Agreement between histological subtype on punch biopsy and surgical excision in primary basal cell carcinoma

Author(s):  
M.H. Roozeboom ◽  
K. Mosterd ◽  
V.J.L. Winnepenninckx ◽  
P.J. Nelemans ◽  
N.W.J. Kelleners-Smeets
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 2213-2216
Author(s):  
Lerinza Van der Worm ◽  
Riyaadh Roberts ◽  
Thuraya Isaacs ◽  
Reginald M. Ngwanya

2016 ◽  
Vol 175 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.J. Kadouch ◽  
A. van Haersma de With ◽  
J. Limpens ◽  
A.C. van der Wal ◽  
A. Wolkerstorfer ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (7) ◽  
pp. 976-979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay A McGrath ◽  
Adam Meeney ◽  
Zanna I Currie ◽  
Hardeep Singh Mudhar ◽  
Jennifer H Tan

AimsThe aim is to study staged periocular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) excision in a tertiary oculoplastic referral centre in Sheffield, UK. In particular, we examined patients with close or positive margins and no tumour seen on re-excision to identify demographics and tumour characteristics in this population.MethodsA retrospective review of medical records of 437 cases of staged periocular BCC excisions over a 10-year period (2007–2017) was carried out. Patients had surgical excision with 3 mm clinically clear margins. Staged excision was performed for all cases included in this study. Standard reconstruction techniques were employed. Histopathology was analysed for tumour type, subtype and stage.ResultsOver the 10-year period, of the 437 periocular BCCs, 156 had close or involved margins. Residual tumour was found in 29 (18.6%), whereas in 122 eyelids of 120 patients (78.2%) no residual tumour was identified on histological examination. Micronodular (54.1%) and nodular (23.7%) growth patterns of BCC, as well as lower eyelid location (72.1%), were the most prevalent in this population. Two patients (1.6%) had recurrence of BCC over a mean follow-up of 57 months (range 1–125 months).ConclusionsA significant proportion of BCCs transected on initial excision show no residual tumour in the re-excision specimens. In the interval between initial excision and re-excision, there may be eradication of the residual tumour. The exact mechanisms for this are unclear, however, and re-excision remains the appropriate recommended course in the presence of involved surgical margins of periocular BCC, particularly when high-risk tumour subtypes are encountered.


Dermatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 236 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lieke C.J. van Delft ◽  
Patty J. Nelemans ◽  
Myrurgia Abdul Hamid ◽  
Nicole W.J. Kelleners-Smeets

Background: The histological subtype of basal-cell carcinoma (BCC) is often based on a punch biopsy; only a small part is evaluated, possibly leading to misclassification. Consensus on the optimal approach to process punch biopsies is lacking, though accurate subtyping is important for appropriate treatment. Objective: The aim is to investigate whether evaluating 4 levels of a punch biopsy instead of 1 or 2 levels leads to more accurate subtyping of BCC. Methods: In a retrospective study we evaluated 87 punch biopsies of histologically confirmed BCCs. The primary outcome was the proportion of “more aggressive” BCCs (nonsuperficial vs. superficial, infiltrative vs. nodular subtype) that was missed by evaluation on 1 or 2 levels, using 4-level diagnosis as reference standard. Results: Eighty-five cases were available for analysis. Subtyping based on 1 level resulted in discrepancies with 4-level diagnosis in 16.5% of all cases. Underdiagnosis occurred in 14 of 58 nonsuperficial BCCs (24.1%, 95% CI: 13.9–37.2). Seven of 38 nodular BCCs (18.4%, 95% CI: 7.74–34.3) were diagnosed as superficial in 1 level, and 7 of 20 infiltrative BCCs (35%, 95% CI: 15.4–59.2) were diagnosed as superficial (n = 2) or nodular (n = 5) in 1 level. Conclusion: In order to maximize correct subtyping and plan appropriate treatment, we advise to evaluate at least 2, but preferably more, levels of a punch biopsy to determine the BCC subtype.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document