Is it Race, Immigrant Status, or Both? An Analysis of Wage Disparities among Men in the United States

2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quincy Thomas Stewart ◽  
Jeffrey C. Dixon
1945 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
Albert G. D. Levy

Several families now living in the Emergency Refugee Shelter which the United States Government has established at Fort Ontario, in the state of New York, are expecting the birth of children in the near future. Will these children acquire American citizenship jure soli? Does the non-immigrant status of the parents derogate from the privilege of the children? And most important among the numerous questions involved, Does the so-called “refugee free port” constitute the requisite type of American territory?


2019 ◽  
pp. 427-440
Author(s):  
Rosaire Ifedi

This paper was based, in part, on some findings related to the intersection of identity and career outcomes for some African-born female academics located in the United States. In the phenomenological study, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and revealed accounts of race and gendered challenges in their experiences. However, even though they faced similar kinds of marginalization as other Black and foreign women, these participants were confronted with unique questions of identification and experiences of double discrimination. Nonetheless, the findings also suggest a persistence that was reflected in their stories of access, inclusion, and exclusion as well as their perceived role as coalition-builders. An implication for immigrant female professors in the U.S. is that their immigrant status could both facilitate as well as challenge their career paths and economic outcomes, a point equally corroborated by research on gender and migration in higher education in Europe and elsewhere.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Soroka ◽  
Matthew Wright ◽  
Richard Johnston ◽  
Jack Citrin ◽  
Keith Banting ◽  
...  

AbstractDo increasing, and increasingly diverse, immigration flows lead to declining support for redistributive policy? This concern is pervasive in the literatures on immigration, multiculturalism and redistribution, and in public debate as well. The literature is nevertheless unable to disentangle the degree to which welfare chauvinism is related to (a) immigrant status or (b) ethnic difference. This paper reports on results from a web-based experiment designed to shed light on this issue. Representative samples from the United States, Quebec, and the “Rest-of-Canada” responded to a vignette in which a hypothetical social assistance recipient was presented as some combination of immigrant or not, and Caucasian or not. Results from the randomized manipulation suggest that while ethnic difference matters to welfare attitudes, in these countries it is immigrant status that matters most. These findings are discussed in light of the politics of diversity and recognition, and the capacity of national policies to address inequalities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document