PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS AND PRESCRIBING PATTERNS AT THE PAEDIATRIC ASTHMA CLINIC OF A TEACHING HOSPITAL SERVING A DEVELOPING COMMUNITY

1986 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-306
Author(s):  
S. Rawnsley ◽  
R. S. Summers ◽  
I. T. Hay
2003 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A Boothby ◽  
Lih-Jen Wang ◽  
Susan Mayhew ◽  
Lynn Chestnutt

Meperidine (Demerol) is an opiate analgesic that is not considered first-line therapy for most pain management indications because of concerns about its safety and efficacy. Inpatient data from a 417-bed community teaching hospital revealed high use of meperidine in oral, IM, and IV forms. A multifaceted academic detailing approach was employed to change prescribing behavior and decrease meperidine use. This approach included conducting two concurrent Medication Use Evaluations; Grand Rounds presentations for pharmacy staff, nurses, and medical residents; solicitation of opinion leaders; pocket and table-top cards; newsletter articles; and provision of pharmaceutical care. Comparing the number of meperidine doses dispensed per adjusted patient day before and after the intervention, use was reduced by 0.0966 doses per patient (P < 0.05: 95% CI, 0.0955 to 0.0977). The number of patients receiving meperidine was reduced by 2.43% (P < 0.05: 95% CI, 1.97 to 2.88). This translates into a relative reduction of 29.5% in patients receiving meperidine and a relative reduction of 31% in meperidine doses dispensed per patient after academic detailing initiatives vs before. Eighty-five percent of standard orders were changed to improve therapy; these changes included converting meperidine to morphine or hydromorphone, decreasing cumulative acetaminophen daily dosages, using controlled-release and immediate-release opioids for pain management when oral therapy was tolerated, and combining modalities with different mechanisms of action for synergy and to decrease potential adverse effects from larger dosages of single entities. Academic detailing of meperidine resulted in short-term changes in prescribing patterns and decreased meperidine use at this institution. Long-term implications for pain management have not yet been assessed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. e38
Author(s):  
Alexander Blake Smith ◽  
Drew Johnson ◽  
Kumar Sarkar ◽  
Alissa Connelly ◽  
Dean Karalis

Pharmacy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 235
Author(s):  
Faizah Safina Bakrin ◽  
Mohd Makmor-Bakry ◽  
Wan Hazmy Che Hon ◽  
Shafeeq Mohd Faizal ◽  
Mohamed Mansor Manan ◽  
...  

Introduction: Drug utilization of analgesics in a private healthcare setting is useful to examine their prescribing patterns, especially the newer injectable cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors (coxibs). Objectives: To evaluate the utilization of coxibs and traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (tNSAIDs) indicated for postoperative orthopaedic pain control using defined daily dose (DDD) and ratio of use density to use rate (UD/UR). Method: A retrospective drug utilization review (DUR) of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at an inpatient department of a private teaching hospital in Seremban, Malaysia was conducted. Patients’ demographic characteristics, medications prescribed, clinical lab results, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores and length of hospital stay were documented. Orthopaedic surgeries, namely arthroscopy, reconstructive, and fracture fixation, were included. Stratified random sampling was used to select patients. Data were collected through patients’ medical records. The DDD per 100 admissions and the indicator UD/UR were calculated with the World Health Organization’s DDD as a benchmark. The inclusion criteria were patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery prescribed with coxibs (celecoxib capsules, etoricoxib tablets, parecoxib injections) and tNSAIDs (dexketoprofen injections, diclofenac sodium tablets). Data were analysed descriptively. This research was approved by the academic institution and the hospital research ethics committee. Result: A total of 195 records of patients who received NSAIDs were randomly selected among 1169 cases. In term of the types of orthopaedic surgery, the ratio of included records for arthroscopy:fracture fixation:reconstructive surgery was 55.4:35.9:8.7. Most of the inpatients had low rates of common comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease as supported by their baseline parameters. The majority were not prescribed with other concomitant prescriptions that could cause drug interaction (74.9%), or gastroprotective agents (77.4%). Overall, DDDs per 100 admissions for all NSAIDs were less than 100, except for parecoxib injections (389.23). The UD/UR for all NSAIDs were less than 100, except for etoricoxib tablets (105.75) and parecoxib injections (108.00). Discussion: As per guidelines, the majority (96.9%) received other analgesics to ensure a multimodal approach was carried out to control pain. From the UD/UR results, the arthroscopy surgery was probably the most appropriate in terms of NSAID utilization. Conclusion: The prescribing pattern of NSAIDs except parecoxib was appropriate based on adverse effect and concurrent medication profile. The findings of this DUR provide insight for a low-risk patient population at a private specialized teaching hospital on the recommended use of NSAIDs for postoperative orthopaedic pain control.


Author(s):  
Sudharam T. Bhagwate ◽  
Renuka S. Harwani ◽  
Dheeraj S. Jeswani ◽  
Sagar N. Yalgundee ◽  
Rupesh A. Warbhe

Background: To analyze the prescribing patterns of statins a hypolipidemic agents by using HMIS database in outdoor patients at tertiary care teaching hospital of central India.Methods: In this retrospective study Using HMIS database, 1000 prescriptions were analyzed for statin use for various WHO prescription indicators using ATC code of statins, the ratio of prescribed daily dose (PDD) and defined daily dose (DDD) was calculated.Results: Atorvastatin was the only statin which was prescribed as monotherapy (61.1%), whereas as combination with aspirin (38.9%). While analyzing the prescriptions, it was found that patients having abnormal lipid profiles (51.8%) and normal lipid profiles (48.2%) were prescribed atorvastatin. Hypertension with diabetes (37%) was the most common disease followed by hypertension (21.2%) and diabetes mellitus (21%) for which atorvastatin was prescribed. The average number of drugs per prescription were 3.8±1.65.Conclusions: This study depicts the use of atorvastatin in various disease conditions, both as primary and secondary preventive measures. There was no polypharmacy. Such studies should be done to educate the physicians on good prescribing practices and to rationalize use of hypolipidemic drugs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document