scholarly journals THE RELATIONSHIP OF FAMILY AND JUVENILE COURTS IN CHILD ABUSE CASES

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-28
Author(s):  
Leonard P. Edwards
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennfier M. Jester ◽  
Leon I. Puttler ◽  
Susan Refior ◽  
Robert A. Zucker

e-CliniC ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian P.S. Sumayku ◽  
Djemi Tomuka ◽  
Erwin Kristanto

Abstract: Child abuse is all forms of painful treatment physical or emotional, sexual abuse, trafficking, neglect, commercial exploitation including sexual exploitation of children resulting in injury/loss of actual or potential harm to the child's health, child survival, child development or dignity children, conducted in the context of a relationship of responsibility, trust, or power. Early marriage can be defined as an inner and outer bond between a man and a woman as husband and wife at a young age/adolescent. This study was aimed to determine the relationship between marriage age and child abuse in Manado. This was a retrospective study with a cross-sectional design using secondary data from several sources in Manado from October 2014 to October 2016. The results showed that many cases of child abuse occured with parents at susceptible age of 21-25 years in 8 cases (47.1%), followed by age 31-35 years in 4 cases (23.5%), susceptible age of 26-30 years and >35 years, each in 2 cases (11.8%), and the least at the marriage age of 15-20 years in 1 case (5.88%). Conclusion: Parents/step parents that married at the age of 21-25 years had the higher percentage of child abuse compared to those that maried at the ages of 15-20 years and over 25 years.Keywords: marriage age, child abuse Abstrak: Kekerasan terhadap anak adalah semua bentuk/tindakan perlakuan menyakitkan secara fisik ataupun emosional, penyalahgunaan seksual, trafiking, penelantaran, eksploitasi komersial termasuk eksploitasi seksual komersial anak yang mengakibatkan cidera/kerugian nyata ataupun potensial terhadap kesehatan anak, kelangsungan hidup anak, tumbuh kembang anak atau martabat anak, yang dilakukan dalam konteks hubungan tanggung jawab, kepercayaan atau kekuasaan. Perkawinan usia muda dapat didefenisikan sebagai ikatan lahir batin antara seorang pria dengan wanita sebagai suami istri pada usia yang masih muda/remaja. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan usia waktu menikah dengan kekerasan pada anak di Kota Manado. Jenis penelitian ialah retrospektif dengan desain potong lintang dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang diperoleh dari RS Bhayangkara, Polresta Manado, dan BKKBN Manado. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan kasus kekerasan pada anak banyak terjadi pada usia 21-25 tahun yang berjumlah 8 kasus (47,1%), diikuti usia 31-35 tahun yang berjumlah 4 kasus (23,5%), usia 26-30 tahun dan >35 tahun masing-masing berjumlah 2 kasus (11,8%), dan yang paling sedikit pada usia waktu menikah 15-20 tahun berjumlah 1 kasus se (5,88%). Simpulan: Orang tua kandung/tiri dengan usia waktu menikah 21-25 tahun yang paling banyak melakukan kekerasan pada anak dibandingkan usia waktu menikah dini 15-20 tahun atau usia di atas 25 tahun. Kata kunci: usia menikah, kekerasan pada anak


Paleobiology ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 6 (02) ◽  
pp. 146-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Oliver

The Mesozoic-Cenozoic coral Order Scleractinia has been suggested to have originated or evolved (1) by direct descent from the Paleozoic Order Rugosa or (2) by the development of a skeleton in members of one of the anemone groups that probably have existed throughout Phanerozoic time. In spite of much work on the subject, advocates of the direct descent hypothesis have failed to find convincing evidence of this relationship. Critical points are:(1) Rugosan septal insertion is serial; Scleractinian insertion is cyclic; no intermediate stages have been demonstrated. Apparent intermediates are Scleractinia having bilateral cyclic insertion or teratological Rugosa.(2) There is convincing evidence that the skeletons of many Rugosa were calcitic and none are known to be or to have been aragonitic. In contrast, the skeletons of all living Scleractinia are aragonitic and there is evidence that fossil Scleractinia were aragonitic also. The mineralogic difference is almost certainly due to intrinsic biologic factors.(3) No early Triassic corals of either group are known. This fact is not compelling (by itself) but is important in connection with points 1 and 2, because, given direct descent, both changes took place during this only stage in the history of the two groups in which there are no known corals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document