Age and the Better-Than-Average Effect

2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1175-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
ETHAN ZELL ◽  
MARK D. ALICKE
Keyword(s):  
1995 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 804-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Alicke ◽  
M. L. Klotz ◽  
David L. Breitenbecher ◽  
Tricia J. Yurak ◽  
et al

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael Meager

Despite evidence from multiple randomized evaluations of microcredit, questions about external validity have impeded consensus on the results. I jointly estimate the average effect and the heterogeneity in effects across seven studies using Bayesian hierarchical models. I  find the impact on household business and consumption variables is unlikely to be transformative and may be negligible. I find reasonable external validity: true heterogeneity in effects is moderate, and approximately 60 percent of observed heterogeneity is sampling variation. Households with previous business experience have larger but more heterogeneous effects. Economic features of microcredit interventions predict variation in effects better than studies’ evaluation protocols. (JEL D14, G21, I38, O12, O16, P34, P36)


2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Kuyper ◽  
Pieternel Dijkstra ◽  
Abraham P. Buunk ◽  
Margaretha P.C. van der Werf

2011 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 734-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ron S. Gold ◽  
Mark G. Brown

People tend to regard themselves as having superior personality traits compared to their average peer. To test whether this “better-than-average effect” varies with trait valence, participants ( N = 154 students) rated both themselves and the average student on traits constituting either positive or negative poles of five trait dimensions. In each case, the better-than-average effect was found, but trait valence had no effect. Results were discussed in terms of Kahneman and Tversky's prospect theory.


2010 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 755-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey L. Guenther ◽  
Mark D. Alicke
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina Koppel ◽  
David Andersson ◽  
Gustav Tinghög ◽  
Daniel Västfjäll ◽  
Gilad Feldman

The better-than-average effect refers to the tendency to rate oneself as better than the average person on desirable traits and skills. In a classic study, Svenson (1981) asked participants to rate their driving safety and skill compared to other participants in the experiment. Results showed that the majority of participants rated themselves as far above the median, despite the statistical impossibility of more than 50% of participants being above the median. We report a preregistered, well-powered (total N = 1,203), very close replication and extension of the Svenson (1981) study. Our results indicate that the majority of participants rated their driving skill and safety as above average. We added different response scales as an extension and findings were stable across all three mesaures. Thus, our findings are consistent with the original findings by Svenson (1981). Materials, data, and code are available at https://osf.io/fxpwb/


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document