36% (4/11) 27% (3/11) 200 mg/m2 (n = 6) 67% (4/6) 33% (2/6) 375 mg/m2 (n =19) 42% (8/19) 11% (2/19) 750 mg/m2 (n = 3) 67% (2/3) 33% (1/3)


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4924-4924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Y Cheung ◽  
Caroline Hamm ◽  
Michelle Suga ◽  
Mohammed Adie

Abstract Abstract 4924 For female patients treated with rituximab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, it is recommended to wait 12 months post-treatment before pregnancy to avoid fetal B cell depletion. We report a case of a 25 year old female with a history of Grade II follicular lymphoma, Stage III who was treated with CHOP/R and maintenance rituximab therapy which was stopped when she expressed intentions for pregnancy. However, she conceives within only 6 months after her last dose of rituximab. This prompts questions of risks to the fetus. Rituximab is a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody which targets and destroys normal and malignant CD20 positive B cells. As an IgG molecule, rituximab can cross the placenta, and has been documented to cause B cell depletion and immunosuppression in the fetus (McKeever et al, 2003). During treatment, high drug levels are detectable in the umbilical cord blood, and remains in the patient's blood between 3–6 months post-treatment (Pereg et al, 2007). The half life of rituximab varies with tumour burden and ranges from 3 – 19 days. B cell levels start to recover at 6 months post-treatment and are normal by 12 months. Hence, it is recommended by the manufacturer that pregnancies should be separated from rituximab use by a minimum of 12 months. Current literature regarding rituximab's safety in pregnancy is limited to animal studies and 10 case reports. When pregnant macaque cynomolgus females were exposed in 1st trimester, no teratogenic or embryotoxic effects were shown. There was a decrease in B cell levels but these were reversible by 179 days (McKeever et al., 2003). Among case reports, six involved women treated for hematological conditions. Of these cases, one was inadvertently exposed in 1st trimester and the fetus had B cell depletion that recovered to normal levels by 16 days (Kimby, 2004). All other cases were exposed in 2nd trimester of which two had transient B cell depletion that recovered by 4 months. All babies were healthy at birth, had normal antibody titres after their first vaccinations and normal childhood development at follow-up (Friedrich, 2006; Decker 2006). Four case reports involved rituximab use for non-hematological conditions; two cases of 1st trimester and two cases of 3rd trimester exposure. Only one 3rd trimester case reported transient fetal B cell depletion that recovered by 6 months (Klink, 2008). Again, all babies were healthy at birth and at follow-up, including normal antibody titres after vaccinations. From the cases reported, regardless of trimester exposure, the B cell depletion effect was only transient with no documented short-term or long-term effects on the baby's immune function and overall development. In this case, the patient stopped rituximab therapy 6 months prior to conception. There were no complications during pregnancy or delivery. Furthermore, a healthy baby boy was born at 42 weeks gestation with normal apgar scores, length at 75th percentile, and normal weight of 8 lbs 16 oz. Since the baby was clinically stable after delivery, B cell levels were not drawn. At 3 months old, the baby was healthy and had no difficulties with vaccinations to date. This is yet another case to add to the small literature base, and we hope it can help further inform the usage of rituximab during pregnancy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 1500-1508 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Olafsen ◽  
D. Betting ◽  
V. E. Kenanova ◽  
F. B. Salazar ◽  
P. Clarke ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. P168
Author(s):  
Maximillian Rosario ◽  
Bai Liu ◽  
Lin Kong ◽  
Stephanie E Schneider ◽  
Emily K Jeng ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 389-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Vose ◽  
B. K. Link ◽  
M. L. Grossbard ◽  
M. Czuczman ◽  
A. Grillo-Lopez ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of the combination of the chimeric anti-CD20 antibody Rituxan (rituximab, IDEC-C2B8; Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with previously untreated advanced aggressive B-cell NHL received six infusions of Rituxan (375 mg/m2 per dose) on day 1 of each cycle in combination with six doses of CHOP chemotherapy given on day 3 of each cycle. RESULTS: The ORR by investigator assessment confirmed by the sponsor was 94% (31 of 33 patients). Twenty patients experienced a complete response (CR) (61%), 11 patients had a partial response (PR) (33%), and two patients were classified as having progressive disease. In the 18 patients with an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score ≥ 2, the combination of Rituxan plus CHOP achieved an ORR of 89% and CR of 56%. The median duration of response and time to progression had not been reached after a median observation time of 26 months. Twenty-nine of 31 responding patients remained in remission during this follow-up period, including 15 of 16 patients with an IPI score ≥ 2. The most frequent adverse events attributed to Rituxan were fever and chills, primarily during the first infusion. Rituxan did not seem to compromise the ability of patients to tolerate CHOP; all patients completed the entire six courses of the combination. The bcl-2 translocation of blood or bone marrow was positive at baseline in 13 patients; 11 patients had follow-up specimens obtained (eight CR, three PR), and all had a negative bcl-2 status after therapy. Only one patient has reconverted to bcl-2 positivity, and all patients remain in clinical remission. CONCLUSION: This is the first report to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Rituxan chimeric anti-CD20 antibody in combination with standard-dose CHOP in the treatment of aggressive B-cell lymphoma. The clinical responses are at least comparable to those achieved with CHOP alone with no significant added toxicity. The presence or absence of the bcl-2 translocation did not affect the ability of patients to achieve a CR with this regimen. The ability to achieve sustained remissions in patients with an IPI score ≥ 2 warrants further investigation with a randomized study.


1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 3270-3278 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Y Liu ◽  
J F Eary ◽  
S H Petersdorf ◽  
P J Martin ◽  
D G Maloney ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a promising treatment approach for B-cell lymphomas. This is our first opportunity to report long-term follow-up data and late toxicities in 29 patients treated with myeloablative doses of iodine-131-anti-CD20 antibody (anti-B1) and autologous stem-cell rescue. PATIENTS AND METHODS Trace-labeled biodistribution studies first determined the ability to deliver higher absorbed radiation doses to tumor sites than to lung, liver, or kidney at varying amounts of anti-B1 protein (0.35, 1.7, or 7 mg/kg). Twenty-nine patients received therapeutic infusions of single-agent (131)I-anti-B1, given at the protein dose found optimal in the biodistribution study, labeled with amounts of (131)I (280 to 785 mCi [10.4 to 29.0 GBq]) calculated to deliver specific absorbed radiation doses to the normal organs, followed by autologous stem-cell support. RESULTS Major responses occurred in 25 patients (86%), with 23 complete responses (CRs; 79%). The nonhematopoietic dose-limiting toxicity was reversible cardiopulmonary insufficiency, which occurred in two patients at RIT doses that delivered > or = 27 Gy to the lungs. With a median follow-up time of 42 months, the estimated overall and progression-free survival rates are 68% and 42%, respectively. Currently, 14 of 29 patients remain in unmaintained remissions that range from 27+ to 87+ months after RIT. Late toxicities have been uncommon except for elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels found in approximately 60% of the subjects. Two patients developed second malignancies, but none have developed myelodysplasia (MDS). CONCLUSION Myeloablative (131)I-anti-B1 RIT is relatively well tolerated when given with autologous stem-cell support and often results in prolonged remission durations with few late toxicities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document