Lessons Learned in Phase I of the Southern Rural Access Program

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 416-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Beachler ◽  
Curtis Holloman ◽  
Donald E. Pathman
2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 416-421
Author(s):  
Michael Beachler ◽  
Curtis Holloman ◽  
Donald E. Pathman

Author(s):  
Matt Devendorf ◽  
Kemper Lewis ◽  
Timothy W. Simpson ◽  
Robert B. Stone ◽  
William C. Regli

Recent cyberinfrastructure initiatives seek to create ubiquitous, comprehensive, interactive, and functionally complete digital environments that consist of people, data, information, tools, and instruments for research communities. With product dissection as our unifying theme, we are forging a cyberinfrastructure to support undergraduate design engineering education through CIBER-U: Cyber-Infrastructure-Based Engineering Repositories for Undergraduates. CIBER-U pairs two of the nation’s leading design repository developers with several active users and their students to realize a high-impact application of cyberinfrastructure in engineering undergraduate curricula involving freshmen through seniors. Specifically, CIBER-U combines product dissection activities at three universities with two digital design repositories, CAD modeling and animation, video, MediaWiki technology, multimedia, and undergraduate summer research experiences to enable cyberinfrastructure-based product dissection activities. Nearly 700 students have participated in the Phase I efforts of CIBER-U, which have focused primarily on generating, capturing, and storing data in two digital design repositories. Lessons learned from these efforts are presented from the students’ perspectives as well as that of the faculty in both engineering and computer science. The implications for implementing CIBER-U on a national scale are discussed along with ongoing research.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4553-4553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lenneke F J Groningen ◽  
Christoph Groth ◽  
Manita E J Bremmers ◽  
Eric G Hooren ◽  
Ypke V J M van Oosterhout ◽  
...  

Background More effective therapies for treating steroid-refractory acute GVHD (SR-aGVHD) are urgently needed. In our recent phase I/II study, we showed that anti-CD3/anti-CD7 immunotoxin (IT) therapy T-Guard was both safe and well tolerated, and yielded both a high rate of CR and high 6-month OS in high-risk patients (Groth et al. BBMT 2019). Following this study, patients with SR-aGVHD were offered T-Guard via an expanded access treatment program (EAP). Objectives We evaluated patients' outcome after receiving T-Guard for SR-aGVHD. In addition, we examined the relationship between plasma citrulline levels (a biomarker of enterocyte mass) and the response to T-Guard in a subset of patients with SR-aGVHD of the gut, combining 16 patients from the phase I/II trial and 9 patients in the EAP group. Methods An EAP was started after completion of the phase I/II trial. This program was approved by the local ethics committee and the Health and Youth Care Inspectorate of the Dutch government. Adult patients with grade II-IV SR-aGVHD were eligible to receive T-Guard as their second- or third-line treatment for aGVHD. Patients with an uncontrolled infection, signs of moderate-severe chronic GVHD, and/or severe renal impairment were not eligible to receive T-Guard. Eligible patients received four 4-hour i.v. infusions of 4 mg/m2 T-Guard delivered at 48-hour intervals. In addition, plasma citrulline levels were measured at baseline and every 7 days after the start of T-Guard therapy using HPLC with mass spectrometry. A plasma citrulline level <10 µmol/L was considered to indicate severe GI-GVHD. Results From Jan. 2017 through Dec. 2018, 12 patients (8 male, 4 female; median age: 54 yr, range: 20-70 yr) who had received an allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myeloid or lymphoid malignancy were treated with T-Guard. T-Guard was given as the second-line therapy to 10 patients; the remaining 2 patients received T-Guard as the third-line therapy after receiving ruxolitinib (N=1) or cyclosporin-UVB (N=1). The median time between aGVHD onset and the start of T-Guard therapy was 7 days (range: 3-55 days). SR-aGVHD was classified as grade II, III, or IV in 1, 7, and 4 patients, respectively. Nine patients (75%) had GI involvement, and the skin and liver were involved in 6 and 2 cases, respectively. All 12 patients were classified as high-risk in accordance with MacMillan et al. (BJH 2012), and the median albumin level at baseline was 23 g/L (range: 13-32 g/L). By treatment day 28, 9 patients (75%) had achieved a clinical response, with 5 achieving complete remission. After a median follow-up of 16 months, 7 patients were alive; the 6-month and 1-year OS rate was 75% and 58%, respectively, which was significantly higher than historical controls; Figure 1. The cause of death in the other five patients was refractory aGVHD (N=3), relapse AML (N=1), and GVHD after undergoing a second stem cell transplantation for relapse AML (N=1). No significant infusion-related reactions were recorded. As expected, the overall rate of infection was high, but was comparable to other cohorts; 1 and 2 patients developed an EBV or CMV infection, respectively, but these were manageable. The most common potentially treatment-related adverse events were transient worsening of hypoalbuminemia and thrombocytopenia. One patient developed grade 2 vascular leak syndrome, but this was easily managed. One patient developed severe thrombotic microangiopathy with renal insufficiency, but several contributing factors other than the use of T-Guard were present in this patient, including calcineurin toxicity, severe GI-GVHD, and CMV disease. Our preliminary analysis of citrulline levels in 16 patients with GI-GVHD showed that mean baseline levels were extremely low (4.3 µmol/L; range: 2.9-17.9 µmol/L); 28 days after the start of T-guard, citrulline levels had increased significantly in the 9 patients who achieved complete remission; Figure 2. Conclusion Consistent with our recent phase I/II trial, our expanded access program in which 12 patients with high-risk SR-aGVHD received T-guard confirms that this treatment is safe and significantly improves patient outcome. A multicenter phase III study is planned to start in 2019 (BMT-CTN 1802). Disclosures Hooren: Xenikos BV: Employment. van Oosterhout:Xenikos BV: Employment.


