Induced Atrial Tachycardia After Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Electrophysiological Characteristics and Impact of Catheter Ablation on the Follow-Up Results

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHIH-LIN CHANG ◽  
YENN-JIANG LIN ◽  
CHING-TAI TAI ◽  
LI-WEI LO ◽  
TA-CHUAN TUAN ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 643-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jindong Chen ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Mengmeng Zhou ◽  
Liang Zhao

AbstractBackground:To assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation for lone atrial fibrillation in young adults.Methods:This single-centre, retrospective, observational study enrolled 75 consecutive patients (86.7% men) under 35 (median, 30) years old with lone atrial fibrillation (68% paroxysmal, 26.7% persistent, and 5.3% long-standing persistent) without other cardiopulmonary diseases who underwent catheter ablation between April 2009 and May 2017. Procedural endpoints were circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation with pulmonary vein trigger, and target ablation or bidirectional block of lines and disappearance of complex fractionated atrial electrograms for atrial fibrillation with clear and unclear non-pulmonary vein triggers, respectively.Results:Main study outcome was rate of survival free from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, which at median 61 (range, 5–102) months follow-up was 62.7% (64.7 and 58.3% for paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, respectively) after single ablation, and 69.3% (68.6 and 70.8% for paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, respectively) after mean 1.2 ablations (two and three ablations in 11 and 2 patients, respectively). In multivariate analysis, non-pulmonary vein trigger was a significant independent predictor of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (OR, 10.60 [95%CI, 2.25–49.96]; p = 0.003). There were no major periprocedural adverse events.Conclusions:In patients under 35 years old with lone atrial fibrillation, radiofrequency catheter ablation appeared effective particularly for atrial fibrillation with pulmonary vein trigger and regardless of left atrial size or atrial fibrillation duration or type. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after multiple ablations warrants further study.


2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-319
Author(s):  
Alonso Pedrote ◽  
Eduardo Arana-Rueda ◽  
Lorena García-Riesco ◽  
Adriano Jiménez-Velasco ◽  
Juan Sánchez-Brotons ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Blendea ◽  
S Istratoaie ◽  
S Pop ◽  
M Mansour

Abstract Introduction The effect of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) on left atrial (LA) function has not been well defined. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate impact of ablation on parameters of global and regional LA function using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) Methods We studied 26 consecutive patients (age 56±10 years, 19 men) with paroxysmal AF using ICE before and immediately after circumferential PVI. All pulmonary veins were isolated in all patients. ICE measurements included LA fractional area shortening, peak A wave on transmitral Doppler flow, peak emptying velocity on the left atrial appendage (LAA) Doppler flow, as well as tissue Doppler myocardial velocities at the level of the posterior LA wall, interatrial septum, and lateral wall, which were used as parameters of regional LA function. Results The mean radiofrequency ablation time was 37±22min. Post ablation there was a significant reduction of the LA fractional area shortening from 27±8% to 22±6% (p<0.01). The tissue Doppler velocity of atrial contraction at the posterior wall decreased significantly post ablation: from 8.9±1.8 cm/s to 6.9±1.4 cm/s (p<0.01). There were no significant differences between the pre and post ablation values for tissue Doppler velocities at the level of the interatrial septum or LA lateral wall. The post ablation peak transmitral A wave and peak LAA Doppler velocities did not differ significantly from the pre ablation values. Conclusion In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, circumferential PVI results in an immediate decrease in LA function without a significant change in LAA function.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Tilz ◽  
C L Lenz ◽  
P S Sommer ◽  
N Sawan ◽  
R Meyer-Saraei ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Based on the assumption of trigger elimination, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) currently presents the gold standard of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Recently, rapidly spinning rotors or focal impulse formation has been raised as a crucial sustaining mechanism of AF. Ablation of these rotors may potentially obviate the need for trigger elimination with PVI. Purpose This study sought to compare the safety and effectiveness of Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM) guided catheter ablation only with the gold standard of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal AF. Methods This was a post-market, prospective, single-blinded, randomized, multi-center trial. Patients were enrolled at three centers and equally (1:1) randomized between those undergoing conventional RF ablation with PVI (PVI group) vs. those treated with FIRM-guided RF ablation without PVI (FIRM group). Data was collected at enrollment, procedure, and at 7-day, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up visits. The study was closed early by the sponsor. At the time of study closure, any pending follow-up visits were waived. Results From February 2016 until February 2018, a total of 51 (out of a planned 170) patients (mean age 63±10.6 years, 57% male) were enrolled and randomized. Four patients withdrew from the study prior to treatment, resulting in 23 patients allocated to the FIRM group and 24 in the PVI group. Only 13 patients in the FIRM group and 11 patients in the PVI group completed the 12-month follow-up. Statistical analysis was not completed given the small number of patients. Single-procedure effectiveness (freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence after blanking period) was 52.9% (9/17) in the FIRM group and 85.7% (12/14) in the PVI group at 6 months; and 31.3% (5/16) in the FIRM group and 80% (8/10) in the PVI group at 12 months. Repeat procedures were performed in 45.8% (11/24) patients in the FIRM group and 7.4% (2/27) in the PVI group. The acute safety endpoint [freedom from procedure-related serious adverse events (SAE)] was achieved in 87% (20/23) of FIRM group patients and 100% (24/24) of PVI group patients. Procedure related SAEs occurred in three patients in the FIRM group: 1 femoral artery aneurysm and 2 injection site hematomas. No additional procedure-related SAEs were reported >7 days post-procedure. Conclusions These partial study effectiveness results reinforce the importance of PVI in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients and suggest that FIRM-guided ablation alone (without PVI) is not an effective strategy for treatment of paroxysmal AF in most patients. Further study is needed to understand the effectiveness of adding FIRM-guided ablation as an adjunct to PVI in this patient group. Acknowledgement/Funding Abbot


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document