Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy in multiple myeloma

2008 ◽  
Vol 141 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant Kapoor ◽  
Patricia T. Greipp ◽  
William G. Morice ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Thomas E. Witzig ◽  
...  
Hematology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Habermann

AbstractThe aggressive lymphomas are potentially curable. The natural history of certain aggressive lymphomas has been altered by monoclonal antibody therapy. Targeted monoclonal antibody therapy to the CD20 antigen has altered the outcome of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients of all ages. Anti-CD20–based radioimmunoconjugates are being evaluated as radioimmunotherapy approaches in patients who have relapsed and in stem cell transplant settings. Antibody-directed therapy to the B-cell–specific antigen CD22 are ongoing. New approaches include different CD20 antibodies and an antibody to the CD40 antigen, which is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family, which is expressed on B-cells. Antibody therapy has been incorporated into CHOP (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone) therapy and other regimens such as EPOCH (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) and HyperCVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone). Single-agent anti-CD20 therapy is active in the post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders. T-cell antibodies are under evaluation in a number of T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Targeted therapy has changed the natural history of a number of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas. This review will describe the contributions of antibody therapies to the treatment of these diseases.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 954-961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura M. Rogers ◽  
Sarah L. Mott ◽  
Brian J. Smith ◽  
Brian K. Link ◽  
Deniz Sahin ◽  
...  

Leukemia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 2266-2275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ujjawal H. Gandhi ◽  
Robert F. Cornell ◽  
Arjun Lakshman ◽  
Zhubin J. Gahvari ◽  
Elizabeth McGehee ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 261-261
Author(s):  
Lauren Schluenz ◽  
Kate Jeffers ◽  
Joseph Kalis

261 Background: The US Food and Drug Administration has issued a boxed warning for anti-CD20 monoclonal anti-bodies for the reactivation of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines recommend routine serologic testing for all patients receiving anti-CD20 antibody therapy. NCCN specifies serologic screening of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) should be completed prior to initiation of anti-CD20 therapy. In March 2018, UCHealth included HBV screening into the EHR oncology templates which include an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of this template modification on compliance to guideline recommended screening for patients receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of patients who received an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody for an oncologic indication between April 1, 2017 to November 30, 2017 (pre-template change) and April 1, 2018 to November 30, 2018 (post-template change) at any of the UCHealth Cancer Care and Hematology Centers. The primary objective was the composite compliance rate of HBsAg and HBcAb screening completed prior to receipt of treatment. Secondary objectives included compliance rate of each screening test, days between screening and treatment, screening for initial compared to relapse therapy, and rate of hepatitis C virus screening. Results: The addition HBV serologic screening to the EHR oncology templates containing an anti-CD20 agent improved screening compliance of HBsAg and HBcAb by 6.7% as a system (2017: 89.7% vs 2018: 96.4% [p = 0.133]). Secondary endpoints saw an increase in testing of each individual screening, testing for patients in the relapse setting, and HCV screening. Additionally, a reduction was seen in median days between screening and start of therapy (2017: 11 (4.5-30.3 IQR) vs 2018: 7 (2-14 IQR) [p = 0.008]). Conclusions: The addition of HBV serologic screening to EHR oncology templates increased compliance to guideline recommended screening for patients receiving anti-CD20 antibody therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document