Effect of Surface Sealants on Marginal Microleakage in Class V Resin Composite Restorations

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 397-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
SORAIA VELOSO SILVA SANTANA ◽  
ANTONIO CARLOS BOMBANA ◽  
FLÁVIA MARTÃO FLÓRIO ◽  
ROBERTA TARKANY BASTING
Keyword(s):  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class V ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Surface Sealants ◽  
Effect Of Surface

scholarly journals The effect of surface sealants with different filler content on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 163-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozge Kam Hepdeniz ◽  
Ugur Burak Temel ◽  
Muhittin Ugurlu ◽  
Ozgur Koskan
Keyword(s):  
Filler Content ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Class V ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Surface Sealants ◽  
Effect Of Surface

ABSTRACT Objective: Microleakage is still one of the most cited reasons for failure of resin composite restorations. Alternative methods to prevent microleakage have been investigated increasingly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the microleakage in Class V resin composite restorations with or without application of surface sealants with different filler content. Materials and Methods: Ninety-six cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces with the coronal margins located in enamel and the cervical margins located in dentin. The cavities restored with an adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan) and resin composite (Clearfil Majesty ES-2, Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan). Teeth were stored in distilled water for 24 h and separated into four groups according to the surface sealants (Control, Fortify, Fortify Plus, and G-Coat Plus). The teeth were thermocycled (500 cycles, 5–55°C), immersed in basic fuchsine, sectioned, and analyzed for dye penetration using stereomicroscope. The data were submitted to statistical analysis by Kruskal–Wallis and Bonferroni–Dunn test. Results: The results of the study indicated that there was minimum leakage at the enamel margins of all groups. Bonferroni–Dunn tests revealed that Fortify and GC-Coat groups showed significantly less leakage than the Control group and the Fortify Plus group at dentin margins in lingual surfaces (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The all surface sealants used in this study eliminated microleakage at enamel margins. Moreover, unfilled or nanofilled surface sealants were the most effective in decreasing the degree of marginal microleakage at dentin margins. However, viscosity and penetrability of the sealants could be considered for sealing ability besides composition.

Effect of New Generation Surface Sealants on the Marginal Permeability of Class V Resin Composite Restorations

10.2341/05-77 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 481-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Owens ◽  
W. W. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class V ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Marginal Integrity ◽  
Surface Sealants ◽  
New Generation

Clinical Relevance Surface sealants, when applied to Class V resin composite restorations, can contribute to a significant reduction in microleakage, thus enhancing marginal integrity.

scholarly journals Effect of Diode Laser (810 nm) Irradiation on Marginal Microleakage of Multi-mode Adhesive Resins in Class V Composite Restorations

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-282
Author(s):  
Niusha Golbar ◽  
Shahin Kasraei ◽  
Anahit Afrasiabi ◽  
Elahe Mostajir ◽  
Seyed Masoud Mojahedi
Keyword(s):  
Diode Laser ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Blue Dye ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Class V ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Multi Mode

Introduction: Some studies have shown that laser irradiation on unpolymerized adhesives can improve composite-dentin adhesion. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the diode laser (810 nm) on the microleakage of multi-mode adhesive systems at enamel and dentin margins of composite restorations. Methods: Classic class V boxes were prepared on 48 sound premolar teeth and randomly divided into 6 groups (n=16). In the control groups, Scotchbond Universal (SBC), G-Premio (GBC), and Ambar U (AMC) were used by a self-etch mode. In the test groups (SBL, GBL, ABL), the 810 nm diode laser was irradiated (1 W) for 10 seconds before the polymerization of the adhesive. The boxes were restored by the resin composite. After finishing and polishing, the samples were thermocycled (5°C to 55°C) for 1000 cycles and then immersed in 0.1% methylene blue dye (48 hours). Dye penetration through the gingival and occlusal margins was measured by Stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed at the 5% significance level using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Significant differences were found between the control and test groups (P<0.05). The occlusal margins of the SBL and GBL groups and the cervical margin of the SBL group exhibited the lowest microleakage (P<0.05). The AM control group showed maximum microleakage at cervical and occlusal margins. Conclusion: The irradiation of the 810 nm diode laser on the unpolymerized universal adhesive systems in a self-etch mode caused a significant reduction in enamel and dentin marginal microleakage of composite restorations.

scholarly journals Marginal Permeability of Self-etch and Total-etch Adhesive Systems

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Owens ◽  
W. W. Johnson ◽  
E. F. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Class V ◽  
Strict Adherence ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Surface Anatomy ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance Decreased leakage was associated with Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (total etch) and iBond (self-etch) systems in Class V resin composite restorations. All adhesive systems performed best when bonded to enamel compared to dentin surface anatomy. Clinicians should be aware that strict adherence to manufacturer instructions, when using these materials, is of primary importance.

Effect of Surface Sealants and Polishing Time on Composite Surface Roughness and Microhardness

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 408-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
VC Ruschel ◽  
VS Bona ◽  
LN Baratieri ◽  
HP Maia
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Composite Surface ◽  
Force Microscopy ◽  
Atomic Force ◽  
Surface Sealants ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Surface Sealant ◽  
Effect Of Surface

SUMMARY The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface sealants and polishing delay time on a nanohybrid resin composite roughness and microhardness. Eighty disc specimens were made with a nanohybrid resin (Esthet-X HD, Dentsply). The specimens were divided into two groups (n=40) according to polishing time: immediate, after 10 minutes; delayed, after 48 hours. Each group was subdivided into four groups (n=10), according to the surface treatment: CG, control–rubber points (Jiffy Polishers, Ultradent); PP, rubber points + surface sealant (PermaSeal, Ultradent); PF, rubber points + surface sealant (Fortify, Bisco); PB, rubber points + surface sealant (BisCover, Bisco). Surface roughness (Ra) and microhardness (50 g/15 seconds) were measured. Surface morphology was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. The data were analyzed statistically using one-way analysis of variance and the Games-Howell post hoc test (α=0.05). PermaSeal roughness (G2) in the delayed polishing group was significantly higher (p=0.00) than that of the other groups. No difference was observed among the groups between immediate and delayed polishing (p=1.00), except for PermaSeal (p=0.00). Moreover, PermaSeal showed the lowest microhardness values (p=0.00) for immediate polishing. Microhardness was higher at delayed polishing for all the surface treatments (p=0.00) except Fortify (p=0.73). Surface smoothness similar to polishing with rubber points was achieved when surface sealants were used, except for PermaSeal surface sealant, which resulted in a less smooth resin composite surface. However, surface sealant application did not significantly improve composite resin microhardness.

scholarly journals Influence of cavosurface angle on the stress concentration and gaps formation in class V resin composite restorations

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 272-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayla Macyelle de Oliveira Correia ◽  
Victoria Elisa Maciel Pereira ◽  
Eduardo Bresciani ◽  
Jeffrey A. Platt ◽  
Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Concentration ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class V ◽  
Composite Restorations

scholarly journals Alternative Technique for Class V Resin Composite Restorations with Minimum Finishing/Polishing Procedures

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. Perez
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
New Technique ◽  
Alternative Technique ◽  
Insertion Technique ◽  
Class V ◽  
Rubber Dam ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Polishing Procedures ◽  
A New Technique

Clinical Relevance Class V restorations are a common challenge to clinicians. These restorations involve problems, including isolation, adhesion, insertion technique, finishing and polishing. In order to solve these problems, several techniques have been developed. This article describes a new technique for the restoration of Class V cavities, one that eliminates rubber dam isolation and avoids any contamination. If used properly, this technique also provides good cervical contour, reducing or eliminating finishing and polishing procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document