A novel Internet-based blended learning programme providing core competency in clinical research

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukio Tsugihashi ◽  
Naoki Kakudate ◽  
Yoko Yokoyama ◽  
Yosuke Yamamoto ◽  
Hiroki Mishina ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 100301
Author(s):  
Merrie Gowie ◽  
Danielle Wilson ◽  
Sarah Gregory ◽  
Louise L. Clark

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A54.3-A55
Author(s):  
Amélie Julé ◽  
Tamzin Furtado ◽  
Liam Boggs ◽  
François Van Loggerenberg ◽  
Trudie Lang

Trials ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamzin Furtado ◽  
Amélie Julé ◽  
Liam Boggs ◽  
Francois van Loggerenberg ◽  
Victoria Ewing ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. 50-50
Author(s):  
Alberto M. Carrera ◽  
Lizbelle De Jesús-Ojeda ◽  
Estela Estape ◽  
Lourdes E. Soto de Laurido

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Goal—broaden the academic offer to enhance clinical and translational research productivity and cost effectiveness. Objective—implement a distance learning program on conducting proficient research management. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Needs assessment attested students’ interest in enrolling and willingness to recruit graduates by the research industry and academia. A master of science in clinical research management and regulatory compliance (MS-CRMRC) was developed using the Core Competency Domains for Clinical Research Professional. Experts from research academia, pharmaceutical industry, composed a Proposal Development Committee. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Access of a distance learning MS-CRMRC program for students with time constrains. Competent research professional graduates working side by side with the principal investigator on onsite teamwork management, to streamline research processes in compliance to regulations. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Improvement of clinical and translational research productivity and efficient use of grants funds prevails as a generalized concern. The MS-CRMRC offers an accessible alternative to empower the research enterprise by developing knowledgeable skilled professionals to tackle this need.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0256814
Author(s):  
Athira Balakrishnan ◽  
Sreedharan Nair ◽  
Vijayanarayana Kunhikatta ◽  
Muhammed Rashid ◽  
M. K. Unnikrishnan ◽  
...  

Background &objectives Though there are studies to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning in pharmacy education, most of them originate from USA and have used previous year students’ scores as control. Also there is less research in comparing use of self -regulated learning strategies between blended and other learning strategies. Primary aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning on knowledge score using clinical research modules. Secondary objective was designed to compare the use of self-regulated learning strategies between blended learning, web-based e-learning and didactic teaching. Materials and methods A prospective cluster randomized trial was conducted with didactic teaching as control and web-based e-learning and blended learning as interventions. The target population was final year Pharm D students. Outcome was assessed using a validated knowledge questionnaire, a motivated strategies for learning questionnaire and a feedback form. All statistical analyses were carried out using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) Version 20. Results A total of 241 students from 12 colleges completed the study. Mean knowledge score of students in blended learning group was higher than those in the didactic teaching and web- based e- learning program (64.26±18.19 Vs 56.65±8.73 Vs 52.11±22.06,p<0.001).Frequency of use of learning strategies namely rehearsal, elaboration, organization and critical thinking was statistically significantly higher in the blended learning group compared to those of didactic and web-based e-learning group (p<0.05) But there were no statistically significant difference of motivational orientations between didactic and blended learning group except strategies of extrinsic goal orientation and self-efficacy. Students preferred blended learning (86.5%) over didactic and web-based e-learning. Conclusion Blended learning approach is an effective way to teach clinical research module. Students of blended learning group employed all motivational and learning strategies more often than students of the didactic and web- based e-learning groups except strategies of intrinsic goal orientation, task value, control of learning belief and help seeking.


1984 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 448-452
Author(s):  
LA Tedesco ◽  
JE Albino ◽  
WM Feagans ◽  
RS Mackenzie

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-11
Author(s):  
Madalena Walsh ◽  
Nan Bernstein Ratner
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document