Beyond Cognitive Framing Processes: Anger Mediates the Effects of Responsibility Framing on the Preference for Punitive Measures

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rinaldo Kühne ◽  
Patrick Weber ◽  
Katharina Sommer
Keyword(s):  
Framing Processes ◽  
Cognitive Framing

Japan Meets the Sharing Economy: Contending Frames

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G ALTURA ◽  
Yuki HASHIMOTO ◽  
Sanford M JACOBY ◽  
Kaoru KANAI ◽  
Kazuro SAGUCHI
Keyword(s):  
Political Economy ◽  
Civil Society ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Social Problems ◽  
Prime Minister ◽  
Sharing Economy ◽  
The World ◽  
Framing Processes ◽  
Regulatory Institutions

Abstract The ‘sharing economy’ epitomized by Airbnb and Uber has challenged business, labor, and regulatory institutions throughout the world. The arrival of Airbnb and Uber in Japan provided an opportunity for Prime Minister Abe’s administration to demonstrate its commitment to deregulation. Both platform companies garnered support from powerful governmental and industry actors who framed the sharing economy as a solution to various economic and social problems. However, they met resistance from actors elsewhere in government, the private sector, and civil society, who constructed competing frames. Unlike studies that compare national responses to the sharing economy, we contrast the different experiences and fates of Airbnb and Uber within a single country. Doing so highlights actors, framing processes, and within-country heterogeneity. The study reveals the limits of overly institutionalized understandings of Japanese political economy. It also contributes to current debates concerning Prime Minister Abe’s efforts at implementing deregulation during the 2010s.

Risk Shift: An Institutional Logics Perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 1113-1147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saheli Nath
Keyword(s):  
Belief Systems ◽  
Public Policies ◽  
Institutional Logics ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Framing Processes ◽  
Policy Solutions

This study uses the concept of institutional logics and the framing processes emanating from these guiding logics to understand how risk is shifted through public policies. The study concludes that Hacker’s argument that public policies have reconstructed markets to aid the privileged by shifting risk onto the less privileged may have underestimated some of the complexities driving the phenomenon, particularly those stemming from actors having to cope with conflicting logics and ambiguity concerning policy solutions to seemingly intractable challenges. Risk shift does not necessarily involve unilateral transfer of risk from policy makers to risk bearers. Risk shift can emerge out of the complex microinteractions among relevant actors and the framing processes guided by competing logics or belief systems in which the collaborating actors are embedded.

Honesty among lawyers: Moral character, game framing, and honest disclosures in negotiations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taya R. Cohen ◽  
Erik G Helzer ◽  
Robert Creo
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Moral Character ◽  
The United States ◽  
Law Students ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Cognitive Framing

Lawyers have broad discretion in deciding how honestly to behave when negotiating. We propose that lawyers’ choices about whether to disclose information to correct misimpressions by opposing counsel are guided by their moral character and their cognitive framing of negotiation. To investigate this possibility, we surveyed 215 lawyers from across the United States, examining the degree to which honest disclosure is associated with lawyers’ moral character and their tendency to frame negotiation in game-like terms—a construal of negotiation that we label game framing. We hypothesize that the more that lawyers view negotiation through a game frame—that is, the more they view negotiation as an adversarial context with arbitrary and artificial rules—the less honest they will be in situations in which honest disclosure is not mandated by professional rules of conduct. We further hypothesize that lawyers with higher levels of moral character will apply a game frame to negotiation to a lesser degree than will lawyers with lower levels of moral character, and that honesty when negotiating will be higher when lawyers have higher versus lower levels of moral character. Our study results support these hypotheses. This work suggests that focusing on game-like aspects of negotiation can induce a less moral and ethical mindset. To the extent that teaching law students to “think like a lawyer” encourages them to adopt a game frame of negotiation, we can expect such training to reduce the likelihood of honest disclosure.

German media debates and framing processes in a hybridised P/CVE landscape

2021 ◽  
pp. 145-164
Author(s):  
Gordon Clubb ◽  
Daniel Koehler ◽  
Jonatan Schewe ◽  
Ryan O’Connor
Keyword(s):  
Framing Processes

Anthropomorphism in Computer Security Terminology Through the Prizm of Smart Cognitive Framing

2021 ◽  
pp. 460-474
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Isaeva ◽  
Olga Baiburova ◽  
Oksana Manzhula
Keyword(s):  
Computer Security ◽  
Cognitive Framing

Exploring the Crisis of the Reform Movement in Iran (1997–2005)

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-409
Author(s):  
SEYED AMIR NIAKOOEE
Keyword(s):  
Social Movements ◽  
Collective Action ◽  
Social Movement ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Political Process ◽  
Reform Movement ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Opportunity ◽  
Framing Processes ◽  
Comprehensive Framework

AbstractThe Second Khordad Movement was a democratic social movement in contemporary Iran. Investigation of this movement revealed two images, of flourish and of decline, as the movement was first generally successful until early 2000 and thereafter began to regress from the spring of that year onwards. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive framework in which to examine the reasons behind the movement's failure and regression. To this end, the study utilizes the literature on social movements, especially the political process model, and attempts to explain the initial success and subsequent decline of the movement based on elements such as political opportunity, framing processes, mobilizing structures, and the repertoire of collective action.

scholarly journals Cognitive framing in action

Cognition ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 42-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Huhn ◽  
Cory Adam Potts ◽  
David A. Rosenbaum
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Framing
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document