Contact allergy to (meth)acrylates in the dental series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens

2006 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 219-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony T. J. Goon ◽  
Marléne Isaksson ◽  
Erik Zimerson ◽  
Chee Leok Goh ◽  
Magnus Bruze
2022 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 17-20
Author(s):  
Trupti Desale ◽  
Abhishek De ◽  
S. K. Shahriar Ahmed ◽  
Aarti Sarda ◽  
Kiran Godse ◽  
...  

Objectives: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is defined as short lived (< 24h) wheals occurring spontaneously without any triggering factors, daily or almost daily for at least 6 weeks. Though CSU is mainly a Type 1 hypersensitivity reaction, earlier studies suggested contact allergy may have some role to play an important role in the etiopathogenesis of CSU. The objective of the study is to find out the relevance of patch test in the etiopathogenesis of and its correlation with serum IgE level. Materials and Methods: Thirty-one patients of CSU were thoroughly evaluated for clinical and laboratory parameters. We conducted patch testing with Indian Standard Series (ISS) in all of them and tried to find out the relevance of every positive reaction. Relevant positive cases were asked to avoid exposure for 2 months and were maintained only in breakthrough antihistamines. Furthermore, correlation of positive patch test reaction with high IgE and eosinophil count were studied. Results: Seventeen (55%) cases came positive for patch test. Potassium dichromate, lanolin, benzocaine, and fragrance mix were the most common offenders. Patients with very high IgE count had patch test positivity with multiple allergens. Seven of the fifteen patients who had relevant positive patch results could be followed up to remission; three were lost to follow-up. Conclusion: Patch test with ISS may give important clue to in a subset of patients of CSU and thus may be considered an important part of routine investigations of CSU.


Medicina ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aistė Beliauskienė ◽  
Skaidra Valiukevičienė ◽  
Brigita Šitkauskienė ◽  
Axel Schnuch ◽  
Wolfgang Uter

Background and Objective. The pattern of contact sensitization among patients with chronic leg ulcers depends on the local practice of wound treatment along with demographic and clinical confounders. The study was aimed at revealing the associations between chronic leg ulcers and contact sensitization. Material and Methods. Between 2006 and 2008, 35 patients with chronic leg ulcers and surrounding dermatitis and 59 patients with contact dermatitis of the lower leg or foot were prospectively recruited at the Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Demographic and clinical data were collected in accordance with the “minimal data set” of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy. Patch testing was performed with the allergens of the European baseline series. Results. At least one positive patch test reaction was found in 28 (80%) of the patients with chronic leg ulcers and in 24 (41%) of the patients with dermatitis of the lower leg or foot (P<0.001). Sensitization to some of the most common allergens, namely colophony, Myroxylon pereirae resin, and methyldibromo glutaronitrile, was prevalent in both the groups of patients, whereas sensitization to benzocaine, p-phenylenediamine, and lanolin alcohol was associated with the presence of chronic leg ulcers. Benzocaine was found to be the leading allergen among patients with chronic leg ulcers (positive patch test reactions in 34.4% of the patients). Conclusions. Contact sensitization to benzocaine, p-phenylenediamine, and lanolin was found to be associated with the presence of chronic leg ulcers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Gómez Torrijos ◽  
Lucía Moreno Lozano ◽  
Alba Mª Extrmera Ortega ◽  
Oscar Gonzalez Jimenez ◽  
Alejandro R. Gratacós Gómez ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. S170
Author(s):  
Maria Tengvall Linder ◽  
Carl-Fredrik Wahlgren ◽  
Catharina Johansson ◽  
Annika Scheynius

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phuong Pham Thi Minh ◽  
Trang Thi Minh ◽  
Doanh Le Huu ◽  
Thuong Nguyen Van ◽  
Sau Nguyen Huu ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is a common chronic and relapsing skin disease with various clinical features. Hand eczema aetiology can be allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), atopic dermatitis (AD) and unknown or combination causes. If the causative agents are not detected treatment of hand eczema will be a failure. A patch test can be useful to detect causative agents in suspected allergic contact hand eczema. Then patients will avoid contacting them. This results in the improvement of hand eczema. In Vietnam, patch test has not been used before, so we conduct this study. AIM: To identify causative allergens by using patch test with 28 standard allergens in consecutive patients. METHODS: A group of 300 HE patients from the National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology (NHDV) in Vietnam were enrolled in this study. They were divided into 4 groups-ACD, ICD, AD and unknown aetiology. The patient was patch tested with 28 standard allergens to identify the causative agents. RESULTS: Among the 300 HE enrolled patients, ACD accounted for 72.7%, AD and ICD had the same rate of 12.7%. 39.3% of the patients had a positive patch test. Reaction to nickel sulfate was the most common (10.3%), followed by potassium dichromate (9.7%), cobalt (4%) and fragrance mix (3.1%). About one-third of the cases had relevant clinical reactions correlated with the contact agents and clinical history. Males reacted to cement, thiuram mix and formaldehyde more than females, while females reacted to a nickel more than males. CONCLUSIONS: Hand eczema has variable clinical features and diverse aetiology. ACD is an important cause of hand eczema that can be managed with a patch test to detect causative allergens. Nearly 40% of HE cases had positive patch test. Relevant patch test reactions were seen in one-third of the patients. We propose using patch test detect causative agents in suspected allergic contact hand eczema. Then patients will avoid contacting them. This results in the improvement of hand eczema.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catriona I. Wootton ◽  
Mick Soukavong ◽  
Sonexai Kidoikhammouan ◽  
Bounthome Samountry ◽  
John S.C. English ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundDermatological services in Laos, South East Asia are limited to the capital and patch testing is currently not available, so no data exists regarding the common cutaneous allergens in this population.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to document common allergens in medical students in Laos. Patients/Materials/MethodsOne hundred and fifty medical students were patch tested using TRUE Test® panels 1 to 3 (35 allergens). Readings were taken at Days 2 and 4.ResultsThirty-eight students (25.3%) had a positive reaction to at least one allergen, accounting for 52 reactions in total. The proportion of the students with positive patch test reading was significantly higher in the female [33/96 (34%)] than in the male [5/54 (9%)], p<0.001. The most common allergens were: nickel (10%), gold (6.6%), thiomersal (6.6%), cobalt dichloride (2%) and p-tert-Butylphenol formaldehyde resin (2%). Balsam of Peru (0.66%), black rubber mix (0.66%), Cl+Me-Isothiazolinone (0.66%), fragrance mix 1 (0.66%), quinolone mix (0.66%), methyldibromo glutaronitrile (0.66%), mercapto mix (0.66%), epoxy resin (0.66%), paraben mix (0.66%), thiuram (0.66%) and wool alcohols (0.66%) accounted for all of the other positive reactions.ConclusionThis study represents the first documented patch test results in Lao medical students and in the adult Lao population. The results of this study will inform any future research into contact allergy in Laos and give an insight into the background level of contact sensitivity in this population.


Dermatitis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 228-229
Author(s):  
Jeffrey S. Smith ◽  
Jutamas Suwanpradid ◽  
Amanda S. MacLeod ◽  
Amber Reck Atwater

2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Geier ◽  
Holger Lessmann ◽  
Simin Hellriegel ◽  
Thomas Fuchs

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document