Effects of low-dose subcutaneous heparin on the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis in patients with ischemic stroke

2009 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 313-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. Gelmers
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Subcutaneous Heparin ◽  
Deep Vein

Low-dose subcutaneous heparin in prevention of deep-vein thrombosis

1972 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 89-91
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Fatal Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Subcutaneous Heparin ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Low Dosage

Earlier this year1 we discussed the prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis and concluded that heparin in low dosage seemed the most promising drug for preventing deep-vein thrombosis postoperatively, although the optimum regimen was not yet known. Sharnoff and his associates who began this work 10 years ago claim to have shown that this treatment largely prevents fatal pulmonary embolism.2

Prevention Of Deep Vein Thrombosis In Medical Patients By Low Dose Subcutaneous Heparin

1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
J J F Belch ◽  
G D O Lowe ◽  
A G Ward ◽  
C D Forbes ◽  
C R M Prentice
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Chest Infection ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Subcutaneous Heparin ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Deep Vein

In recent years it has been repeatedly shown that low-dose subcutaneous heparin reduces the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (D.V.T.) after major general surgery. By comparison, the prevention of thrombosis in medical patients has been little studied. A randomised trial was undertaken in one hundred patients with heart failure and/or chest infection to determine whether low-dose subcutaneous heparin reduced the frequency of D.V.T. in the legs. Heparin (5000 units 8 hourly), started within 12 hours of admission to hospital and continued until the patient was fully mobile, significantly reduced the frequency of D.V.T. diagnosed by the 125I- fibrinogen scan technique, from 26% to 4% (p<0.01). Heparin did not cause bleeding problems except for a 20% incidence of injection site bruising. We therefore recommend prophylaxis with low dose subcutaneous heparin in patients with heart failure or chest infection who require more than 3 days’ bed rest.

Low-dose perioperative heparin: a survey of its use

1974 ◽  
Vol 12 (15) ◽  
pp. 59-60
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Subcutaneous Heparin ◽  
Deep Vein

Two years ago we discussed the value of various measures, including low-dose subcutaneous heparin, in the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis.1 We concluded that heparin used in this way lowers the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis after most major operations and that it is safe, cheap and simple to administer. Subsequent experience summarised in this issue has confirmed these conclusions. How widely is this treatment now used?

Prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Medical Patients by Low-Dose Heparin

1981 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill J. Belch ◽  
G. D. O. Lowe ◽  
Agnes G. Ward ◽  
C. D. Forbes ◽  
C. R. M. Prentice
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Chest Infection ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Subcutaneous Heparin ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Deep Vein

A randomised trial was undertaken in one hundred patients with heart failure and/or chest infection to determine whether low-dose subcutaneous heparin reduced the frequency of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the legs. Heparin, (5000 units 8 hourly) significantly reduced the frequency of DVT, diagnosed by the125I-fibrinogen scan technique, from 26 to 4 per cent (p < 0.01). Heparin was started within 12 hours of admission to hospital and continued until the patient was fully mobile. Heparin did not cause bleeding problems except for a 20 per cent incidence of injection site bruising. We therefore recommend prophylaxis with low-dose subcutaneous heparin in patients with heart failure or chest infection who require more than three days bed rest.

The Hemodynamic and Fibrinolytic Response to Low Dose Epinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Total Hip Replacement Under Epidural Anesthesia

1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (04) ◽  
pp. 436-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel E Sharrock ◽  
George Go ◽  
Robert Mineo ◽  
Peter C Harpel
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Cardiac Index ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Epidural Anesthesia ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryLower rates of deep vein thrombosis have been noted following total hip replacement under epidural anesthesia in patients receiving exogenous epinephrine throughout surgery. To determine whether this is due to enhanced fibrinolysis or to circulatory effects of epinephrine, 30 patients scheduled for primary total hip replacement under epidural anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive intravenous infusions of either low dose epinephrine or phenylephrine intraoperatively. All patients received lumbar epidural anesthesia with induced hypotension and were monitored with radial artery and pulmonary artery catheters.Patients receiving low dose epinephrine infusion had maintenance of heart rate and cardiac index whereas both heart rate and cardiac index declined significantly throughout surgery in patients receiving phenylephrine (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) activity increased significantly during surgery (p <0.0005) and declined below baseline postoperatively (p <0.005) in both groups. Low dose epinephrine was not associated with any additional augmentation of fibrinolytic activity perioperatively. There were no significant differences in changes in D-Dimer, t-PA antigen, α2-plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complexes or thrombin-antithrombin III complexes perioperatively between groups receiving low dose epinephrine or phenylephrine. The reduction in deep vein thrombosis rate with low dose epinephrine is more likely mediated by a circulatory mechanism than by augmentation of fibrinolysis.

Low-Dose Heparin and Deep-Vein Thrombosis after Total Hip Replacement

1976 ◽  
Vol 36 (01) ◽  
pp. 157-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M Mannucci ◽  
Luisa E. Citterio ◽  
N Panajotopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Dose Heparin ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Low Dose Heparin

SummaryThe effect of subcutaneous low-dose heparin on postoperative deep-vein thrombosis (D. V. T.) (diagnosed by the 125I-labelled fibrinogen test) has been investigated in a trial of 143 patients undergoing the operation of total hip replacement. Two randomized studies were carried out: in one the scanning for D.V.T. was carried out daily for 7 days post operatively and in the other for 15 days. In both, the incidence of D.V.T. was significantly lower in the heparin-treated patients (P<0.005). Bilateral D.V.T. was also prevented (P<0.05), through the extension of D.V.T. to the distal veins of the thigh was not significantly reduced. Heparin treatment was, however, followed by a higher incidence of severe postoperative bleeding (P< 0.02) and wound haematoma formation (P< 0.005), and the postoperative haemoglobin was significantly lower than in the control group (P<0.005). A higher number of transfused blood units was also needed by the heparin treated patients (P<0.001).

Intensive Initial Oral Anticoagulation and Shorter Heparin Treatment in Deep Vein Thrombosis

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (03) ◽  
pp. 276-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Schulman ◽  
Dieter Lockner ◽  
Kurt Bergström ◽  
Margareta Blombäck
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Heparin Treatment ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryIn order to investigate whether a more intensive initial oral anticoagulation still would be safe and effective, we performed a prospective randomized study in patients with deep vein thrombosis. They received either the conventional regimen of oral anticoagulation (“low-dose”) and heparin or a more intense oral anticoagulation (“high-dose”) with a shorter period of heparin treatment.In the first part of the study 129 patients were randomized. The “low-dose” group reached a stable therapeutic prothrombin complex (PT)-level after 4.3 and the “high-dose” group after 3.3 days. Heparin was discontinued after 6.0 and 5.0 days respectively. There was no difference in significant hemorrhage between the groups, and no clinical signs of progression of the thrombosis.In the second part of the study another 40 patients were randomized, followed with coagulation factor II, VII, IX and X and with repeated venograms. A stable therapeutic PT-level was achieved after 4.4 (“low-dose”) and 3.7 (“high-dose”) days, and heparin was discontinued after 5.4 and 4.4 days respectively. There were no clinical hemorrhages, the activity of the coagulation factors had dropped to the same level in both groups at the time when heparin was discontinued and no thromboembolic complications occurred.Our oral anticoagulation regimen with heparin treatment for an average of 4.4-5 days seems safe and reduces in-patient costs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document