Intravitreal bevacizumab in the treatment of refractory uveitic macular edema-A one year follow up observational study

2007 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
MJ GALLAGHER ◽  
RA CERVANTES-CASTANEDA ◽  
T YILMAZ ◽  
CS FOSTER
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Uveitic Macular Edema ◽  
One Year

Correlation of response to intravitreal bevacizumab treatment between the first and second treated eyes in diabetic macular edema

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110596
Author(s):  
Nadav Levinger ◽  
Liran Tiosano ◽  
Elishai Assayag ◽  
Rivkah Lender ◽  
Tomer Batash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Thickness Reduction ◽  
Bevacizumab Treatment ◽  
Central Subfield Thickness ◽  
Bilateral Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Selection Of

Purpose To evaluate whether outcome of bevacizumab treatment in the first treated eye can guide the selection of compound for the second treated eye in patients with bilateral diabetic macular edema. Methods Demographic, clinical, and optical coherence tomography data were retrospectively collected from consecutive patients who underwent bevacizumab therapy for bilateral diabetic macular edema. Change in central subfield thickness and visual acuity were evaluated and compared between the first treated eye and second treated eye. Results A total of 66 eyes of 33 patients were included in the study. The mean ± SD follow-up time was 13 ± 5 months. The mean ± SD central subfield thickness at baseline was 464 ± 30 μm in the first treated eye and 461 ± 29 μm in the second treated eye ( p = 0.91). Final central subfield thickness was reduced to 392 ± 27 μm in the first treated eye ( p = 0.01 compared with baseline) and 416 ± 25 μm in the second treated eye ( p = 0.03 compared with baseline). Using ≥5% or ≥10% reduction of central subfield thickness as diagnostic criteria to predict similar magnitude of thickness reduction in the first treated eye yielded a positive and negative predictive value ranging from 46% to 81%, and sensitivity and specificity ranging from 54% to 84%. Regression models did not show correlation between central subfield thickness reduction in first treated eye and the second treated eye at the end of follow-up. Conclusions Bevacizumab therapy reduced macular thickness in both eyes in bilateral diabetic macular edema. Treatment outcome of the first treated eye could not predict the outcome of the second treated eye. Particularly, failure to reduce central subfield thickness in the first treated eye does not preclude a favorable response to bevacizumab therapy in the second eye.

scholarly journals One year follow-up of patients with screen-detected metabolic syndrome in primary care: an observational study

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. den Engelsen ◽  
K. J. Gorter ◽  
P. L. Salome ◽  
G. E. Rutten
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
One Year

Results of One-Year Follow-Up Examinations after Intravitreal Bevacizumab Administration for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

2011 ◽  
Vol 225 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maiko Inoue ◽  
Kazuaki Kadonosono ◽  
Yoichiro Watanabe ◽  
Satoshi Kobayashi ◽  
Shin Yamane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals BEVACIZUMAB FOR RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Radotma Silitonga ◽  
Sindy Boru Sembiring ◽  
Christina Josephina Bangun ◽  
Heri Purwoko
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) caused sudden visual decrease that most often treatable. This paper aims to describe clinical characteristic and outcome using bevacizumab for macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion in real-life practice. Methods: This retrospective study included 91 treatment-naïve eyes with macular edema due to CRVO (55 eyes) and BRVO (36 eyes), who were treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in pro re nata (PRN) regimen. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) before and after treatment were evaluated. Result: The mean age of patients was 60.3 + 11.2 years for CRVO and 55.7 + 8.2 years for BRVO. The mean baseline BCVA in the CRVO group was 1.41 + 0.55 logMAR. There was statistically significant improvement in BCVA after intravitreal bevacizumab compared to baseline (p < 0.001) in CRVO and BRVO group. Twenty six (47.3%) eyes with CRVO had BCVA > 1.0 logMAR (Snellen 20/200) at the last follow-up. In the BRVO group, the mean baseline BCVA was 0.93 + 0.48 logMAR. At the end of the follow up, 19 eyes (52.8%) with BRVO had BCVA > 0.3 logMAR (Snellen 20/40). There was also statistically significant improvement in CMT between all time points and baseline (p < 0.001) in both groups. At the end of the follow up, 26 (47.3%) eyes with CRVO and 25 eyes (69.4%) in BRVO group presented resolution of macular edema (CMT < 300). Conclusion: Intravitreal bevacizumab resulted in significant anatomical and functional improvement in macular edema associated with CRVO and BRVO, although outcome in CRVO group was sub-optimal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document