Author(s):  
Hui Cai ◽  
Kent Spreckelmeyer

Purpose: This study aims to demonstrate how multiphase postoccupancy evaluation (POE) research was integrated into multiple projects to develop a continuous learning cycle. Background: Despite the well-recognized importance of POE, few studies have reported how knowledge from POE is applied in new designs. Method: This study is developed as a multiphase POE that spanned 3 years and across three units. Phase I POE compared an existing unit (Unit A) in Hospital A and a new Unit B in Hospital B that has implemented innovative design features such as decentralized nurse stations. The idea was to understand the challenges of the existing facility in Hospital A and gather lessons learned from the new design in Unit B to inform the design of the Hospital A expansion (Unit C). After the new expansion was occupied, the Phase II POE was conducted using the same set of POE tools in both Unit C and Unit A. The POE applied the following methods: (1) patient room evaluations using the Center for Health Design standardized POE tools, (2) space syntax analysis of visibility, and (3) a pre- and postmove analysis of Press Ganey data. Results: The results demonstrated that by incorporating lessons learned from the Phase I POE, Unit C has further improvement on patient room design ratings, improved patient satisfaction, and better visibility among nurse work areas compared to Unit A and Unit B. Conclusions: The multiphase, multisite POE with standardized tools has demonstrated its value as an important tool for continuous design quality improvement.


2003 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 354-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin P. Rackley ◽  
John R. Wheat ◽  
Cynthia E. Moore ◽  
Robert G. Garner ◽  
Barbara W. Harrell

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hafiz M. Munir ◽  
Bashar Sinokrot ◽  
Dennis E. Ford

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shea Hess Webber ◽  
Lisa Upton ◽  
Andres Munoz-Jaramillo ◽  
Todd Hoeksema ◽  
Rock Bush ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 1362-1368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Paoletti ◽  
Benoît Baron ◽  
Patrick Schöffski ◽  
Pierre Fumoleau ◽  
Denis Lacombe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document