WHAT DOES AN EVIDENCE-BASED FALL-PREVENTION PROGRAM MEAN? DEFINING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

2008 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 373-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy A. Stevens
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srijesa Khasnabish ◽  
Zoe Burns ◽  
Madeline Couch ◽  
Mary Mullin ◽  
Randall Newmark ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Data visualization experts have identified core principles to follow when creating visual displays of data that facilitate comprehension. Such principles can be applied to creating effective reports for clinicians that display compliance with quality improvement protocols. A basic tenet of implementation science is continuous monitoring and feedback. Applying best practices for data visualization to reports for clinicians can catalyze implementation and sustainment of new protocols. OBJECTIVE To apply best practices for data visualization to create reports that clinicians find clear and useful. METHODS First, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify best practices for data visualization. We applied these findings and feedback collected via a questionnaire to improve the Fall TIPS Monthly Report (FTMR), which shows compliance with an evidence-based fall prevention program, Fall TIPS (Tailoring Interventions for Patient Safety). This questionnaire was based on the requirements for effective data display suggested by expert Stephen Few. We then evaluated usability of the FTMR using a 15-item Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES). Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). RESULTS The results of the systematic literature review emphasized that the ideal data display maximizes the information communicated while minimizing the cognitive efforts involved with data interpretation. Factors to consider include selecting the correct type of display (e.g. line vs bar graph) and creating simplistic reports. The qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the original and final FTMR revealed improved perceptions of the visual display of the reports and their usability. Themes that emerged from the staff interviews emphasized the value of simplified reports, meaningful data, and usefulness to clinicians. The mean (SD) rating on the Health-ITUES scale when evaluating the original FTMR was 3.86 (0.19) and increased to 4.29 (0.11) when evaluating the revised FTMR (Mann Whitney U Test, z=-12.25, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Best practices identified through a systematic review can be applied to create effective reports for clinician use. The lessons learned from evaluating FTMR perceptions and measuring usability can be applied to creating effective reports for clinician use in the context of other implementation science projects.


2013 ◽  
Vol 61 (12) ◽  
pp. 2142-2149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuzhong Li ◽  
Peter Harmer ◽  
Ronald Stock ◽  
Kathleen Fitzgerald ◽  
Judy Stevens ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srijesa Khasnabish ◽  
Zoe Burns ◽  
Madeline Couch ◽  
Mary Mullin ◽  
Randall Newmark ◽  
...  

Abstract This case report applied principles from the data visualization (DV) literature and feedback from nurses to develop an effective report to display adherence with an evidence-based fall prevention program. We tested the usability of the original and revised reports using a Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) customized for this project. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). The literature emphasized that the ideal display maximizes the information communicated, minimizes the cognitive efforts involved with interpretation, and selects the correct type of display (eg, bar versus line graph). Semi-structured nurse interviews emphasized the value of simplified reports and meaningful data. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) Health-ITUES score for the original report was 3.86 (0.19) and increased to 4.29 (0.11) in the revised report (Mann Whitney U Test, z = −12.25, P &lt; 0.001). Lessons learned from this study can inform report development for clinicians in implementation science.


2020 ◽  
Vol 185 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 28-34
Author(s):  
Arrah L Bargmann ◽  
Stacey M Brundrett

Abstract INTRODUCTION Falls during hospitalizations can increase the length and cost of a hospital stay. Review of patient safety reports on a 26-bed medical-surgical telemetry unit revealed that the number of falls went from 6 in 2015 to 12 in 2016. The reports identified a knowledge gap in the patient population and nursing staff related to high fall risk interventions. A literature review suggests that patient-staff safety agreements, in combination with proper implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines, can successfully increase education and adherence to fall prevention measures and reduce the number of inpatient falls. MATERIALS AND METHODS The objective of this evidence-based practice project was to determine if the implementation of a patient fall safety agreement in combination with an existing evidence-based fall prevention bundle reduces the number of falls. Based on the literature review, the unit developed a multicomponent fall prevention program that emphasizes staff and patient education. The program consists of (1) assessment of the patient’s fall risk using the Johns Hopkins Fall Assessment Tool, (2) daily patient education on factors contributing to the patient’s fall risk during the shift assessment, (3) an educational handout on fall risk factors maintained at the bedside, (4) ensuring compliance with implementation of previously existing fall prevention measures, and (5) a patient fall safety agreement. RESULTS During the first 4 months, the fall rate decreased by 55% and staff compliance with interventions for high fall risk patients increased to 89%. To achieve added compliance, the unit implemented an incentive program, which resulted in the increased adherence to the fall risk interventions. The unit experienced 87 and 88 consecutive fall-free days, which was the longest consecutive days since May 2015. This project has reached sustainment and the unit continues to see a low fall rate, well below the national average for medical-surgical units. CONCLUSION One of the largest obstacles to this project was staff and leadership turnover. However, the project found that patient fall safety agreements facilitate a dialogue among staff and patients as well as encourage patients to take ownership of their own care. They improve the safety of patients and create a collaborative environment for nurses to conduct safe, quality patient care.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilde Worum ◽  
Daniela Lillekroken ◽  
Birgitte Ahlsen ◽  
Kirsti Skavberg Roaldsen ◽  
Astrid Bergland

Abstract Background Falls and fall-related injuries exacerbate the health problems of older adults, and they are a public health concern. Despite an abundance of research, the implementation of evidence-based fall prevention programs has been slow and limited, additionally and these programs have not reduced the incidence of falling. Therefore, the primary objective of the present study was to examine patients and physiotherapists’ views on the factors that influence the implementation of the community- and evidence-based Otago Exercise Programme for fall prevention. Methods We conducted eight in-depth interviews with physiotherapists and patients, and a focus group interview with 12 physiotherapists and authority figures who represented local hospitals and municipalities. The resultant qualitative data were subjected to thematic analysis. Results The analysis yielded two main themes: the researcher’s role and position in the implementation process and the tension between research-based knowledge and clinical practice. The participants believed that research-based knowledge can address the challenges of clinical practice. Further, the patients reported that the fall prevention program made them feel safe and enhanced their ability to cope with daily life. The physiotherapists also observed that research findings do not readily translate into clinical practice. Further, they contended that research-based knowledge is not universal and that it cannot be generalized across different contexts; instead, it must be adapted and translated into a user-friendly language. The findings suggest that the application of research-based knowledge does equate to filling up empty jars and that research-based knowledge does not flow from the expert to the non-expert as water through a tube. Indeed, physiotherapists and patients are not tabula rasa. Additionally, the participants believed that researchers and stakeholders must think critically about who has the power and voice to create a common understanding. Conclusions Our findings delineate the means by which the gap between research and practice regarding the Otago fall prevention program can bridged. The program can guide clinical work and provide important information that can be used to improve the quality of other fall prevention programs. However, the research-based knowledge that it confers must be adapted for use in clinical contexts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document