THE USE OF FUNCTIONAL JOB ANALYSIS IN ESTABLISHING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATORS

1981 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
HOWARD C. OLSON ◽  
SIDNEY A. FINE ◽  
DAVID C. MYERS ◽  
MARGARETTE C. JENNINGS
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Chung-Yan ◽  
Aaron Schat ◽  
Steven Cronshaw

This study addresses an open research question in regard to a well-established and widely-used job analysis system, Functional Job Analysis (FJA): Are consensus ratings of the FJA scales more reliable than the independent scale ratings that are the norm in job analysis application and the related research literature? In our experimental study, we found that this is not the case: no significant difference is found between consensus and independent ratings of the FJA scales. The reasons for this finding are explored as well as its relevance to the validity of the FJA system. Implications for other work and job analysis systems are discussed.


1999 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 42-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Havranek ◽  
Martin G. Brodwin ◽  
Larry G. Kontosh

Functional Job Analysis will continue to be the preferred method for accurate, reliable, and legally defensible determination of job duties. With the implementation of the Occupational Information Network (O*NET), job-related functions to be evaluated will expand and the potential applications and problems, both practical and research, will increase. The O*NET system is described, as are potential uses and shortcomings of O*NET, as well as the importance of O*NET to job analysis and vocational evaluation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desta A. Hailemariam ◽  
Xiaojun Shan ◽  
Sung H. Chung ◽  
Mohammad T. Khasawneh ◽  
William Lukesh ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin A. Fleishman

This paper describes issues in developing a scientifically based system for relating the abilities of people required to perform jobs to the nature of the task characteristics of these jobs. Conceptual and methodological issues in classifying tasks are discussed as are the objectives of task taxonomies and criteria for their evaluation. Alternative taxonomic approaches are described. A particular approach to classifying tasks in terms of ability requirements is described in more detail and evaluated according to a number of criteria and applications. These latter include encouraging utility in job analysis, test development, setting performance standards, and classifying jobs into families.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 177
Author(s):  
Rizqi Suci Lestari ◽  
Rizal Syarief ◽  
M. Joko Affandi

<p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong></p><p class="Default"><em>As an attempt to support the performance and improvement of the image of the House of Representatives in carrying out their duties, it is important to establish performance standards for each member of Parliament as dominant individual running their functions. Designing performance standards for members of Parliament is a process undertaken to draw up a performance standard for the House of Representatives members. Such a process begins with job analysis of Parliament members. The results of this analysis are then used to draw up a job description and work dimensions of Parliament members, to formulate performance standards for the House of Representatives members. Application of performance standards based on these results, if applied uniformly to all members of the House of Representatives, can be used as benchmarks in assessing the performance of these Parliament members, so that it can be used as a guide in evaluating their performance according to “The Regulations of House of Represantative of Indonesian Republic No.1 Year 2014 on Codes of Conduct”.</em></p><em>Keyword:</em><em>job analysis, members of the House of Representatives, performance evaluation, performance, performance standards</em>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document