Lymphocytic Response to Basal-Cell Carcinoma: In Situ Identification of Functional Subsets Using Monoclonal Antibodies

1982 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 943-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Alt ◽  
N. FRED EAGLSTEIN ◽  
ALFRED D. HERNANDEZ ◽  
JOSEPH E. ALLEN
2021 ◽  
pp. 106689692110173
Author(s):  
Vilde Pedersen ◽  
Katrine S. Petersen ◽  
Klaus Brasso ◽  
Olga Østrup ◽  
Anand C. Loya

Basal cell carcinomas of prostate (BCCP) are very rare. Most arise in the transition zone and thus are associated with lower urinary tract symptoms and rarely associated with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA). These features make diagnosis/early diagnosis difficult because of the routine protocols followed. Basal cell carcinomas have distinctive histopathological, immunohistochemical, and to some extent also different molecular characteristics. Basal cell carcinoma in situ (BCCIS) is a nonexistent histological lesion as per the current literature, but here is an attempt to describe it through this case. A 74-year-old man presented with hematuria and previous diagnosis of prostatic hyperplasia. Based on this history, he underwent a prostatectomy ad modum Freyer. Pathological examination surprisingly revealed a diffusely infiltrative tumor with nonacinar adenocarcinoma morphology and many glandular structures probably representing BCCIS. Tumor was diagnosed as BCCP. Patient presented with metastasis to the abdominal wall 8 months postprostatectomy. BCCP is an aggressive type of prostate cancer, which might be challenging to diagnose based on routine protocols. This results in delayed diagnosis and treatment and thus poor prognosis. Furthermore, patients with this subtype of prostate cancer need appropriately designed, and maybe a totally different follow-up regimen as PSA is of no use for BCCP patients. Finally, diagnosis of BCCIS, if agreed upon its existence needs to be studied in larger cohorts as a precursor lesion.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise J. Smith ◽  
Ehab A. Husain

Although malignant melanoma (MM) and both basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and actinic keratosis (AK) are sun-induced lesions, the coexistence of these entities at the same anatomical site (collision tumour) is exceedingly rare. We report the case of a 54-year-old woman with a known history of xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XPV) who presented with 2 separate skin lesions over the middle and upper right forearm, respectively. The clinical impression was that of BCCs or squamous cell lesions. On histological examination, both specimens showed features of melanoma <em>in situ </em>(MIS). In the first lesion, MIS merged with and colonised a superficial and focally invasive BCC. In the second lesion, MIS merged with an AK. No separate invasive nests of malignant melanoma were seen in either specimen. The atypical melanocytes were highlighted by Melan-A and HMB-45 immunostaining, whereas the epithelial cells in both the BCC and AK stained with the pancytokeratin MNF-116. The patient had a previous history of multiple MMs and non-melanomatous skin cancers and finally developed widespread metastatic malignant melanoma, which proved fatal. The rare and interesting phenomenon of collision tumours may pose diagnostic difficulties. To our knowledge, this is the first reported simultaneous presentation of cytologically malignant collision tumours in a patient with XPV.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1120-1120
Author(s):  
Genevieve Gallagher ◽  
Donna E. Hogge ◽  
Thomas J. Nevill ◽  
Stephen H. Nantel ◽  
Michael J. Barnett ◽  
...  

Abstract The development of second solid cancers in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (SCT) represents a serious complication among long term survivors. To assess the incidence and associated risk factors for second solid cancers following allogeneic SCT we performed a retrospective analysis of 926 consecutive patients (pts) who underwent an allogeneic (n=918) or syngeneic (n=8) SCT between January 1985 and December 2003. Primary diagnoses were AML (235), ALL (103), CML (216), lymphoproliferative disorders (150), MDS (96), MM (80) or other (46). Median age at SCT was 39 years (range 12–65) and median time from diagnosis to SCT was 5.1 months (range 0.2–345). 640 pts had a sibling donor (602 matched/38 mismatched) and 286 had an unrelated donor (225 matched/61 mismatched). Stem cell source was bone marrow (810), peripheral blood (109) or both (7). Conditioning regimens were: TBI-based (488), BuCy +/− other (414), other (24). The graft was unmanipulated in 883 pts and T-cell depleted in 43 pts. GvHD prophylaxis consisted of CSA and MTX in 84%. With a median follow-up of 22.2 months post SCT (range 0.07–230.5) for all 926 pts and 84.2 months (range 8.4–230.5) for surviving pts, 30 solid malignancies have occurred in 28 pts at a median of 81.4 months post SCT (range 1.4–207.5). These second tumors involved skin (8 basal cell carcinoma, 4 invasive squamous cell carcinoma), lung (5), oral cavity (4), colon (2), bladder (2) breast (1), kidney (1), parotid gland (1), vulva-in situ (1) and primary unknown (1). 6 of the 28 pts died from the second cancer at a median of 6.1 months (range 0.9–36) following the diagnosis. The cumulative incidence of all second solid cancers at 10 and 15 years was 3.1% (95% CI 2–5%) and 5.7% (95% CI 3–9%), respectively. Excluding basal cell carcinoma and carcinoma in situ, the 10 and 15-year cumulative incidence rates were 2.3% (95% CI 1–4%) and 4.0% (95% CI 2–6%), respectively. Compared to age and gender adjusted cancer rates in the general population of BC, the relative risk (RR) of developing a second solid cancer after allografting excluding basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin was 1.85 (95% CI 1.04–3.06), p =0.019. Risk factors evaluated included initial diagnosis, gender, age at SCT, donor gender, donor age, interval from diagnosis to SCT, year of SCT, source of stem cells, HLA disparity, conditioning regimen, T cell depletion, prior history of radiation therapy, incidence of aGvHD, incidence of cGvHD and aGvHD therapy. In multivariate analysis, significant risk factors were recipient age at SCT &gt;40 years (RR 4.8), p=0.01 and donor gender [female donor/male recipient (RR 5.4), female donor/female recipient (RR 2.3)] p=0.002. We conclude that allogeneic SCT recipients are at an increased risk of developing a second solid cancer as compared to the general population, particularly if the recipient is &gt;40 years at the time of allografting. It is also apparent that male recipients of a female graft have a high risk of second solid cancers. Since we did not find an association between second cancers and aGvHD or cGvHD in our analysis, is it interesting to speculate whether this is somehow related to subclinical GvHD. Regardless, longer follow-up is needed to more fully assess the incidence and risk factors for second solid tumors post-transplant due to their long latency period.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document