A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of aerobic vs. resistance exercise training on visceral fat

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Ismail ◽  
S. E. Keating ◽  
M. K. Baker ◽  
N. A. Johnson
2020 ◽  
Vol 138 ◽  
pp. 111012
Author(s):  
Iván Cuyul-Vásquez ◽  
Lily Berríos-Contreras ◽  
Stephanie Soto-Fuentes ◽  
Karina Hunter-Echeverría ◽  
Gabriel Nasri Marzuca-Nassr

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 463-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andressa Santoro Faber Fidalgo ◽  
Paulo Farinatti ◽  
Juliana Pereira Borges ◽  
Tainah de Paula ◽  
Walace Monteiro

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 573-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry R O’Bryan ◽  
Thomas M Doering ◽  
Robert W Morton ◽  
Vernon G Coffey ◽  
Stuart M Phillips ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo determine the effects of multi-ingredient protein (MIP) supplements on resistance exercise training (RT)-induced gains in muscle mass and strength compared with protein-only (PRO) or placebo supplementation.Data sourcesSystematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus.Eligibility criteriaRandomised controlled trials with interventions including RT ≥6 weeks in duration and a MIP supplement.DesignRandom effects meta-analyses were conducted to determine the effect of supplementation on fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass, one-repetition maximum (1RM) upper body and 1RM lower body muscular strength. Subgroup analyses compared the efficacy of MIP supplementation relative to training status and chronological age.ResultsThe most common MIP supplements included protein with creatine (n=17) or vitamin D (n=10). Data from 35 trials with 1387 participants showed significant (p<0.05) increases in FFM (0.80 kg (95% CI 0.44 to 1.15)), 1RM lower body (4.22 kg (95% CI 0.79 to 7.64)) and 1RM upper body (2.56 kg (95% CI 0.79 to 4.33)) where a supplement was compared with all non-MIP supplemented conditions (means (95% CI)). Subgroup analyses indicated a greater effect of MIP supplements compared with all non-MIP supplements on FFM in untrained (0.95 kg (95% CI 0.51 to 1.39), p<0.0001) and older participants (0.77 kg (95% CI 0.11 to 1.43), p=0.02); taking MIP supplements was also associated with gains in 1RM upper body (1.56 kg (95% CI 0.80 to 2.33), p=0.01) in older adults.Summary/conclusionsWhen MIP supplements were combined with resistance exercise training, there were greater gains in FFM and strength in healthy adults than in counterparts who were supplemented with non-MIP. MIP supplements were not superior when directly compared with PRO supplements. The magnitude of effect of MIP supplements was greater (in absolute values) in untrained and elderly individuals undertaking RT than it was in trained individuals and in younger people.Trial registration numberCRD42017081970.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document