scholarly journals An observational study of two rehabilitation strategies for patients with chronic pain, focusing on sick leave at one-year follow-up

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1049-1057 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Merrick ◽  
G Sundelin ◽  
B Stålnacke
Author(s):  
Beata Drab ◽  
Katarina Aili ◽  
Emma Haglund ◽  
Stefan Bergman
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. den Engelsen ◽  
K. J. Gorter ◽  
P. L. Salome ◽  
G. E. Rutten

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Begré ◽  
Martin Traber ◽  
Martin Gerber ◽  
Roland von Känel

AbstractPurpose.Venlafaxine has shown benefit in the treatment of depression and pain. Worldwide data are extensively lacking investigating the outcome of chronic pain patients with depressive symptoms treated by venlafaxine in the primary care setting. This observational study aimed to elucidate the efficacy of venlafaxine and its prescription by Swiss primary care physicians and psychiatrists in patients with chronic pain and depressive symptomatology.Subjects and methods.We studied 505 patients with depressive symptoms suffering from chronic pain in a prospective naturalistic Swiss community based observational trial with venlafaxine in primary care. These patients have been treated with venlafaxine by 122 physicians, namely psychiatrists, general practitioners, and internists.Results.On average, patients were treated with 143 ± 75 mg (0–450 mg) venlafaxine daily for a follow-up of three months. Venlafaxine proved to be beneficial in the treatment of both depressive symptoms and chronic pain.Discussion.Although side effects were absent in most patients, physicians might have frequently omitted satisfactory response rate of depression by underdosing venlafaxine. Our results reflect the complexity in the treatment of chronic pain in patients with depressive symptoms in primary care.Conclusion.Further randomized dose-finding studies are needed to learn more about the appropriate dosage in treating depression and comorbid pain with venlafaxine.


2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J Clark ◽  
Ian Beauprie ◽  
Lynne B Clark ◽  
Mary E Lynch

OBJECTIVE: Individuals with chronic pain referred to specialist chronic pain management programs frequently wait months to years for assessment and care. In the authors' pain management program, approximately 600 patients are on the waiting list. An innovative recommendation program to encourage and educate referring physicians to continue active care of pain during this waiting period was developed.METHODS: All referrals to the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre's Pain Management Unit for a one-year period were reviewed and triaged as either 'regular waiting list' or 'fast track'. Patients in the fast track group were seen within four months and required limited interventions or were urgent in nature. The regular waiting list group waited up to 27 months for assessment and development of a treatment plan. Treatment recommendations were faxed to the referring physician. A follow-up questionnaire was sent to each physician to assess whether these treatment recommendations were useful.RESULTS: Recommendations were faxed for 297 patients. One hundred forty-nine physicians returned the follow-up questionnaire. Ninety-five physicians used the recommendations and 68 patients followed the recommendations. Seventy-nine physicians felt that the recommendations were helpful to them in their care of the patient. For 39 patients, the recommendations were helpful. The most frequently used recommendations were those on medications (eg, tricylic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and controlled-release opioids). Other modalities included participation in an interdisciplinary group program and physiotherapy.CONCLUSIONS: A triage review process with recommendations faxed to referring physicians was developed and put into action for one year. The recommendations were used by 32% of the physicians (64% of responding physicians). Fifty-three per cent of responding physicians felt that the recommendations were helpful in the care of their patient. This process led to a benefit in care, as perceived by the physician, in 26% of patients (of physicians who returned the questionnaire [13% of all patients]) on the waiting list for a tertiary care pain management unit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document