IS PUBLICLY FUNDED AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH EXCESSIVE?-A REPLY

1988 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 456-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Thirtle
2008 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 577-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. G. Silversides ◽  
Y. Song ◽  
R. Renema ◽  
B. R. Rathgeber ◽  
H. L. Classen

Twenty-three genetically distinct lines of chickens are maintained as living populations by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and Canada’s eight Faculties of Agriculture. Historically, cryogenic storage of avian genetic material has been difficult, but we have developed techniques of gonadal transplantation to allow recuperation of stored genetic material into living birds. Gonads from 1660 day-old chicks or late-term embryos (810 females and 850 males) from 18 chicken populations from four Canadian institutions were harvested and cryopreserved using dimethylsulfoxide as a cryoprotectant. Future efforts will be directed to completing the collection of the populations kept in Canadian publicly-funded institutions that conduct agricultural research. Key words: Chicken, genetic resources, cryopreservation, gonads


2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis M. Epplin

One hundred and fifty years ago, the 1862 Morrill Land Grant Act was signed into law. Wise people at that time recognized that the private market for education failed to produce an efficient level of education decades before the economic theory was developed to explain that market failures reduce efficiency. The purpose of this paper is to review the history of selected events that resulted in the development of publicly funded U.S. educational institutions and to issue a challenge for our profession to do a better job of educating about the theoretical justification for using tax dollars to support university education and agricultural research and the efficiency enhancing consequences of that use.


1988 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Beck ◽  
M. Upton ◽  
W. S. Wise

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie T. Sharp ◽  
C. Clare Hinrichs

AbstractEnvironmental and social concerns about the use of capital-intensive agricultural technologies have fueled questions about the process, impact, and future direction of the system that is largely responsible for developing these technologies; that is, publicly funded agricultural research at U.S. land-grant universities. Although social scientists have analyzed the public agricultural research system and farmers' attitudes towards various capital-intensive agricultural technologies, there has been less research on farmers' attitudes toward publicly funded research that focuses specifically on lowerinput agricultural technologies that contribute to sustainability goals. This research examines farmers' attitudes toward publicly funded research on one such low-input technology, deep-bedded hoop structures for swine production. With lower capital costs and purported environmental and management advantages, hoop structures have been promoted to and adopted by growing numbers of Midwest swine producers. The study hypotheses draw on published theories of the treadmill of technology, and of innovation adoption and diffusion. Using a 1997 mail survey of Iowa swine producers (n = 298), we examined factors associated with producers' attitudes toward publicly funded research on hoop structures and found that 40% were supportive of the research, 40% were opposed, and 20% were undecided. Of the variables examined, the producer's assessment of hoop structures' contribution to sustainability, number of external knowledge sources about hoop structures, and formal education were each significantly related to support for publicly funded hoop-structure research. Two farm structure variables, marketings and percentage of income from farming, were not significantly related in this study. Future research on farmers' attitudes toward public sector agricultural research should take account of farmers' views of potential impacts of the specific technologies being researched and developed, and the nature of farmers' ties to the land-grant university system. This study clarifies the importance of farmers' perceptions and concerns about specific agricultural technologies in directing public agricultural research planning and policy toward broader sustainability goals.


Food Policy ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 102196
Author(s):  
Philip Thornton ◽  
Jeroen Dijkman ◽  
Mario Herrero ◽  
Lili Szilagyi ◽  
Laura Cramer

1999 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-292
Author(s):  
Mumtaz Ahmad ◽  
Joseph G. Nagy

Private sector investment in agricultural research in Pakistan, although growing in importance, is limited at present and with a few exceptions, has not had a significant impact on agricultural production and productivity. The publicly funded agricultural research system has made the major contribution to increases in production and productivity growth. However the impressive gains of the past cannot be achieved with the current underfunded public research system which makes it all the more important for private sector investment in agricultural research to achieve its full potential in areas of its comparative advantage. This paper identifies the magnitude of private sector agricultural research investment in Pakistan and discusses some of the current policy constraints that hamper its scope. Information was gathered through informal and formal surveys of multinational and national firms conducting agricultural research in Pakistan in the areas of inputs and product processing. Although private sector investment in agricultural research has more than doubled in the past ten years, uncertainty persists surrounding privatisation issues, unresolved intellectual property rights regulation, and the enforcement of seed certification and truth-in-labelling rules and regulations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document