The Secretion of the Third Component of Complement (C3) by Human Polymorphonuclear Leucocytes from both Normal and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Cases

1993 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. F. FARIED ◽  
T. TACHIBANA ◽  
T. OKUDA
1981 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1255-1260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Sano ◽  
Hiroaki Nishimukai ◽  
Hajime Kitamura ◽  
Kazuyoshi Nagaki ◽  
Shinya Inai ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1304-1313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence D. Petz ◽  
Runas Powers ◽  
James R. Fries ◽  
Neil R. Cooper ◽  
Halsted R. Holman

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 827-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Raissi ◽  
Carly Hewson ◽  
Janet E. Pope

Objective.Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) frequently undergo repeat testing for antibodies against extractable nuclear antigens (anti-ENA), but it is not known whether this is necessary or cost-effective. This study characterized the frequencies of changes in anti-ENA, anti–dsDNA, and complement C3 and C4 upon repeat testing.Methods.Chart review was done at one site of 130 patients with SLE enrolled in the 1000 Canadian Faces of Lupus prospective registry with annual antibody and complement testing. We determined the frequency of seroconversion (changes) on the next test and over the entire followup given 1 or multiple consistent results, and the cost to detect these changes.Results.Overall, 89.4% of patients had no changes in anti-ENA screening results from the first available test, 3.3% changed from negative to positive, and 7.3% from positive to negative. Following a single anti-ENA test, 3.9% of negative tests changed to positive and 4.2% of positive changed to negative on the next test. After multiple consistent tests, the frequencies of changes progressively declined. No changes from the first test were observed in anti-dsDNA, C3, and C4 in 60.8%, 83.3%, and 75.4% of patients, respectively. After 2 consistent anti-ENA tests, the cost to detect 1 change was above US$2000.Conclusion.Anti-ENA results change infrequently, especially following 1 or more negative tests. The high cost and lack of evidence that changes affect management suggest that repeating anti-ENA tests routinely is unnecessary. Anti-dsDNA and complements change more frequently after an abnormal result, but less after a normal value.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 232-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parisa Afzali ◽  
Anna Isaeian ◽  
Peyman Sadeghi ◽  
Bobak Moazzami ◽  
Nima Parvaneh ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) accounts for about 10%-20% of all patients with SLE. Deficiencies in early complement components of the classical pathway are the strong genetic risk factor for the development of SLE. In this study, clinical and laboratory manifestations of both complement-deficient and normal complement pSLE patients were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To investigate clinical and immunological manifestations of pSLE in Iran, 36 consecutive pSLE patients (onset before 18 years) who were followed up over a period of 2 years, were studied. Complement C1q and C2 levels were measured using radial immunodifusion assay and complement C3 and C4 levels were measured using nephelometry. Medical records were retrospectively evaluated from patient database of Children Medical Center Hospital. Data were assessed through descriptive analysis (confidence interval = 95%), paired t-test, and Pearson correlation test. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (58%) had at least one component of complement deficiency. Ten patients (27%) had low C1q level, 11 patients (30.5%) had low C2, nine patients (25%) had low C3, and four patients (11%) had low C4 level. Serum level of complement in pSLE was significantly lower than the control group, except C4 (P = 0.005). The low C1q patients had an earlier age of onset of disease (P < 0.0001). The cutaneous manifestations were more frequent and much more severe in pSLE with low complement (100% vs. 73%). The frequency of renal and musculoskeletal symptoms was equal, but renal morbidity was more common in pSLE with low complement. Positivity for anti-ds-DNA was less common in pSLE with low complement (71% vs. 86%). CONCLUSION: In pSLE patients with early disease onset and more aggressive SLE manifestations and negative anti-ds-DNA test, complement deficiency should be considered.


2018 ◽  
Vol 77 (12) ◽  
pp. 1810-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas L van den Hoogen ◽  
Joël A G van Roon ◽  
Jorre S Mertens ◽  
Judith Wienke ◽  
Ana Pinheiro Lopes ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe interferon (IFN) signature is related to disease activity and vascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and represents a promising therapeutic target. Quantification of the IFN signature is currently performed by gene expression analysis, limiting its current applicability in clinical practice. Therefore, the objective of this study was to establish an easy to measure biomarker for the IFN signature.MethodsSerum levels of galectin-9, CXCL-10 (IP-10) and tumour necrosis factor receptor type II (TNF-RII) were measured in patients with SLE, SLE+APS and primary APS (PAPS) and healthy controls (n=148) after an initial screening of serum analytes in a smaller cohort (n=43). Analytes were correlated to measures of disease activity and the IFN signature. The performance of galectin-9, CXCL-10 and TNF-RII as biomarkers to detect the IFN signature was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves.ResultsGalectin-9, CXCL-10 and TNF-RII were elevated in patients with SLE, SLE+APS and PAPS (p<0.05) and correlated with disease activity and tissue factor expression. Galectin-9 correlated stronger than CXCL-10 or TNF-RII with the IFN score (r=0.70, p<0.001) and was superior to CXCL-10 or TNF-RII in detecting the IFN signature (area under the curve (AUC) 0.86). Importantly, in patients with SLE(±APS), galectin-9 was also superior to anti-dsDNA antibody (AUC 0.70), or complement C3 (AUC 0.70) and C4 (AUC 0.78) levels in detecting the IFN signature.ConclusionGalectin-9 is a novel, easy to measure hence clinically applicable biomarker to detect the IFN signature in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases such as SLE and APS.


2016 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Garabet ◽  
I.-M. Gilboe ◽  
M.-C. Mowinckel ◽  
A. F. Jacobsen ◽  
T. E. Mollnes ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-102
Author(s):  
Saiful Bahar Khan ◽  
Rafi Nazrul Islam ◽  
Md Saif Bin Mizan ◽  
AKM Shahidur Rahman ◽  
Shah Md Zakir Hossain ◽  
...  

Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most common and serious manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that causes significant morbidity and mortality. Certain biomarkers for LN are sometimes able to assess treatment response in lupus nephritis. This study aimed to compare serum complement levels (C3 and C4) as markers of treatment response of LN and their relation to the LN class in renal biopsy. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Nephrology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from July 2018 to August 2019. Twenty seven patients who were diagnosed with LN after kidney biopsy were included in this study. Serum complement levels (C3 and C4), 24 hours urinary total protein (24-hr UTP) and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-ds DNA) were measured in all patients at baseline, 3 months and 6 months after treatment initiation. These biomarker values before and after treatment were compared between the proliferative and non-proliferative LN patients. Results: Serum C3 levels were significantly different between patients with proliferative LN (Class III and Class IV) and non-proliferative LN (Class V) at baseline (0.47 ± 0.32 g/l versus 0.89 ± 0.43 g/l, p=0.009) and levels changed significantly 6 months after treatment initiation (p<0.001) and likewise for serum C4 levels (0.10 ± 0.06 g/l versus 0.24 ± 0.26 g/l, p=0.040). The values of 24-hr UTP and anti-ds-DNA were significantly different 6 months after treatment with p value <0.05 in both groups but C3 (p<0.001) and renal Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (rSLEDAI) (p<0.001) were only significant in the proliferative group. On the other hand, after 6 months treatment, C4 levels became relatively higher but that was not significant in both groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: After 6 months of treatment, serum C3 and C4 levels increased towards normal in both LN groups. Serum C3 and C4 levels in patients with LN correlate with disease activity. Therefore, serum complement (C3 and C4) levels may be utilized as serological biomarkers for treatment response of LN. Birdem Med J 2021; 11(2): 97-102


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document